2 Description of system setup

The proposed system is designed for ICF applications, which require high beam quality and flexible beam quality control, including temporal pulse waveforms, pulse spectra, spatial near fields, far fields and wave fronts aberration. The laser system consists of three parts: an all-fiber structure seeder, a regenerative amplifier and a multi-pass amplifier. The entire master oscillator power amplifier (MOPA) system starts from the all-fiber front-end seeder system developed by Qiao et al. ^{[Reference Qiao, Wang, Fan and Lin13]}. The front-end system provides a sub-nano-Joule energy seed pulse with the central wavelength at 1053 nm and pulse width of 6 ns. The front-end seeder system can generate arbitrary temporal pulse waveforms with an arbitrary waveform generator (AWG). The generated seed pulse is then transported through the fiber and injected into a highly stable, all-solid-state, diode-pumped Nd:glass regenerative amplifier developed by Wang et al. ^{[Reference Wang, Li, Wei and Zhu14, Reference Peng, Wang, Zhang, Fan and Li15]}. The regenerative amplifier is schematically shown in Figure 1. The amplifier is a linear, folded, 5.4-m long stable cavity, designed to be operated in the stable region. After injection from a fiber collimator (FC), the laser pulse goes through a two-stage isolation, composed of a thin film polarizer (TFP), a half-wave plate (WP) and an FR, to avoid FC damage incurred by the reverse beam (leaking beam from the regenerative cavity, resulting from the low extinction ratio (200 : 1) of TFP). The cavity consists of two concave high-reflection end mirrors, M1 and M2, and an intra-cavity convex lens, L. In order to restrict the spatial mode to a single transverse mode, a hard edge aperture (HAP) is set around the intra-cavity lens. The laser pulse round trips in the cavity are controlled by a PC and a QWP, with the PC driver set at a voltage of $1/4$ lambda. The regenerative amplifier reaches 10 mJ class energy, which implies that magnification gain is $10^{7}$ . The long-term stability of the output energy is better than 0.5% r.m.s. The entire system is operated at 1 Hz, owing to the low repetition rate used in high-power laser facilities such as NIF, LMJ and SG series.

Based on the millijoule energy output of the regenerative laser amplifier, the laser pulse is further amplified in a multi-pass ring laser amplifier (MPRA). The structure of the MPRA is outlined in Figure 1. In Figure 1, BX5 indicates a $5\times$ beam expander. AP is a soft edge aperture with an $8.1~\text{mm}\times 8.1~\text{mm}$ square aperture, which is designed to make full use of the 13-mm-diameter gain medium rod. PBS1 and PBS2 are polarization beam splitters combined with the PC, which are used to inject and export the laser pulse, respectively. L1–L4 are 750-mm-focal-length plano-convex lenses, and L5–L6 are 1000-mm-focal-length plano-convex lenses. VSF1–VSF3 are vacuum spatial filters (VSFs) with a $20\times$ diffraction limitation pinhole in the focal plane of the VSF’s first lens, which can filter out high spatial frequency components at the focal plane and suppress ghost images as well as parasitic oscillations resulting from optical elements stray light. The ring cavity was developed based on image relay technique with the three lens pairs and the VSFs. AMP1 and AMP2 are the amplifier laser heads assembled by a 13-mm-diameter and 160-mm-long Nd:glass rod at the center surrounded by four xenon flash lamps. The 50-mm-diameter $45^{\circ }$ high-reflectivity mirrors with 1053-nm anti-reflection (AR) coatings, are used to fold the cavity. In the MPRA, a PC with deuterated potassium dihydrogen phosphate (DKDP) as the electro-optic crystal (clear aperture 15 mm, model 5046E, FastPulse Technology, Inc.) is used for injecting and switching out the laser pulse. The PC, which is based on the active polarization state control technique, is the key equipment for the active multi-pass amplifier. Rt is a $90^{\circ }$ quartz rotator, used to compensate thermally induced depolarization, combined with a VSF2 4f relay-imaged system between two identical laser heads, which will be described in detail in Section 3.

The implementation of the MPRA cavity is briefly discussed below. The entire cavity length $L$ depends on the pulse width $t_{p}$ that is applied to the cavity, $L=t_{c}c>(t_{r}+t_{p})c$ , where $t_{c}$ is the ring cavity’s round trip time, $c$ is the speed of light in air and $t_{r}$ is the rising edge time of the PC (it is assumed that the rising and falling times are ${\sim}10~\text{ns}$ ). In this experiment, the cavity length is approximately 10 m to support the amplification of a 20-ns maximal laser pulse width, without overlap. The entire system consists of three 4f relay-imaged VSFs. With VSF1, the input image plane (P1), which is the soft edge aperture, is transported to the center of AMP1 (P2). Considering the thermal lens effect, the P2 position is at the $d_{1}=l/2n$ distance from the front end of the rod, where $l$ is the length of the gain medium rod and $n$ is the index of refraction (1.542 for the Nd:glass used in this experiment). In this experiment, the distance from the front end is 5.19 cm. Similarly, P2 has been transported to the center of AMP2 (P3) with VSF2, and P3 has been transported to P4 (between L6 and PBS1) with VSF3. The distances from PBS1 to P4 and PBS1 to AP are the same, which ensures the establishment of the ring system. After transporting P4, it is regarded as the next initial image plane. Similarly, the image plane will be transported to the output image plane with energy amplified.

3 Thermal effect compensation of laser heads

In high-energy, high-power, Joule-class, repetition rate laser amplifier systems, the thermal effect is a major issue that deteriorates the laser beam quality^{[Reference Koechner16, Reference Lü, Kugler, Weber, Dong, Müller and Wittrock17]}. Thermal effects, which occur in the gain medium, include thermal lensing and thermal stress-induced birefringence. In our system, to ensure better beam quality output, some methods were adopted to alleviate and compensate for thermal effect, including the design of a high-performance laser head, and compensation for thermal lensing and thermal-induced depolarization.

In our experiment, two identical laser heads were designed. The laser head’s cross-section is shown in Figure 2(a). It consists of a gain medium rod, a filter glass sleeve (developed at the Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics (SIOM), Chinese Academy of Sciences), xenon flash lamps, a ceramic diffusive-reflecting cavity, and an outer aluminum alloy. A 13-mm-diameter and 160-mm-length Nd:glass (N3112 developed at SIOM, neodymium concentration 1.2%, $\text{Nd}_{2}\text{O}_{3}$ by weight) rod at the center is enclosed by a filter glass sleeve pumped by four xenon flash lamps. The deionized water layer between the rod and the filter glass sleeve is 2 mm thick, for high-speed water flow cooling. To reduce the amount of heat deposited on the gain medium, the filter glass sleeve was used to filter out ultra-violet rays from the xenon flash lamps^{[Reference Wang, Wei, Wang, Huang, Fan and Li5]}. The ceramic diffusive-reflecting cavity was applied in the pump cavity, which yielded a more uniform pump distribution, compared with a gold-plated cavity or an imaging cavity^{[Reference Koechner16]}. To obtain a uniform distribution of storage energy in the laser gain medium, parameters determining the characteristics of the pump cavity, such as the rod diameter, lamp diameter and ceramic diffuse reflective geometry, were simulated based on ray tracing method. Finally, considering the manufacturing of ceramics, the design in Figure 2(a) was the one that we used in our experiments.

Figure 2.

(a) Outline of the laser heads cross-section pumped by four xenon lamps. (b) Two-dimensional small signal gain distribution of the xenon lamp laser head. (c) Outline measurement of the small signal gain and degree of depolarization. WP, half-wave plate; PBS, polarization beam splitter; L1, plano-concave lens with focal length of $-100~\text{mm}$ ; L2, plano-convex lens with focal length of 400 mm; AP1, hard edge aperture; AMP, the laser head or some other optical element to be measured; L3, L4, plano-convex lenses with focal lengths of 750 mm and 500 mm, respectively; AP2, pinhole in the focus plane of L3; FP, neutral density filters and 1053 bandpass filters; A and B are two adjustable options for different measurements, two-dimensional small signal gain distribution and two-dimensional degree of polarization, respectively.

To verify the performance of the two laser heads, the two-dimensional small-signal gain distribution and degree of depolarization (DOP) of the entire cross-section, along with different pump powers, were measured. The measurement setup is shown in Figure 2(c). The laser pulse from the regenerative amplifier passes successively through the WP and the PBS, yielding a line-polarized laser pulse. With the L1 ( $-100~\text{mm}$ ) and L2 (500 mm), the laser beam is expanded five times. From the hard edge aperture AP1, a beam with an appropriate beam width ( ${\sim}12~\text{mm}$ diameter) goes through the laser head. To avoid Fresnel diffraction modulation on the beam periphery, the facet of laser rod is close to the aperture. The beam width is imaged and narrowed to fit the charge-coupled device (CCD) aperture (pixel size $13.3~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}\times 13.3~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{m}$ ; number of active pixels $1024\times 1024$ ; imaging area $13.6~\text{mm}\times 13.6~\text{mm}$ ), with a pair of plane-convex lenses L3 (750 mm) and L4 (500 mm), while the beam intensity is controlled by the absorptive neutral density filters FP. For the laser head pumped by the xenon flash lamps, the stray light from the flash lamps and the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) from the pumped rod severely alter the measurements. Using a pinhole in the focus plane of L3 and bandpass filters in front of the CCD, most of the stray light and ASE can be blocked, ensuring normal and accurate measurements. In Figure 2(c), for two-dimensional small-signal gain distribution measurements, the CCD indicated by option A and the method described in Ref. [Reference Shaykin, Fokin, Soloviev, Kuzmin, Shaikin, Burdonov, Charukhchev and Khazanov18] are adopted. For DOP measurements, it is necessary to ensure that the incident beam is vertically polarized, which was obtained by inserting a PBS in front of the laser head. After stabilizing the thermal effects in the laser gain medium (in our setup, usually two minutes after turning on the laser power supply), the measurements started. The two-dimensional DOP $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{i,j}$ along the cross-section is defined as follows:

(1) $$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E4}_{i,j}=\frac{I_{i,j}(x,y)-I_{i,j\,\text{out}}(x,y)}{I_{i,j}(x,y)},\end{eqnarray}$$

where $I_{i,j}(x,y)$ is the two-dimensional output beam intensity distribution, and $I_{i,j\,\text{out}}(x,y)$ is the two-dimensional output beam intensity distribution after PBS2 is inserted in front of the CCD. The two-dimensional DOP describes point to point beam intensity loss and is useful to investigate which part of the cross-section loses much energy. In practice, it is convenient to consider the total integral DOP^{[Reference Koechner16]},

(2) $$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=\frac{\displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{i,j}I_{i,j}(x,y)-I_{i,j\,\text{out}}(x,y)}{\displaystyle \mathop{\sum }_{i,j}I_{i,j}(x,y)},\end{eqnarray}$$

which is the ratio of the depolarization beam intensity to the total beam intensity at the output of the gain medium.

The results of the two-dimensional small-signal gain distribution for an 800 V pump of the laser head used in our system is shown in Figure 2(b). The two-dimensional small-signal gain distribution is mostly uniform and the average single-pass small-signal gain is approximately 2.0. The radial direction ratio of the periphery to the center is 1.2 : 1. As expected, the line distribution across the center shows rotational symmetry. The average small-signal gain of the cross-section versus different pump power values is shown in Figure 3(a). The average gain increases almost linearly with increasing pump power. It also indicates that the medium diameter gain medium rod is not limited by the ASE effect, which strongly influences the performance of large aperture Nd:glass disk amplifiers. In addition, the small-signal gain curves of the two laser heads, shown in Figure 3(a), do not overlap completely, while the effective pump power is 12.18 W (the AMP1 voltage is 715 V; the AMP2 voltage is 800 V). This is because the two laser power supply systems are not identical. The electrical capacitances of AMP1 power supply and AMP2 power supply are $500~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{F}$ and $400~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{F}$ , respectively.

Figure 3.

(a) The average small signal gain of the laser rods cross-section versus different pump power and (b) the integral DOP of the laser rods cross-section versus different pump power for the two laser heads, AMP1 and AMP2. The two images (Iout and Idep) in (b) are typical two-dimensional main beam intensity and depolarization beam intensity distribution in measurement.

In this experiment, the DOP was measured in detail by using the setup shown in Figure 2(c). The probe beam from the regenerative amplifier passed once through the gain medium, and the beam intensity was recorded with and without PBS. The result is shown in Figure 3(b). The DOPs of the two laser heads are similar, with the same pump power, although they were driven by different laser power supplies. The current pulse duration of the laser power supply at the 10% point was approximately given by $t_{p}=3T=3(LC)^{1/2}$ (Ref. [Reference Koechner16]), and the pulse durations were $396~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{s}$ and $355~\unicode[STIX]{x03BC}\text{s}$ . Thus, the pump efficiency of AMP1 was lower than that of AMP2, though the pump power was the same. In consequence, while the DOPs of the two laser heads are similar (same wasted heat deposited in the laser rods), the small-signal curves do not coincide.

The thermal depolarization induced by the wasted heat deposited in the laser rods significantly deteriorates the beam quality. There are two main conventional types of thermal depolarization compensation methods in high-power laser systems^{[Reference Lü, Kugler, Weber, Dong, Müller and Wittrock17, Reference Fluck, Hermann and Hackel19]}. Methods in the first category are used in one-laser-head systems that comprise a $45^{\circ }$ FR or a QWP and a $0^{\circ }$ high-reflectivity mirror; methods in the other category are used in two-identical-laser-head systems with a $90^{\circ }$ quartz rotator combined with an image relay system, which causes the $90^{\circ }$ polarization rotation between the two laser heads. Considering high-power ring cavity laser amplifier systems, the second method for compensating the thermal effect was adopted in this experiment. To understand the process of thermal depolarization compensation, single-pass thermal depolarization after compensation was simulated and measured following the method in Ref. [Reference Jeong, Cho, Kim and Yu20]. In Figure 4, the top and bottom panels show the simulated and experimentally measured residual thermal depolarization. In the simulations and experiments $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$ was 0.15% and 0.30%, respectively, in the area of the injected beam ( ${\sim}8~\text{mm}\times 8~\text{mm}$ ). Thus, the residual thermal depolarization does not constitute a problem anymore, but it should be kept in mind that the imperfect compensation of depolarization is likely to damage optical elements. In these experiments, we confirm that, to improve the compensation performance, the thermal lens and thermal depolarization should be compensated together^{[Reference Jeong, Cho, Kim and Yu20]}.

Figure 4.

Simulation and experimental measurement of the thermal depolarization compensation. The depolarization output, main beam output and the DOP are shown in (a), (b) and (c), respectively. (d), (e), and (f) show that the experimental measurement produces three types of output.

4 Results and discussion

The performance of the entire system is illustrated below. When the input energy is 0.9 mJ and the pulse width is 6 ns, the output energy after eight round trips is approximately 0.969 J, which is the target energy of this system. The output fluence density is $1.5~\text{J}/\text{cm}^{2}$ . For safe operation of MPRA, we did not increase the round trips further. The laser cavity has approximately 83% static single-pass transmittance. The average single-pass effective small-signal gain of the two laser heads is approximately 2.5. The Frantz–Nodvik equation was adopted to simulate and optimize the pulse amplification process^{[Reference Koechner16]}. The experimental and simulation results for the output energy for the eight round trips are shown in Figure 5, with the blue circles indicating the experimental data, and the red curve indicating the simulation data. Clearly, the maximal energy output increases to 1.5 J ( $2.5~\text{J}/\text{cm}^{2}$ ) at the 10th round trip. When the MPRA is operated at the 8th round trip, the energy saturation is approximately attained, which is helpful for improving the system’s stability. In the four-energy-level system, the overall stored energy in the laser gain medium is $E_{\text{st}}=g_{0}lE_{s}A=\log G_{0}E_{s}A$ , where $g_{0}$ , $G_{0}$ , $E_{s}$ , $l$ and $A$ are, respectively, the small-signal gain coefficient, small-signal gain, saturated energy density, and the length and cross-section of the laser gain medium. The saturated energy density in the laser gain medium is defined as $E_{s}=h\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}=4.967~\text{J}/\text{cm}^{2}$ , where $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}=1$ and $\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}=3.8\times 10^{-20}~\text{cm}^{2}$ for N31 Nd:glass. In our calculations, $G_{0}=3.1$ , $l=100~\text{mm}$ , $A=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\times (1.3/2)^{2}=1.33~\text{cm}^{2}$ and the overall stored energy in the laser gain medium is 7.5 J. Thus, the stored energy extraction efficiency $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\text{ex}}=(E_{\text{out}}-E_{\text{in}})/E_{\text{st}}\simeq 13\%$ . In addition, we note that the beam overlap efficiency is $\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{B}=A_{B}/A=0.8\times 0.8~\text{cm}^{2}/1.33~\text{cm}^{2}=48.2\%$ and the single-pass transmittance is 83%. The stored energy of 2.98 J is extracted by a $0.8~\text{cm}\times 0.8~\text{cm}$ square laser beam. Thus, the effective extraction efficiency of the stored energy is approximately 33%.

Figure 5.

Energy output versus the number of round trips. The blue circles and the red curve correspond to the experimental and simulation results, respectively.

The near-field and far-field profiles for the MPRA system are shown in Figure 6. The quality of the near field is satisfactory, although no special wave-front correction methods were used, as opposed to the ones in Refs. [Reference Sekine, Matsuoka, Yasuhara, Kurita, Katai, Kawashima, Kan, Kawanaka, Tsubakimoto and Norimatsu7, Reference Bagnoud, Puth, Zuegel, Mooney and Dumas12]. Thus, we show that without special wave-front corrections satisfactory-quality near field can be obtained by the MPRA system only if the laser head has a perfect pump distribution, which requires an excellent laser head design. The near-field intensity modulation (FM), defined as the ratio of maximal ( $I_{\text{max}}$ ) to average ( $I_{\text{avg}}$ ) optical intensities inside the beam aperture $\text{FM}=I_{\text{max}}/I_{\text{avg}}$ , after eight round trips, is 1.42. The line distributions in the $x$ and $y$ directions at the center point are also shown in Figure 6(a), which can be fitted by an eighth-order super-Gaussian distribution. The far-field results for the system are shown in Figure 6(b). At the output of the laser system, a thin lens with 1-m focal length was adopted for the far-field measurements. The far-field beam width is 0.133 mm (full width at half maximum), and 90% of the far-field energy is concentrated within the two times diffraction limit (TDL).

Figure 6.

(a) Near field and (b) far field profiles of the multi-pass laser amplifier output at 1 Hz, 0.969 J operation. Also shown are the $x$ and $y$ axis cross-sectional profiles.

Figure 7.

Temporal pulse waveforms of the injection seeder source (Seeder), after passing through the regenerative amplifier (Regen), and after passing through the multi-pass amplifier (Multi-pass), with injected (a) square pulse shape and (b) pre-compensation pulse shape.

The temporal pulse waveforms of the entire system are shown in Figure 7; these waveforms were measured with a Tektronix DPO7064B 6G oscilloscope and a Thorlabs DET08CFC high-speed fiber photoelectric detector. When square pulse waveform is injected, the square pulse distortions (SPDs) shown in Figure 7(a), after the two-stage amplifier, were 1.27 and 1.9, respectively. Owing to the arbitrary shaping ability of the front-end seeder system, the output pulse SPD can be compensated by actively adjusting the injected pulse waveform. A satisfactory square temporal pulse waveform in our multi-pass system can then be obtained, as is shown in Figure 7(b).

5 Conclusion and outlook

In conclusion, with the multi-pass ring laser system, 0.969 J laser pulse energy (pulse width: 6 ns; center wavelength: 1053 nm) and $1000\times$ amplification were achieved for 0.9 mJ injected pulse energy. The effective extraction efficiency of the stored energy in the laser gain medium was 33%. The energy stability during 2 h was 2.5%, while the laser system was approximately operated in the saturated regime of the gain medium. The near-field amplitude modulation was 1.4, and 90% of the far-field energy was focused within 2TDL. Finally, we demonstrated that the multi-pass ring amplifier is promising and can be used in preamplifier systems at large-scale laser facilities such as NIF, LMJ and SG II, owing to its high gain, compactness and high extraction efficiency. In addition, owing to the low single-pass small-signal gain of laser diode (LD) heads and high cost of LDs, this structure is more appropriate for the diode-pumped solid-state laser system.

In future experiments, laser heads pumped by LD modules will be employed to demonstrate an MPRA system, which enables us to scale the system to develop high-energy and high-power systems for application in preamplifiers of large-scale laser facilities or pump source systems for petawatt-scale systems.