Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T15:26:20.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stratigraphic paleobiology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2024

Steven M. Holland*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501, U.S.A.
Mark E. Patzkowsky
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-2714, U.S.A.
Katharine M. Loughney
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Watershed Studies Institute, Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky 42071, U.S.A.
*
Corresponding author: Steven M. Holland; Email: stratum@uga.edu

Abstract

Stratigraphic paleobiology uses a modern understanding of the construction of the stratigraphic record—from beds to depositional sequences to sedimentary basins—to interpret patterns and guide sampling strategies in the fossil record. Over the past 25 years, its principles have been established primarily through forward numerical modeling, originally in shallow-marine systems and more recently in nonmarine systems. Predictions of these models have been tested through outcrop-scale and basin-scale field studies, which have also revealed new insights. At multi-basin and global scales, understanding the joint development of the biotic and sedimentary records has come largely from macrostratigraphy, the analysis of gap-bound packages of sedimentary rock. Here, we present recent advances in six major areas of stratigraphic paleobiology, including critical tests in the Po Plain of Italy, mass extinctions and recoveries, contrasts of shallow-marine and nonmarine systems, the interrelationships of habitats and stratigraphic architecture, large-scale stratigraphic architecture, and the assembly of regional ecosystems. We highlight the potential for future research that applies stratigraphic paleobiological concepts to studies of climate change, geochemistry, phylogenetics, and the large-scale structure of the fossil record. We conclude with the need for more stratigraphic thinking in paleobiology.

Information

Type
Invited Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Coding ordination scores of samples and taxa can reveal the origin of the axes, shown with an example from the C2 sequence of the Upper Ordovician of the Cincinnati Arch, USA (data from Holland and Patzkowsky 2007). A, Sample scores coded by lithofacies reveal that detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) axis 1 is correlated with water depth. B, Taxon scores coded by life habit demonstrate that DCA axis 2 is correlated with substrate characteristics, with burrowers associated with soft muds at low axis 2 scores and attached species associated with shelly gravels at high axis 2 scores.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Stratigraphic cross sections showing systems tracts and surfaces in marine and nonmarine settings. A, Cross section is model output from the basin simulation model sedflux (Hutton and Syvitski 2008). FSST, falling-stage systems tract; HST, highstand systems tract; LST, lowstand systems tract; TST, transgressive systems tract. B, Cross section is model output from the basin simulation model strataR (Holland 2022a). Black lines are evenly spaced timelines, which can be used to infer aggradation rates. HAST, high-accommodation systems tract; LAST, low-accommodation systems tract.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Depositional strike and dip, illustrated with the coast of Egypt at the Nile Delta. Map from Google Earth Pro. Depositionally updip areas are toward the sediment source (typically landward), and depositionally downdip areas are distal to the sediment source and therefore more commonly sediment starved.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Patterns of fossil occurrence through two transgressive–regressive sequences. The two sequences each contain 10 high-frequency parasequences, upward-shallowing cycles bounded by flooding surfaces across which water depth increases rapidly. Fifty species having the same peak abundance and depth tolerance but varying in preferred depth are shown sorted by their preferred depths. Dots depict fossil occurrences; solid lines show fossil ranges; and thin dashed gray lines show when species are extant (although possibly not preserved). Fossil occurrences systematically track changes in water depth, and major flooding surfaces (blue lines) have clusters of first and last occurrences. Note that the interval of elevated extinction does not have an obviously greater number of last occurrences. Most species that go extinct during the period of elevated extinction have their last occurrences at two major flooding surfaces immediately below the window of elevated extinction. Other last occurrences are spread through the elevated extinction interval and are not distinguishable from last occurrences caused by changing water depths. The full magnitude of the extinction would not be apparent until the next transgressive–regressive sequence (not shown). The timing of the extinction can be known only by studying correlative columns along the depositional dip.