Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T16:04:20.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elucidating the synergistic mechanism of nickel–molybdenum electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Ian S. McKay
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Jay A. Schwalbe
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Emmett D. Goodman
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Joshua J. Willis
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Arun Majumdar
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Matteo Cargnello*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA SUNCAT Center for Interface Science and Catalysis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Matteo Cargnello at mcargnello@stanford.edu

Abstract

Nickel–molybdenum (Ni–Mo) materials are widely used functional oxide catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction. In this work, we investigate the high activity of Ni–Mo by depositing size-controlled Ni nanocrystals (NCs) onto Mo substrates. We observe a synergistic increase in catalytic activity that does not scale with the Ni–Mo interface length. This evidence points to a bulk electronic interaction of the two metals that is separate from the mechanism of enhancement seen in conventionally co-deposited Ni–Mo electrocatalysts. In addition to elucidating the catalytic behavior of the Ni–Mo system, this work offers a general NC-based paradigm for investigating fundamental interactions and synergistic effects in electrocatalytic materials.

Information

Type
Functional Oxides Research Letters
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a–c) TEM of Ni NCs. Insets at the bottom of each image show histograms of NC size, binned identically on an axis spanning 0–20 nm. (d–f) SEM of NCs as deposited on Mo. (g–i) SEM of NCs as deposited on Ti.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) A high mass-loading yields multiple layers of nominally 5 nm NCs on a glassy carbon substrate. These NCs do not sinter, and appear approximately the same size as identical particles viewed in the TEM [Fig. 1(b)]. (b) A low mass-loading of nominally 7 nm Ni NCs wetting a Mo substrate, viewed at an SEM stage tilt angle of 60°.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Electrocatalytic performance of bare Ti and Mo substrates, as well as medium-sized Ni NC films on both substrates at −0.27 V versus the regular hydrogen electrode (RHE). Current densities are normalized to electrochemical surface areas established using cyclic voltammograms at different scan rates, as described by many authors.[30]

Figure 3

Figure 4. Electrocatalytic performance of sub-monolayer films of small, medium, and large Ni NC on both (a) Ti and (b) Mo substrates at −0.27 V versus RHE. The different size dependence on Ti versus Mo substrates is likely due to the stabilization of reduced Ni by Mo, which allows only the larger particles to maintain both the regions of reduced and oxidized Ni required for a bifunctional catalytic mechanism.[8,14] Normalizing by Ni surface area exaggerates both trends, while normalizing by electrochemical surface area renders the absolute activity consistent with Fig. 3, as shown in the Supplemental Information.

Supplementary material: PDF

McKay supplementary material

McKay supplementary material 1

Download McKay supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2.6 MB