Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T21:45:44.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body composition by 2H dilution in Gambian infants: comparison with UK infants and evaluation of simple prediction methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2009

Jonathan C. K. Wells*
Affiliation:
Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, LondonWC1N 1EH, UK
Kate Hawton
Affiliation:
Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, LondonWC1N 1EH, UK
Tegan Darch
Affiliation:
Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, LondonWC1N 1EH, UK
Peter G. Lunn
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, CambridgeCB2 3DZ, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Jonathan Wells, fax +44 207 831 9903, email J.Wells@ich.ucl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Gambian infants show growth faltering, but the underlying body composition is unknown. The present study aimed to compare body composition in Gambian and UK infants using 2H dilution; and to evaluate accuracy of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and creatinine excretion for estimating lean mass (LM), using 2H as the reference. Body composition was measured in thirty Gambian infants, aged 3–18 months, using (1) anthropometry, (2) 2H, (3) BIA (equation of Fjeld et al.Pediatr Res (1990), 27, 98–102) and (4) 5 h urinary creatinine excretion. Compared with UK reference data, Gambian infants were light, short and had reduced BMI and skinfolds. The subscapular skinfold standard deviation score (SDS) was greater than the triceps SDS (P < 0·01), indicating central fat preservation. Both LM and fat mass were reduced in Gambian infants, with or without adjustment for length. However, whereas the Gambia–UK difference in LM increased with age, that in fat mass decreased. Average creatinine excretion was similar to that expected (95·5 (sd 23·2) % recovery), but LM estimates showed unacceptable error in individuals. BIA using Fjeld's equation overestimated total body water and LM (P < 0·001), hence a new equation was developed, with standard error of 0·47 kg LM. In conclusion, Gambian infants characterised by growth faltering had LM deficits that increased with age. However, adiposity increased with age, and showed indications of a more central distribution than in the reference infants. A new BIA equation for LM prediction is presented; however, creatinine excretion is not recommended for LM estimation in this population.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009
Figure 0

Table 1 Description of age, anthropometry and body composition in the sample

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Difference between lean mass index (LMI) and the age- and sex-specific value expected from the reference data, plotted against age (n 25). The data indicate an initial increasing deficit in the Gambian infants, followed by a relative plateau. This interpretation is supported by the statistics presented in Table 2.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Difference between fat mass index (FMI) and the age- and sex-specific value expected from the reference data, plotted against age (n 25). The data indicate an initial decrease in deficit of the Gambian infants, followed by a relative plateau. This interpretation is supported by the statistics presented in Table 2.

Figure 3

Table 2 Multiple regression analysis of between-population differences in body composition on age

Figure 4

Table 3 Creatinine excretion and predicted body composition(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 5

Fig. 3 Bland–Altman plot of lean mass (LM) by creatinine excretion and 2H dilution in twenty-five infants. Creatinine underestimated LM by − 0·29 (sd 1·30) kg, not significantly different from zero (P = 0·27). However, this lack of significance for this bias was due to the wide limits of agreement in individuals ( ± 2·6 kg).

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Bland–Altman plot of total body water (TBW), measured in twenty infants by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) using the equation of Fjeld et al.(27), and by 2H dilution. BIA overestimated TBW by 0·24 (sd 0·21) kg (P < 0·0001). There was a weak negative correlation between the magnitude of bias and magnitude of TBW (r − 0·28; NS).