Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T02:17:45.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cyclopentadithiophene polymers synthesised via Suzuki-Miyaura polymerisation of MIDA boronate esters

Subject: Chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2020

Josue Ayuso-Carrillo*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon University. 4400 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15213-2617, United States

Abstract

Cyclopentadithiophene (CPDT), a Csp3-bridged bithiophene heteroaromatic unit, displays interesting properties when it is embedded in the repeating units of π-conjugated polymers, and they are applied in organic electronics devices. Common synthetic routes to CPDT-derived polymers rely on toxic methodologies whilst alternative non-toxic strategies such as the Suzuki-Miyaura reaction have been less studied. In this report we demonstrate that the use of a N-methyliminodiacetic acid (MIDA) boronate ester-derived CPDT monomer allows the efficient formation of poly(cyclopentadithiophene) homopolymer under Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction conditions. Thus, the use of MIDA boronate esters might be extended to other organic units to design and construct a plethora of π-conjugated polymers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Supplementary result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Selected results from the Suzuki-Miyaura polymerisation of 1 to form pCPDT.a

Figure 1

Figure 1. GPC traces at different times of 1-derived pCPDT. Crude samples. Reaction conditions as in Table 1.

Figure 2

Scheme 1. Possible synthetic routes for cyclopentadithiophene-derived AB-type monomers for Suzuki-Miyaura polymerisation.

Supplementary material: PDF

Ayuso-Carrillo supplementary material

Ayuso-Carrillo supplementary material

Download Ayuso-Carrillo supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.4 MB
Reviewing editor:  Feng Yan The University of Alabama College of Engineering, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States, 35487-0200
Minor revisions requested

Review 1: Cyclopentadithiophene polymers synthesised via Suzuki-Miyaura polymerisation of MIDA boronate esters

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: The authors report an original and new PCPDT synthesis via Suzuki-Miyaura polymerisation of MIDA boronate esters. The method is well outlined and explained. The results will be of interest and significant benefit for the community working in the synthesis of conjugated polymers especially polythiophenes. The report is, therefore, recommended for publication after some minor revision:(1) PCPDT synthesis via Yamamoto-type homocoupling that starts from dibromoCPDT monomers should be included into the discussion of advantages and shortcomings of the several methods that have been applied for PCPDT generation until now (see e.g. Udom Asawaprom et al. 2001, DOI: 10.1002/1521-3927(20010701)22:10<746::AID-MARC746>3.0.CO;2-H).(2) Please add the solution UV-vis spectra of the PCPDTs of entries 1-3.

Presentation

Overall score 4.4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
3 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.8 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 4.6 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5

Review 2: Cyclopentadithiophene polymers synthesised via Suzuki-Miyaura polymerisation of MIDA boronate esters

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer has written paper with author on the use of N ‐methyliminodiacetic acid boronate esters in Suzuki‐Miyaura cross‐coupling polymerizations of triarylamine and fluorene monomers.

Comments

Comments to the Author: Author has presented a further utilisation of MIDA boronate esters in Suzuki Miyaura polymerizations to produce poly(cyclopentadithiophene) homopolymer. The use of MIDA boronate esters could be applicable to creating a range of pi-conjugated polymers. It would be worthwhile to reference in the introduction the other non-thienyl publication which has made use of MIDA boronate esters in Suzuki Miyaura polymerizations. There was also one minor error in text of the manuscript.Line 9. I think it should read ‘when it is embedded’ or alternatively ‘when embedded’.

Presentation

Overall score 4.7 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.8 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5