Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-lvtpz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-24T04:38:03.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Managing resistance: Evaluating alternative herbicides for glyphosate-resistant smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus) in the Republic of South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2025

Nhlanhla M. Shabangu
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa
Nonduduzo A. Simelane
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Student, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa
Carl F. Reinhardt
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa
Diana Marais
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa
Barend J. Vorster*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa Associate Professor, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa
*
Corresponding author: Barend J. Vorster, Associate Professor, Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Lynnwood Rd, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa (Email: juan.vorster@up.ac.za)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Herbicide resistance poses a significant challenge due to the increasing number of weeds resistant to multiple sites of action (SOAs). Recently, smooth pigweed populations resistant to glyphosate have been confirmed in the KwaZulu-Natal Province in the Republic of South Africa (RSA). This study evaluated herbicide products with different SOAs to provide alternative options for controlling glyphosate-resistant (GR) smooth pigweed populations. Dose-response assays for preemergence and postemergence herbicides were conducted under glasshouse conditions at the University of Pretoria, RSA. Seeds of GR smooth pigweed populations from Bergville and Winterton, and a glyphosate-susceptible (GS) population from Hendrina, were used. For the evaluation of preemergence herbicides (mesotrione, atrazine, imazethapyr, and acetochlor), seeds were sown in pots and herbicides were applied 12 hours after sowing. Postemergence herbicides (mesotrione, atrazine, tembotrione and atrazine tank mixture, and chlorimuron-ethyl) were tested on potted plants at the 6-leaf stage. Herbicides were applied at 0×, 0.5×, 1×, 2×, and 4×, where × is the recommended field rate for the herbicide products representing each SOA. Preemergence herbicides provided greater than 90% control across all populations. For postemergence herbicides, mesotrione effectively controlled all the GR populations, whereas the GS population from Hendrina exhibited reduced sensitivity (>50% survival). Atrazine was effective at rates higher than the recommended field rate in the GR populations. The tank mixture of tembotrione and atrazine had an additive effect compared to the sole application of mesotrione and atrazine. Chlorimuron-ethyl was only effective on the GS population. These results suggest that incorporating effective preemergence and postemergence herbicides into weed management programs could improve control of GR populations of smooth pigweed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America