Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T02:18:07.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dehydrated thin film media to rapidly estimate bioburden for planetary protection flight implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2023

Zachary S. Dean*
Affiliation:
Biotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Kristina Stott
Affiliation:
Biotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Wayne Schubert
Affiliation:
Biotechnology and Planetary Protection Group, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Emily P. Seto
Affiliation:
Planetary Protection, Contamination Control, and Research, Honeybee Robotics, Altadena, CA 91001, USA
Sailaja Chandrapati
Affiliation:
Neogen Corporation, Lansing, MI 48912, USA
*
Corresponding author: Zachary S. Dean; Email: zachary.s.dean@jpl.nasa.gov
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Planetary Protection (PP) is the practice of safeguarding solar system bodies from terrestrial biological contamination and screening the Earth against potentially harmful extraterrestrial biological contamination. On Earth, cleanrooms and spacecraft surfaces are assayed using swabs and wipes that are then heat shocked for 15 min at 80°C to select for spores. The samples are further processed using the pour-plate method and Petri plates (TSA plates), with trypticase soy agar (TSA) serving as the growth medium. This sampling and processing procedure, called the NASA Standard Assay (NSA), is used by PP engineers around the world. Recent years have seen an increase in the incorporation of state-of-the-art technology, such as membrane filtration, into the NSA, with a push for implementing environmentally friendly technology into day-to-day activities. Dehydrated thin film media, such as Petrifilm Rapid Aerobic Count (RAC) plates, suit these goals as an alternative method to TSA plates. RAC plates show bacterial growth (and distinguish colonies from foreign particles such as bubbles) faster than TSA plates due to the incorporation of chromogenic colour indicators in the media. RAC plates also possess a much smaller environmental footprint than TSA plates, and are designed to evaluate even some of the challenging-to-detect environmental organisms, including spreaders that fill over 25% of the plate area in only a few hours. With these benefits in mind the PP Group at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory took on the task of comparing RAC plates directly to TSA plates within the context of the NSA. Not only were the RAC plates able to detect surface environmental samples and in vitro spiked samples equivalent to NSA-processed TSA plates, but spreader organisms were countable on RAC plates at culture densities 10- to 100-fold greater than on TSA plates. In addition, RAC plates showed a robust, linear detection capability when challenged with membrane filter incorporation and organisms were easily acquired from RAC plates for archiving or post-processing experiments including MALDI-TOF bacterial identification. With their ease of use, small footprint, and both rapid and accurate bioburden measurements, RAC plates have the potential to overcome limitations posed by current PP culturing protocols.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. The process flow to directly compare RAC and TSA plates. Differences between the two experiments include (a) needing to pour plate TSA and make the plates for each NSA, where (b) RAC plates are pre-made. TSA plates are also manually counted for the NSA (a), and RAC plates are automatically counted using the Petrifilm Plate Reader Advanced (b). *The RAC plates were counted for 72 h to directly compare RAC and TSA plates in this experiment (the results for which can be seen in Fig. 2), but RAC plates should be evaluated at only 24–48 h due to chromogenic indicators that highlight small colonies from dirt or background media.

Figure 1

Figure 2. 10, 20, 100, 250 CFUs of B. atrophaeus spores were counted at 24, 48 and 72-h on both RAC and TSA plates. At each CFU target, no significant change was detected over time regardless of the plate type. In addition, a small difference in CFUs (between 0.4 and 27 average) was detected on the plates at each time point when comparing plate types with each other. (NS, not significant with P > 0.05). 18 replicates were used for each sample, and negative controls included with the plates incorporated blank TSA and RAC plates (which did not grow colonies). Manual counting of 250 CFU plates versus automated counting using the Petrifilm plate reader took an average of 88.51 s versus 6.27 s using the reader. By comparison, manual counting of 10 CFU samples versus automated counting using the Petrifilm plate reader took an average of 4.60 s versus 6.75 s using the reader.

Figure 2

Figure 3. The membrane filtration setup (upper-left) along with the membrane filtration procedure used in the experiments. A protocol similar to this is currently used on Europa Clipper Planetary Protection sample processing (Stott et al., 2022).

Figure 3

Figure 4. The ability of RAC plates to support the growth of a range of B. atrophaeus spores from 10–250 CFUs captured on 0.2 μm membrane filters. The x-axis represents the CFUs added to the membrane filter, and the y-axis represents the number of CFUs acquired from the filters. The error bars shown are ± SEM (dashed lines) and the 95% confidence interval (blue solid lines) with a sample size of at least 5 for each point. 5 replicates were used for each sample, and a table with the data is available in Table S2. Negative controls included DI water filtered and placed on RAC plates.

Figure 4

Table 1. The table of MALDI-TOF results stemming from organisms grown on RAC plates

Figure 5

Figure 5. RAC plates (right), TSA plates (left). Appearance of organisms exhibiting spreader morphology. The images for B. atrophaeus, B. subtilis, and 1736-9-I M2020 Isolate are following incubation at 37°C for 24 h. (P. lactis is pictured after 48 h of incubation at 37°C as spreading did not occur until 48 h.) RAC plates were able to culture distinct colonies at higher dilutions (densities) than TSA plates for all 3 spreader organisms – with B. atrophaeus acting as a non-spreader control for reference. RAC enumerated at 10−5 versus 10−6 for TSA with B. subtilis, 10−4 versus >10−6 for TSA with 1736-9-I M2020 Isolate, and 10−4 versus >10−6 for P. lactis. 3 replicates were performed for each organism, and negative controls for each experiment included blank RAC and TSA plates. The dilutions where individual spreader colonies were distinguishable are highlighted by a blue box surrounding the image.

Supplementary material: File

Dean et al. supplementary material

Dean et al. supplementary material

Download Dean et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.5 MB