Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-9lb97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-26T22:27:15.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revision of the genus Pionosyllis (Polychaeta: Syllidae: Eusyllinae), with a cladistic analysis, and the description of five new genera and two new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Guillermo San Martín ,
Eduardo López  and
María Teresa Aguado
Guillermo San Martín*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Canto Blanco, E-28049, Madrid, Spain
Eduardo López
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Canto Blanco, E-28049, Madrid, Spain
María Teresa Aguado
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Canto Blanco, E-28049, Madrid, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G. San Martín, Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Canto Blanco, E-28049, Madrid, Spain email: guillermo.sanmartin@uam.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pionosyllis Malmgren, 1867 is revised based on a cladistic analysis of the 41 species considered herein as valid, two newly described species in this paper (Basidiosyllis victoriae and Opisthodonta russelli), 11 species from other genera actually belonging, or related to, Pionosyllis, and 13 syllid species from different subfamilies. The phylogenetic analysis is based on 55 characters; a strict consensus of 1200 equally parsimonious trees (length = 314 steps) was obtained. The clades containing species usually included within Pionosyllis are newly named within the frame of a new Linnean classification of the group (except for one, belonging to another subfamily). The diagnosis of Pionosyllis is emended, and five new genera are proposed: Synmerosyllis, Basidiosyllis, Westheidesyllis, Perkinsyllis and Brevicirrosyllis. Paraehlersia San Martín, 2003, proved to be closely related to Pionosyllis. Seven species are transferred to Opisthodonta Langerhans, 1879, here emended, and three transferred to Nudisyllis Knox & Cameron, 1970 (according to San Martín & Hutchings, 2006). Opisthodonta uraga (Imajima, 1966) comb. nov. and Perkinsyllis longisetosa comb. nov. are redescribed. Pionosyllis compacta Malmgren, 1867, P. stylifera Ehlers, 1913, P. gigantea Moore, 1908, P. enigmatica (Wesenberg-Lund, 1950), and Nudisyllis magnidens (Day, 1953) comb. nov., are redescribed. Pionosyllis marquesensis Monro, 1939 and P. procera Hartman, 1965 likely belong to the Syllinae, thus they are not treated in the taxonomic account.

Keywords

revisionPionosylliscladistic analysisfive new generatwo new species

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 89 , Issue 7 , November 2009 , pp. 1455 - 1498
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aguado, M.T., Capa, M. and San Martín, G. (2003) The genus Chrysopetalum Ehlers, 1864 (Annelida: Polychaeta: Chrysopetalidae) in the Pacific coast of Panamá. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 116, 82–95.Google Scholar
Aguado, M.T. and San Martín, G. (2004) Pisionidae from Coiba National Park with the description of a new species and two new reports of Pisione. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 84, 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aguado, M.T. and San, Martín G. (2006) Sílidos intersticiales (Syllidae: Polychaeta) del Parque Nacional de Coiba (Pacífico, Panamá). Revista de Biologia Tropical 54, 725–743.Google Scholar
Augener, H. (1913) Die Fauna Südwest-Australiens. Polychaeta. Errantia. Sedentaria. Ergebnisse des Hamburger Südwest-australischen Forschungreise 1905 4, 65–304.Google Scholar
Augener, H. (1924) Polychaeta II. Polychaeten von Neusseland. I Errantia. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening Kjøbenhavn 75, 241–441.Google Scholar
Augener, H. (1927) Polychaeten von Südost- und Süd-Australien. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening y Kjobenhavn 83, 71–275.Google Scholar
Averincev, V.G. (1982) Seasonal variations in the sublittoral polychaetes fauna (Polychaeta) of the Davis Sea. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Zoological Institute 28, 4–70. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Banse, K. (1959) Über die Polychaeten-Besiedlung einiger submariner Höhlen. Ergebnisse der Österreichischen Tyrrhenia-Expedition 1952. Teil XII. Publicazzioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli 30 (Supplement), 417–469.Google Scholar
Banse, K. and Hobson, K.D. (1974) Benthic errantiate polychaetes of British Columbia and Washington. Bulletin of the Fisheries Resources Board of Canada 185, 1–111.Google Scholar
Baratech, L. and San Martín, G. (1987) Contribución al conocimiento de los Anélidos Poliquetos (Annelida: Polychaeta) de las costas andaluzas. Boletín del Instituto Español de Oceanografía 45, 37–48.Google Scholar
Ben-Eliahu, N.M. (1977) Polychaete cryptofauna from rims of similar intertidal vermetid reefs on the Mediterranean Coast of Israel and in the Gulf of Elat: Syllinae and Eusyllinae (Polychaeta Errantia: Syllidae). Israel Journal of Zoology 26, 1–58.Google Scholar
Benham, W.B. (1927) British Antarctic (Terra Nova) Expedition Natural History Report: Polychaeta. Natural History Reports of Zoology 7, 47–182.Google Scholar
Campoy, A. (1982) Fauna de España. Fauna de Anélidos Poliquetos de la Península Ibérica. Pamplona: EUNSA (Ediciones de la Universidad de Navarra, S.A.), Pamplona, 781 pp.Google Scholar
Capa, M., San Martín, G. and López, E. (2001) Autolytinae, Eusyllinae y Exogoninae (Syllidae: Polychaeta) del Parque Nacoinal de Coiba, Panamá. Revista de Biología Tropical 49, 621–628.Google ScholarPubMed
Capaccioni, R. and San Martín, G. (1989) Pionosyllis anophthalma n. sp. a new Syllidae (Polychaeta) from the Spanish Mediterranean coasts. Oebalia 16, 41–48.Google Scholar
Cognetti, G. (1957) I Sillidi del golfo di Napoli. Publicazzioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli 30, 1–100.Google Scholar
Czerniavsky, V. (1881) Materialia ad zoographiam Ponticam comparatam. Bulletin de la Société Impériale des Naturalistes de Moscou 55, 213–363. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Day, J.H. (1953) The Polychaete fauna of South Africa. Part 2. Errant species from cape shores and estuaries. Annals of the Natal Museum 12, 397–441.Google Scholar
Day, J.H. (1967) Polychaeta of southern Africa. Part I. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History), London, 878 pp.Google Scholar
Day, J.H. (1973) New Polychaeta from Beaufort, with a key to all species recorded from North Carolina. Seattle: NOAA Technical Reports–NMFS, 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, Z. and Westheide, W. (1997) New records and descriptions of tidal and subtidal Syllid species (Polychaeta) from Chinese coast. Bulletin of Marine Science 60, 277–292.Google Scholar
Ehlers, E. (1897) Polychaeten. Ergebnisse der Hamburger Magalhaenischen Sammelreise Leifersung 2, 1–148, pls. 1–9.Google Scholar
Ehlers, E. (1913) Die Polychaeten-Sammlungen der deutschen Südpolar-Expedition, 1901–1903. Deutsche Südpolar-Expedition 13, 397–598, pls. 26–46.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. (1977) The Polychaete worms. Definitions and keys to the orders, families and genera. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum and Allan Hancock Foundation.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P. (1923) Faune de France. 5. Polychètes Errantes. Paris: Paul Lechevalier, 486 pp.Google Scholar
Gardiner, S.L. (1976) Errant polychaete annelids from North Carolina. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 91, 77–220.Google Scholar
Gidholm, G. (1962) Sur quelques polychètes syllidiens des sables de la région de Roscoff avec la description de deux nouvelles espèces. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 3, 249–260.Google Scholar
Glasby, C.J. (1993) Family revision and cladistic analysis of the Nereidoidea (Polychaeta: Phyllodocida). Invertebrate Taxonomy 7, 1551–1573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Góngora-Garza, G. and de León González, J.A. (1993) Dos nuevos sílidos (Polychaeta: Syllidae) y nuevos registros para México. Con una clave a las especies de sílidos del Pacífico Mexicano. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 34, 17–28.Google Scholar
Gravier, C. (1906) Sur les Annélides Polychètes recueillies par l'expédition Antarctique Française (Syllidiens). Bulletin du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 12, 283–290.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1948) The polychaetous annelids of Alaska. Pacific Science 2, 1–58.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1953) Non-pelagic Polychaeta of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 1901–1903. Further Zoological Results of the Swedish Antarctic Expedition 4, 1–83.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1959) Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world. Part 1. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications Occasional Papers 23, 1–353.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1964) Polychaeta errantia of Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series 3, 1–131.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1965) Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world. Supplement 1960–65 and index. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications Occasional Papers 23, 1–197.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1967) Polychaetous annelids collected by the USNS Eltanin and Staten Islands cruises, chiefly from Antarctic Seas. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology 2, 1–385.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1969) Atlas of the errantiate polychaetous annelids from California. Los Angeles: Allan Hancock Foundation, 828 pp.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1956) Teil 2: Die Polychaeten des Sublitorals. Zur Kenntnis des Sublitorals der Chilenischen Küste unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 62, 59–305.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1958) Einige Polychaeten aus dem Küstengrundwasser der Bimini-Inseln (Bahamas). Kieler Meeresforschungen 14, 233–240.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1959) Zur Ökologie der Polychaeten des Mangrove-Estero-Gebietes von El Salvador. Beiträge zur Neotropischen Fauna 1, 70–183.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1960) Polychaeten aus dem Roten Meer. Kieler Meeresforschungen 16, 69–125.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1965) Die Polychaeten des Sublitorals. Zur Kenntnis des Sublitorals des Chilenischen Küste unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 162 (Supplement), 1–384.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1971) Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 58. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 594 pp.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1974) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der afrikanischen Westküste zwischen Angola und Kap der Gutten Hoffnung und der afrikanischen Ostküste von Südafrika und Mocambique unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 69, 95–228.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1977) Polychaeten aus dem Sublitoral und Bathyal vor der portugiesischen und marokkanischen Küste Auswertung der Fahrt 8 (1967) von F.S. ‘Meteor’. ‘Meteor’ Forschungen Ergebnisse 26, 65–99.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1979) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 2. Die Polychaeten der tropischen Nordwestküste Australiens (zwischen Derby im Norden und Port Hedland im Süden). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 76, 77–218.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1980a) Amsterdam Expeditions to the West Indian Islands. Report 9. Die Polychaeten der Amsterdam-Expeditionen nach Westindien. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde 50, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1980b) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 4. Die Polychaeten der tropischen Nordwestküste Australiens (zwischen Port Samson im Norden Und Exmouth im Süden). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 77, 42–110.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1981) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 6. Die Polychaeten der tropisch-subtropischen Westküste Australiens (Zwischen Exmouth im Norden und Cervantes im Süden). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 78, 19–96.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1982) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 8. Die Polychaeten der subtropisch-antiborealen Westküste Australiens (Zwischen Cervantes im Norden und Cape Naturaliste im Süden). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 79, 51–118.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1983) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 9. Die Polychaeten der antiborealen Südwestküste Australiens (zwischen Dunsborough im Norden und Denmark im Süden). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 80, 123–167.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1984) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 10. Die Polychaeten der antiborealen Südküste Australiens (Zwischen Albany im Westen und Ceduna im Osten). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 81, 7–62.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1985) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 11. Die Polychaeten der antiborealen Südküste Australiens (zwischen Port Lincoln im Westen und Port Ausgusta im Osten). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 82, 61–99.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1986) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 12. Die Polychaeten der antiborealen Südküste Australiens (zwischen Walaroo im Westen und Port MacDonnell im Osten). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 83, 31–70.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1987) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 13. Die Polychaeten der antiborealen Küste von Victoria (Australien) (zwischen Warrnambool im Westen und Port Welshpool im osten). Mitteilungen uas dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 84, 27–66.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1990) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Die Polychaeten der subtropisch-tropischen und tropischen Ostküste Australiens zwischen Lake Macquarie (New South Wales) im Süden und Gladstone (Queensland) im Norden. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 87, 41–87.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1991) Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Küsten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Teil 16. Die Polychaeten der subtropisch-tropisch bis tropisch Ostküste Australiens zwischen Maclean (New South Wales) und Gladstone (Queensland) sowie von Heron Island (Großes Barriere-Riff). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 88, 17–71.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1992) Die Polychaeten der Amsterdam-Expedition nach der Insel Ascension (Zentral Atlantik). Bijdragen tot der Dierkunde 61, 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. (1996) Annelida, Borstenwürmer, Polychaeta. Die Tierwelt Deutschlands, 58. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 648 pp.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G and Rosenfeldt, P. (1988) Die Polychaeten der ‘Polarstern’—Reise ANT III/2 in die Antarktis 1984. Teil 1: Euphrosinidae bis Chaetopteridae. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 85, 25–72.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G and Rosenfeldt, P. (1990) Die Polychaeten der ‘Walter Herwig’—Reise 68/1 nach Elephant Island (Antarktis) 1985. Teil 1: Aphroditidae bis Cirratulidae. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 87, 89–122.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G and Rosenfeldt, P. (1992) Die Polychaeten der ‘Polarstern’—Reise ANT V/1 in die Antarktis 1986. Teil 1: Euphrosinidae bis Iphitimidae. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut 89, 85–124.Google Scholar
Haswell, W.A. (1886) Observations on some Australian Polychaeta. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 10, 733–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haswell, W.A. (1920) Australian Syllidae, Eusyllidae and Autolytidae. Journal of the Linnean Society of London 24, 90–112.Google Scholar
Imajima, M. (1966) The Syllidae (polychaetous annelids) from Japan (III). Eusyllinae. Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Laboratory 14, 85–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imajima, M. and Hartman, O. (1964) The polychaetous annelids of Japan. Parts I, II. Allan Hancock Foundation Occasional Papers 26, 1–452.Google Scholar
Jiménez, M., San Martín, G. and López, E. (1994) Redescription of Pionosyllis neapolitana Goodrich, 1900 and Pionosyllis nutrix Monro, 1936, referred to the genus Grubeosyllis Verrill, 1900 (Polychaeta, Syllidae, Exogoninae). Polychaete Research 16, 52–55.Google Scholar
Jiménez, M., San Martín, G. and López, E. (1995) Pionosyllis maxima Monro, 1930, P. anops Hartman, 1953, and P. epipharynx Hartman, 1953, redescribed as Eusyllis maxima (Monro, 1930), a new combination (Polychaeta: Syllidae: Eusyllinae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 108, 496–501.Google Scholar
Keferstein, W. (1862) Beiträge zur Kenntnis einiger Anneliden. Zeitschrift für Wissenschftliche Zoologie 12, 93–129.Google Scholar
Kitching, I.J., Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.H. and Williams, D. (1998) The theory and practice of parsimony analysis. The Systematics Association, Publication 2. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knox, G.A. (1951) The polychaetous annelids of Banks Peninsula. Part 2. A rock bottom fauna from 80 fathoms. Records of the Canterbury Museum 6, 61–81.Google Scholar
Knox, G.A. (1960) Biological results of the Chatman Islands 1954 Expedition. Part 3. Polychaeta errantia. Memoirs of the New Zealand Oceanography Institute 6, 77–143.Google Scholar
Knox, G.A. and Cameron, D.B. (1970) Polychaeta from the Snares Islands, New Zealand. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 12, 73–85Google Scholar
Knox, G.A. and Cameron, D.B. (1998) The marine fauna of the Ross Sea: Polychaeta. Wellington, New Zealand: National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA).Google Scholar
Krohn, A. 1852. Ueber Syllis pulligera eine neue Art. Archivs für Naturgeschungen 18, 251–254.Google Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. and Harris, L.H. (1995) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa María Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. Vol. 5. The Annelida Part 2. 1 Family Syllidae Grube, 1850. Santa Barbara: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
Langerhans, P. (1879) Die Würmfauna von Madeira. Zeitschrift fur Wissenschaftliche Zoologie 32, 513–592, pls. 31–33.Google Scholar
Langerhans, P. (1881) Ueber einige canarische Anneliden. Nova Acta Leopoldina 42, 93–124.Google Scholar
Laubier, L. (1966) Le coralligène de l'Albères. Monographie biocenotique. Annales de l'Institut Océanographique 43, 137–316.Google Scholar
Laubier, L. (1967) Adaptations chez les Annélides Polychètes interstitielles. Anné Biologique 6, 1–16.Google Scholar
Laubier, L. (1968) Contribution a la faunistique du coralligène. VII—a propos de quelques Annélides Polychètes rares ou nouvelles (Chrysopetalidae, Syllidae et Spionidae). Annales de l'Institut Océanographique 46, 79–144.Google Scholar
Licher, F. (1999) Revision der Gattung Typosyllis Langerhans, 1879 (Polychaeta: Syllidae). Morphologie, Taxonomie und Philogenie. Abhandlungen Der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 551, 1–336.Google Scholar
López, E., Britayev, T.A., Martín, D. and San Martín, G. (2001) New symbiotic association involving Syllidae (Annelida: Polychaeta), with taxonomic and biologic remarks on Pionosyllis magnifica and Syllis cf. armillaris. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 399–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, E. and San Martín, G. (1994) Syllidae (Polychaeta) recolectados en las islas de Cabo Verde por la ‘I Expedición Ibérica’. Revista de Biología Tropical 42, 129–139.Google Scholar
López, E., San Martín, G. and Jiménez, M. (1997) Two new species of Syllidae (Polychaeta) from the Chafarinas Islands (Alborán Sea, SW Mediterranean). Bulletin of Marine Science 60, 293–299.Google Scholar
Malmgren, A.J. (1867) Annulata Polychaeta Spetsbergiae Groenlandiae, Islandiae et Scandinaviae hactenus cognita. Ofversigt af Svenska Vatenskaps Academiens Förhandlinger 24, 1–127.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W.C. (1885) Report on the scientific results of the exploring voyage of H. M. S. Challenger 1873–76. Zoology 12, 1–554.Google Scholar
Monro, C.C.A. (1930) Polychaete worms. Discovery Reports 2, 1–122.Google Scholar
Monro, C.C.A. (1936) Polychaete worms II. Discovery Reports 12, 59–198.Google Scholar
Monro, C.C.A. (1939) Polychaeta. B. A. N. Z. Antarctic Research Expedition 1929–1931 Reports 4, 89–156.Google Scholar
Moore, J.P. (1906) Additional new species of Polychaeta from the north Pacific. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia 58, 217–260.Google Scholar
Moore, J.P. (1908) Some polychaetous annelids of the northern Pacific coast of North America. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia 60, 321–364.Google Scholar
Moore, J.P. (1909) The polychaetous annelids dredged by the ‘Albatross’ off the coast of California in 1904. I. Syllidae, Sphaerodoridae, Hesionidae, Phyllodocidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science, Philadelphia 61, 321–351.Google Scholar
Moore, J.P. (1923) The Polychaetous Annelids dredged by the U. S. S. ‘Albatross’ off the coast of Southern California in 1904. IV. Spionidae to Sabellariidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 75, 179–259.Google Scholar
Nixon, C. (1999) The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Núñez, J., Riera, R., Brito, M.C. and Pascual, M. (2001) Presencia del poliqueto intersticial Pionosyllis homocirrata (Hartmann-Schröder, 1958) (Polychaeta: Syllidae: Eusyllinae) en playas expuestas de Tenerife (islas Canarias). Revista de la Acaddemia Canaria de Ciencias 13, 61–66.Google Scholar
Núñez, J. and San Martín, G. (1991) Two new species of Syllidae (Polychaeta) from Tenerife (Canary Islands, Spain). Bulletin of Marine Science 48, 236–241.Google Scholar
Núñez, J. and San Martín, G. (1996) Anélidos Poliquetos de las islas Canarias: Familia Syllidae, I. Subfamilias Eusyllinae y Autolytinae. In Oceanografía y Recursos Marinos en el Atlántico Centro-Oriental, 199–222.Google Scholar
Núñez, J., San Martín, G. and Brito, M.C. (1992) Exogoninae (Polychaeta: Syllidae) from the Canary Islands. Scientia Marina 56, 43–52.Google Scholar
Núñez, J. and Talavera, J.A. (1995) Fauna of the polychaetous annelids from Madeira. Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal (Historia Natural) Supplement 4, 511–530.Google Scholar
Nygren, A. (1999) Phylogeny and reproduction in Syllidae (Polychaeta). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 126, 365–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygren, A. (2004) Revision of Autolytinae (Syllidae: Polychaeta). Zootaxa 680, 1–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nygren, A. and Sundberg, P. (2003) Phylogeny and evolution of reproductive modes in Autolytinae (Syllidae, Annelida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29, 235–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parapar, J., San Martín, G., Urgorri, V. and Besteiro, C. (1993) Anélidos Poliquetos mesopsámmicos sublitorales de la costa de Ceuta (España). Cahiers de Biologie Marine 34, 363–381.Google Scholar
Pérès, J.M. (1954) Contribution à l'étude des Annélides Polychètes de la Méditerranée occidentale. Recueil des Travaux de la Station Marine d'Endoume 13, 83–155.Google Scholar
Perkins, T.H. (1981) Syllidae (Polychaeta), principally from Florida, with descriptions of a new genus and twenty-one new species. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 93, 1080–1172.Google Scholar
Pettibone, M.H. (1954) Marine polychaete worms from Point Barrow, Alaska, with additional records from the North Atlantic and North Pacific. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 103, 203–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierantoni, U. (1905) Una nuova maniera di gestazione esterna della Pionosyllis pulligera Krohn. Annales di Museo di Zoologia della Università di Napoli, n. Ser. 2, 1–10.Google Scholar
Pleijel, F. and Dahlgren, T. (1998) Position and delineation of Chrysopetalidae and Hesionidae (Annelida, Polychaeta, Phyllodocida). Cladistics 14, 129–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rouse, G. and Fauchald, K. (1997) Cladistics and polychaetes. Zoologica Scripta 26, 139–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, G. and Pleijel, F. (2001) Polychaetes. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 354 pp.Google Scholar
de Saint-Joseph, B. (1886) Annélides Polychètes des Côtes de Dinard. Annales des Sciences Naturelles (Zoologie et Paléontologie) 1, 127–270.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (1984) Estudio biogeográfico, faunístico y sistemático de los poliquetos de la familia Sílidos (Syllidae: Polychaeta) en Baleares. Madrid: Publicaciones de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 187, 581 pp.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (1990) Eusyllinae (Syllidae, Polychaeta) from Cuba and Gulf of México. Bulletin of Marine Science 46, 590–619.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (1991a) Grubeosyllis and Exogone (Exogoninae, Syllidae, Polychaeta) from Cuba, the Gulf of México, Florida and Puerto Rico, with a revision of Exogone. Bulletin of Marine Science 49, 715–740.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (1991b) A new species of Pionosyllis Malmgren, 1867 (Polychaeta: Syllidae: Eusyllinae), from Cuba. Graellsia 47, 17–20.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (2003) Annelida, Polychaeta II: Syllidae. In Ramos, M.A., Alba, J., Bellés, X., Gosólbez, J., Guerra, A., Macpherson, E., Martin, F., Serrano, J. and Templado, J. (eds) Fauna Ibérica 21. Madrid: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales. CSIC, 554 pp.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. (2005) Exogoninae (Polychaeta, Syllidae) from Australia (with the description of a new genus and twenty-two new species). Records of the Australian Museum 57, 39–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Martín, G. and Estapé, S. (1993) Redescription of Pionosyllis procera Hartman, 1965 (Syllidae: Polychaeta) and comments about its reproduction and systematic position. Revista de Biología Tropical 41, 227–231.Google Scholar
San Martín, G. and Parapar, J. (1997) ‘Errant’ polychaetes of the Livingston Islands shelf (South Shetland, Antarctica), with the description of a new species. Polar Biology 17, 502–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Martín, G. and Hutchings, P. (2006) Eusyllinae (Polychaeta, Syllidae) from Australia (with the description of a new genus and seventeen new species). Records of the Australian Museum 58, 257–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikes, D.S. and Lewis, P.O. (2001) PAUPRat: PAUP* implementation of the parsimony ratchet. Beta software, version 1. Distributed by the authors. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA.Google Scholar
Southern, R. (1914) Archiannelida and Polychaeta. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Dublin 31, 1–160.Google Scholar
Storch, V. (1966) Drei neue Polychaeten aus dem Litoral des Roten Meeres. Kieler Meeresforschungen 22, 171–175.Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L. (2002) PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other Methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachussets: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Uebelacker, J.M. (1984) Family Syllidae Grube, 1850. In Uebelacker, J.M. and Johnson, PG. (eds) Polychaetes of the Northern Gulf of México. Vol. IV. Mobile: Barry A. Vittor & Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Uschakov, P.V. (1955) Polychaeta of the Far Eastern Seas of the U. S. S. R. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. [Translated from Russian to English, 1965 by Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.]Google Scholar
Uschakov, P.V. and Wu, B.L. (1960) Preliminary data on the polychaete fauna of the sea of China. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica 3, 86–93.Google Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, E. (1950) Polychaeta. Danish INGOLF-Expedition Copenhagen 4, 1–92.Google Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, E. (1961) Reports on the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–49. Polychaeta errantia. Lunds Universitats Årsskrift N. F. Avd. 2 57, 1–139.Google Scholar
Westheide, W. (1971) Interstitial polychaetes (excluding Archiannelida). Systematics and ecology of meiofauna taxa. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 76, 57–70.Google Scholar
Westheide, W. (1974) Interstitielle Fauna von Galapagos. XI. Pisionidae, Pilargidae, Syllidae (Polychaeta). Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 44, 195–338.Google Scholar
Westheide, W. (1987) Progenesis as a principle in meiofauna evolution. Journal of Natural History 21, 843–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westheide, W. (1988) Polychaeta. In Higgings, R.P and Thiel, H. (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Washington: Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology.Google Scholar