Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T03:43:36.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The population status of chameleons within Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar, and recommendations for future monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2009

Richard K. B. Jenkins ,
Lee D. Brady ,
Kieron Huston ,
Juliet L. D. Kauffmann ,
Jeanneney Rabearivony ,
Georges Raveloson  and
J. Marcus Rowcliffe
Richard K. B. Jenkins
Affiliation:
School of Pure and Applied Biology, University of Wales, PO Box 915, Cardiff, CF1 3TL, UK
Kieron Huston
Affiliation:
Surrey Wildlife Trust, Pirbright, Surrey, UK
Juliet L. D. Kauffmann
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Jeanneney Rabearivony
Affiliation:
Universite d'Antananarivo, Madagascar
Georges Raveloson
Affiliation:
Universite d'Antananarivo, Madagascar
J. Marcus Rowcliffe
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

Malagasy chameleons are threatened by the relentless pace of habitat destruction. Their great popularity amongst herpetoculturalists has also resulted in collection for international animal markets. Most previous fieldwork has focused on the compilation of much needed species inventories, but little attention has been given to estimating chameleon population densities. This lack of information prevents a reliable assessment of the effects ofhabitat loss and direct exploitation on wild populations. A simple and repeatable methodology for the monitoring of chameleon populations is therefore urgently required. The present study developed survey techniques based on distance sampling within an area of relatively undisturbed rain forest at Ranomafana National Park. In total 394 individuals from six species were recorded and population densities (± SE) of 27.2 ± 5.4/ha Brookesia spp. and 21.4±4.0/ha Calumma spp. were estimated using the computer program DISTANCE. The authors propose that monitoring of chameleons in areas subject to different threats should begin immediately using the methods outlined in this paper.

Keywords

ChameleonMadagascarpopulation densityrain foresttrade

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Oryx , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , January 1999 , pp. 38 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Fauna and Flora International 1999

References

Allen, C.M. & Edwards, S.R.(1995) The sustainable-use debate: observations from IUCN. Oryx, 29, 92–98.Google Scholar
Andreone, F. (1994) The amphibians of Ranomafana rain forest, Madagascar—preliminary community analysis and conservation considerations. Oryx, 28, 207–214.Google Scholar
Behra, O. (1993) The export of reptiles and amphibians from Madagascar. TRAFFIC Bulletin, 13, 115–116.Google Scholar
Blomberg, S. & Shine, R. (1996) Reptiles. In Ecological Census Techniques. A Handbook (ed. Sutherland, W.J.), pp. 218–226. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Böhme, W. (1997) Eine neue Chamäleonart aus der Calumma gastrotaenia—Verwandtschaft Ost-Madagaskars. Herpetofauna, 19, 5–10 [in German].Google Scholar
Brady, L.D., Huston, K., Jenkins, R.K.B., Kauffmann, J.L.D., Rabearivony, J., Raveloson, G.& Rowcliffe, M. (1996) UEA Madagascar Expedition '93. Final Report. Unpublished Report, University of East Anglia, Norwich.Google Scholar
Brygoo, E.R. (1971) Reptiles Sauriens Chamaeleonidae. Genre Chamaeleo. Faune de Madagascar, 33, 1–318 [in French].Google Scholar
Brygoo, E.R. (1978) Reptiles Sauriens Chamaeleonidae. Genre Brookesia et complément pour le genre Chamaeleo. Faune de Madagascar, 47, 1–173 [in French].Google Scholar
Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P. & Laake, J.L.(1993) Distance Sampling. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
Bustard, R.(1989) Keeping and breeding oviparous chameleons. British Herpetological Society Bulletin, 27, 18–33.Google Scholar
CITES Secretariat (1995) Significant Trade in Animal Species included in Appendix II. Recommendations of the Standing Committee. Notification to the Parties No. 833, Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, Gland.Google Scholar
Gittens, S.P. (1987) The diet of the common toad (Bufo bufo) around a pond in Mid-Wales. Amphibia-Reptilia, 8, 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaw, F. & Vences, M. (1992) A Fieldguide to the Amphibians and Reptiles of Madagascar, 1st edn.M. Vences and F. Glaw, Cologne.Google Scholar
Glaw, F. & Vences, M. (1994) A Fieldguide to the Amph and Reptiles of Madagascar, 2nd edn.M. Vences and F. Glaw, Cologne.Google Scholar
Greenberg, C.H., Neary, D.G. & Harris, L.D. (1994) A comparison of herpetofaunal sampling effectiveness of pitfall, single-ended, and double-ended funnel traps used with drift fences. Journal of Herpetology, 28, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heydon, M. J. & Bulloh, P. (1996) The impact of selective logging on sympatric civet species in Borneo. Oryx, 30, 31–36.Google Scholar
IUCN/SSC (Species Survival Commission of the World Conservation Union) Trade Specialist Group, BIODEV, IUCN/ SSC Madagascar Reptile and Amphibian Specialist Group (1993) A Preliminary Review of the Distribution and Status of Reptile and Amphibian Species exported from Madagascar. Joint Nature Conservation Committee Report, Peterborough.Google Scholar
Kauffmann, J. (1994) Veldwaarnemingen aan Calumma brevicornis en C. oshaughnessyi ambreensis op Madagascar. Lacerta, 53, 2–10 [in Dutch].Google Scholar
Kauffmann, J.L.D., Brady, L.D. & Jenkins, R.K.B. (1997) Behavioural observations of the chameleon Calumma oshaughnessyi in Madagascar. Herpetological Journal, 7, 77–80.Google Scholar
Krebs, C.J. (1989) Ecological Methodology. Harper Collins, New York.Google Scholar
Kremen, C. (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications, 2, 203–217.Google Scholar
Laake, J.L., Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R. & Burnham, K.P. (1993) DISTANCE User's Guide. Version 2.0. Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado State University, Fort Collins.Google Scholar
Lancia, R.A., Nichols, J.D. & Pollock, K.H. (1996) Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations. In Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitat, 5th edn (ed. Bookout, T. A.), pp. 215–253. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
O'Shea, M. (1992) Expedition Field Techniques. Reptiles and Amphibians. Expedition Advisory Centre, London.Google Scholar
Parcher, S.P. (1974) Observation on the natural histories of six Malagasy Chamaeleontidae. Zeitschrift Tierpsychol, 34, 500–523.Google Scholar
Raxworthy, C.J. (1988) Reptiles, rainforests and conservation in Madagascar. Biological Conservation, 43, 181–211.Google Scholar
Raxworthy, C.J. (1991) Field observations on some dwarf chameleons (Brookesia spp.) from rainforest areas of Madagascar. Journal of Zoology, London, 224, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raxworthy, C.J. & Nussbaum, R.A. (1994) A rainforest survey of amphibians, reptiles and small mammals at Montagne d'Ambre National Park, Madagascar. Biological Conservation, 69, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raxworthy, C.J. & Nussbaum, R.A. (1995) Systematics, speciation and biogeography of the dwarf chameleons (Brookesia; Reptilia, Squamata, Chamaeleontidae) of northern Madagascar. Journal of Zoology, London, 235, 525–528.Google Scholar
Razafimamonjy, D. (1988) Etude d'un écosystème forestier de Ranomafana. In L'Equilibre des Ecosystèmes Forestiers á Madagascar. Actes d'un Séminaire International (Rakotovao, L., Barre, V. and Sayer, J.), pp. 315–319. IUCN, Gland and Cambridge.Google Scholar
de Vosjoli, P. (1990) The General Care and Maintenance of True Chameleons. Part I Husbandry. The Herpetological Library, Lakeside.Google Scholar
World Conservation Monitoring Centre and IUCN/SSC Trade Specialist Group (1991) Review of Significant Trade in Animals included in Appendix II of CITES. Draft Report submitted to the CITES Animal Committee. World Conservation Monitoring Centre and IUCN/SSC Trade Specialist Group, 08 1991.Google Scholar