Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T02:19:29.766Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESTIMATING WAITING TIMES WITH THE TIME-VARYING LITTLE'S LAW

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2013

Song-Hee Kim
Affiliation:
Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 E-mails: sk3116@columbia.edu; ww2040@columbia.edu
Ward Whitt
Affiliation:
Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 E-mails: sk3116@columbia.edu; ww2040@columbia.edu

Abstract

When waiting times cannot be observed directly, Little's law can be applied to estimate the average waiting time by the average number in system divided by the average arrival rate, but that simple indirect estimator tends to be biased significantly when the arrival rates are time-varying and the service times are relatively long. Here it is shown that the bias in that indirect estimator can be estimated and reduced by applying the time-varying Little's law (TVLL). If there is appropriate time-varying staffing, then the waiting time distribution may not be time-varying even though the arrival rate is time varying. Given a fixed waiting time distribution with unknown mean, there is a unique mean consistent with the TVLL for each time t. Thus, under that condition, the TVLL provides an estimator for the unknown mean wait, given estimates of the average number in system over a subinterval and the arrival rate function. Useful variants of the TVLL estimator are obtained by fitting a linear or quadratic function to arrival data. When the arrival rate function is approximately linear (quadratic), the mean waiting time satisfies a quadratic (cubic) equation. The new estimator based on the TVLL is a positive real root of that equation. The new methods are shown to be effective in estimating the bias in the indirect estimator and reducing it, using simulations of multi-server queues and data from a call center.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable