Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-hfkw9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-14T12:10:56.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP): targeted service increases out-patient initiations of clozapine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2026

Zmarak Ahmad Khan Open the ORCID record for Zmarak Ahmad Khan [Opens in a new window] ,
Ioana Varvari ,
Valentina Mancini ,
Chambrez Zita-Zauchenberger ,
Shashwati Kantor ,
Jack B. Fanshawe ,
Sharon Musiiwa ,
Alexandra Pledge ,
Benjamin Pearce  and
Saik J. G. N. de La Motte de Broöns de Vauvert
...Show all authors
Zmarak Ahmad Khan
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Ioana Varvari
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK TUNE-UP Service, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Valentina Mancini
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK University of Oxford Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, UK
Chambrez Zita-Zauchenberger
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK
Shashwati Kantor
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Jack B. Fanshawe
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Sharon Musiiwa
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Alexandra Pledge
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Benjamin Pearce
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Saik J. G. N. de La Motte de Broöns de Vauvert
Affiliation:
Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Digby Quested
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Daniel Maughan
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Joseph Baskerville-Butler
Affiliation:
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Philip McGuire
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
Oliver D. Howes
Affiliation:
Psychosis Studies, South London and Maudsley Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK Department of Psychosis Studies, King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, UK
Toby Pillinger
Affiliation:
Psychosis Studies, South London and Maudsley Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK TUNE-UP Service, South London and Maudsley Mental Health NHS Trust, London, UK
Robert A. McCutcheon*
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK TUNE-UP Service, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK Department of Psychosis Studies, King’s College London Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, UK
*
Correspondence: Robert A. McCutcheon. Email: robert.mccutcheon@psych.ox.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

In the UK, clozapine is the only licensed treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, it is underused because initiation is often limited by the need for in-patient admission, which is costly and unattractive to patients. Community clozapine services may address this.

Aims

To describe a targeted out-patient clinic (Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP)) for TRS management and assess its impact on community clozapine initiation rates.

Method

We reviewed clozapine titrations of patients under four community mental health teams from September 2021 to January 2025, recording whether titration occurred as in- or out-patient. The TUNE-UP clozapine clinic operated for 12 months (September 2023 to September 2024). Initiation rates during the TUNE-UP period were compared with those when the service was unavailable, using Poisson regression. Clinical outcomes were assessed using scales including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

Results

Fifty-one individuals commenced clozapine during the study period. There was a significant increase in the rates of community initiation in the TUNE-UP period (11.0 per year) compared with those outside of this period (1.71 per year; incidence risk ratio 6.42 [95% CI 2.04–20.2, P = 0.0015]). Patients seen by TUNE-UP showed significant improvements in PANSS (n = 6, median improvement 21.5 [95% CI 7.0–33.0], P = 0.03).

Conclusions

A specialist service was associated with a significant increase in community clozapine initiations. This approach offers a strategy to improve TRS treatment in the community.

Keywords

Psychotic disorders/schizophreniacommunity mental health teamsgeneral adult psychiatryantipsychoticsout-patient treatment

Information

Type
Paper
Information
BJPsych Open , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , March 2026 , e73
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Schizophrenia is a psychiatric disorder consisting of positive, negative and cognitive symptoms, and is associated with significant functional impairment. Reference McCutcheon, Keefe and McGuire1 Nearly one in four patients with first-episode psychosis or schizophrenia will develop treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) in the early stages of treatment. Reference Siskind, Orr, Sinha, Yu, Brijball and Warren2 TRS is defined as an inadequate response to treatment of adequate dose, duration and concordance with two different antipsychotics. Reference Taylor, Barnes and Young3,4 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) guidelines advise that clozapine be considered after 2 antipsychotics (1 an atypical) have been tried for 6–8 weeks and an inadequate effect has been demonstrated. 4

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic treatment that is specifically licensed in the UK for use in TRS, and it is associated with better outcomes compared with other antipsychotics in this patient population. Reference Taylor, Barnes and Young3–Reference Siskind, McCartney, Goldschlager and Kisely6 Despite guidelines advising treatment with clozapine at the earliest opportunity in TRS, there can be significant delays to its initiation in clinical practice, Reference McCutcheon, Pillinger, Varvari, Halstead, Olayinka and Crossley7–Reference Thien and O’Donoghue9 and this is associated with worse outcomes. Reference Shah, Iwata, Plitman, Brown, Caravaggio and Kim10,Reference Hatano, Kamei, Takeuchi, Gomi, Sakakibara and Hotta11

Delays in clozapine initiation can result, in part, from the fact that initiation is often available only in an in-patient setting. This is typically an unattractive option for patients and incurs significant financial cost. Reference Butler, Pillinger, Brown, Borgan, Bowen and Beck12,Reference Gee, Shergill and Taylor13 In the UK there had been a historical requirement under the product licence for clozapine to be started in hospital; although this was revoked in 2002, the majority of clozapine initiations have continued to take place in in-patient settings. Reference O’Brien14 Community titrations of clozapine have previously been shown to be a safe and feasible approach, and are associated with significant reductions in cost, service use and symptom severity. Reference Butler, Pillinger, Brown, Borgan, Bowen and Beck12 The impact of a specialist community initiation service on clozapine initiation rates in the community, however, is yet to be investigated.

This study aimed to investigate whether a community clozapine titration service is associated with an increase in the rate of community clozapine titrations. It was hypothesised that there would be an increase in community clozapine titrations over the period during which this service was available, compared with periods when it was not available. Comparison of key clinical outcomes at baseline and discharge, in patients titrated through this service, were analysed as secondary objectives.

Method

A retrospective analysis of clozapine titration locations over 40 months (September 2021–January 2025) was conducted. This period comprised 2 years as a baseline prior to the service’s commencement, the 1 year when this service was operational, followed by the 4-month period immediately after its cessation. During 12 of these months (period 3) the specialist community service, the Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) clinic, was in operation.

Objectives

The primary objective was to compare the rates of community clozapine titration in the year in which the TUNE-UP service was running with the 2 years beforehand, and the 4-month period afterwards. A sensitivity analysis was also performed excluding the post-TUNE-UP period. Secondary objectives included further analyses of combined (i.e. community and in-patient) titration rates and of first-time and re-titrations analysed separately. An exploratory analysis of clozapine initiation on clinical measures in TUNE-UP patients was also performed, and data regarding the length of stay for in-patient clozapine initiations were obtained.

Service description

The TUNE-UP clinic launched in September 2023 as a satellite service to four Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (UK) community psychiatry teams (three adult mental health teams (AMHTs) and one early intervention service). These teams serve a population of approximately 165 000 people and have a combined caseload of 1455 patients.

The TUNE-UP team consisted of one full-time medical doctor, with additional support provided by clinical academics and the Physical Health in Severe Mental Illness team.

Patients were referred by these teams to TUNE-UP for assessment and management advice for significant positive, negative and cognitive symptoms or physical health concerns. A comprehensive assessment was performed (see Box 1), and a management plan developed in collaboration with the patient. Following approval by the referrer, the TUNE-UP service then implemented the proposed plan, including, but not limited to, community initiation of clozapine (see Box 2, based on existing community clozapine initiation approaches). Reference Beck, McCutcheon, Bloomfield, Gaughran, Reis Marques and MacCabe15,Reference Oloyede, Dzahini, Abolou, Gee, Whiskey and Malhotra16 Following clozapine initiation, and once clinical stability was achieved, patients were discharged from TUNE-UP back to the sole care of their team.

Box 1 The Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) clinic service model

From referral, within 3 weeks:

  1. (a) Review patient electronic notes and obtain collateral information.

  2. (b) Explore and help patients articulate and formulate their goals.

Conduct a comprehensive assessment including standardised rating scales.

  1. (i) Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; Reference Kay, Fiszbein and Opler17

  2. (ii) Brief Negative Syndrome Scale; Reference Kirkpatrick, Strauss, Nguyen, Fischer, Daniel and Cienfuegos18

  3. (iii) Calgary Depression Scale; Reference Addington, Addington and Schissel19

  4. (iv) Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry; Reference Schmid, Czekaj, Frick, Steinert, Purdon and Uhlmann20

  5. (v) Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia; Reference Stip, Caron, Renaud, Pampoulova and Lecomte21

  6. (vi) Sheehan Disability Scale; Reference Sheehan and Sheehan22

  7. (vii) Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale; Reference Morosini, Magliano, Brambilla, Ugolini and Pioli23

  8. (viii) Sleep Condition Indicator. Reference Espie, Kyle, Hames, Gardani, Fleming and Cape24

  1. (c) Investigate physical health via physical examination and clinical investigations, including electrocardiogram and blood tests (prolactin, full blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, thyroid function tests, liver function tests, urea and electrolytes, bone profile, lipids profile, HbA1c, c-reactive protein, troponin-I (for clozapine titrations) and, if indicated, psychotropic levels).

From investigation stage to management formulation stage, 1 week:

  1. (a) Identify treatment options for a range of symptom domains: positive symptoms, negative symptoms, affective symptoms, sleep, cardiometabolic health.

  2. (b) Develop treatment strategies via a Co-Care Approach Model (involving adult mental health teams (AMHTs), general practitioners (GPs) and carers) aligned with patient goals, such as side-effect informed treatment optimisation, Reference Pillinger, Howes, Correll, Leucht, Huhn and Schneider-Thoma25 side-effects management and adjunctive therapies including psychosocial interventions.

Implementation (3–6 months)

  1. (a) Implement and monitor changes.

  2. Longitudinal assessment with repetition of clinical scales at discharge.

  3. (b) Discharge to AMHT or GP with short- and long-term recommendations that align with patient goals.

Box 2 Community clozapine initiation procedures

After a patient meets the treatment resistance criteria, the following steps are conducted:

  1. (a) community initiation eligibility screen as per Maudsley Guidelines; Reference Taylor, Barnes and Young3

  2. (b) baseline investigations: electrocardiogram, full blood count (FBC), troponin-I, c-reactive protein (CRP), liver function tests, urea and electrolytes, glucose, lipids, HbA1c.

Considering patient preference, a tailored titration plan weighing mental state, current psychotropics and prior trials/responses to clozapine is designed. A standard plan is:

  1. (a) Week 1: start at 6.25 mg and double dose every other day reaching 50 mg at the end of week 1.

  2. (b) Weeks 2–5: increase dose by 25 mg/day.

  3. (c) Week 5: consultant-guided increments of 25–50 mg/day until a stable dose is reached, aiming for therapeutic plasma levels (0.35–0.50 mg/L).

This titration rate follows other community titration protocols. Slower titration allows for detection of adverse effects earlier, improves tolerability and may reduce the risk of certain adverse effects that are titration rate-dependent. Reference Taylor, Barnes and Young3,Reference Beck, McCutcheon, Bloomfield, Gaughran, Reis Marques and MacCabe15

Monitoring includes:

  1. (a) Physical health checks include pulse, postural blood pressure, temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturations.

    1. (i) weeks 1 and 2, 3 times per week;

    2. (ii) weeks 3 and 4, 2 times per week;

    3. (iii) weeks 5 and 6, 1 time per week.

  2. (b) Haematological monitoring:

    1. (i) troponin-I and CRP weekly for 6 weeks;

    2. (ii) FBC weekly until week 18, fortnightly until week 52 then monthly onwards.

  3. (c) Side-effects checklist at the same time as physical health checks, including sedation, hypersalivation, constipation and any signs of immunosuppression or cardiac strain.

Data collection

This project was approved by the Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust Audit Management and Tracking service, with further ethical approval not required. All data on clozapine initiations that had occurred within the four teams during the study period were obtained from the Denzapine Monitoring System, because the Trust solely initiates clozapine under the brand name Denzapine. For each patient initiated on clozapine, a review of electronic health records was performed to ascertain the location of clozapine initiation. Additional information gathered included demographics, central non-re-challenge database check date, date of initiation and primary diagnosis. Patients with no prior exposure to clozapine were classified as first-time titrations; those who had been titrated previously were classified as re-titrations. For patients seen by TUNE-UP, a range of clinical measures were also obtained at baseline and, where possible, at discharge (listed in Box 2).

In order to quantify the duration of in-patient clozapine titrations, a prior service evaluation reviewed clinical notes for all patients initiating clozapine within Warneford Hospital (Oxford, UK) between July 2018 and December 2020. The average cost of in-patient bed-day was provided by the Trust.

Statistical analysis

Counts of initiations were analysed using generalised linear models, with a log-link for observed exposure time to estimate initiation rates (implemented using the statsmodels package 0.14.4 in Python 3.12.8 on macOS). Reference Seabold and Perktold26 The primary analysis compared community initiations in the TUNE-UP year (period 3) with those in the other periods. For each outcome a Poisson regression was fitted, with the log of the period length as an offset. Over-dispersion was assessed using Pearson χ 2/degrees of freedom (with threshold set at 1.5; if greater than this, the negative binomial model was used). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals and P-values are reported. A sensitivity analysis was also performed in which the post TUNE-UP period was excluded.

Secondary analyses involved three outcome groups with two or three analyses per group, and these were adjusted for multiple comparisons across the eight secondary tests using Benjamini–Hochberg (false discovery rate (FDR)) correction:

  1. (a) Group 1: overall, i.e. first-time titrations and re-titrations, analysed together;

    1. (i) combined (i.e. community and in-patients);

    2. (ii) in-patients only.

  2. (b) Group 2: first-time titrations analysed separately;

    • (i) community titrations only;

    • (ii) combined;

    • (iii) in-patients only.

  3. (c) Group 3: re-titrations analysed separately;

    1. (i) community titrations only;

    2. (ii) combined;

    3. (iii) in-patients only.

An exploratory analysis was conducted for the clinical outcomes data, where paired changes were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (two-sided). Baseline and discharge medians are reported, along with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals and two-sided P-values.

Statistical code and output tables are provided in the supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.10988.

Results

Fifty-four patients included in the four AMHTs of interest were recorded on the Denzapine Monitoring System as having potentially commenced clozapine treatment between September 2021 and January 2025. Three of these cases were registered but not actually titrated (due to these patients having relocated to the area). Of the remaining 51 cases, 29 were identified as first-time titrations and 22 as re-titrations. Demographic details for all patients receiving clozapine initiation are reported in Table 1, and referral reasons for TUNE-UP patients are reported in Table 2 (Fig. 1). The raw monthly breakdown of titration location is available in Supplementary Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic details of patients initiated on clozapine

Table 2 Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) referrals: demographics and referral reasons

Fig. 1 Flowchart of Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) clinic initiations.

Ten patients were initiated by TUNE-UP, seven of whom were titrated onto a regular dose. Three patients had their titration discontinued – one of these was due to a recurrence of clozapine-related myocarditis, and in two patients non-adherence rendered the risk of continuing with titration as being greater than the potential benefits from ongoing treatment.

Of the ten patients titrated on clozapine by TUNE-UP, six had symptoms scored at discharge. In exploratory analyses there was a statistically significant improvement observed for scores in total PANSS and the Subjective Scale to Investigate Cognition in Schizophrenia (see Supplementary Table 2).

Primary outcome

In the primary analysis there were significantly greater numbers of community clozapine initiations during the TUNE-UP period (11.0 per year) compared with the period when the service was not available (1.71 per year) (IRR = 6.42, 95% CI 2.04–20.2, P = 0.0015; see Fig. 2). In the sensitivity analysis, the increase in community clozapine initiations during the TUNE-UP period remained statistically significant when not including the post-TUNE-UP period (IRR = 5.5, 95% CI 1.75–17.3, P = 0.0035).

Fig. 2 Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) period is associated with significant increase in community clozapine initiations.

*Statistically significant increase in community clozapine initiation during the TUNE-UP period P = 0.0015.

Secondary outcomes

Within the secondary analyses (eight tests across three outcome groups), two further comparisons remained significant following FDR correction. There were significantly greater numbers of combined first-time titrations during the TUNE-UP period (15.0 per year) compared with the period when the service was unavailable (6.0 per year) (IRR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.21–5.18, FDR q = 0.041). There were also significantly greater numbers of community first-time titrations in the TUNE-UP period (8.0 per year) compared with when the service was unavailable (0.87 per year) when analysed separately (IRR = 9.33, 95% CI 1.98–44.0, FDR q = 0.021). There was a greater number of overall clozapine titrations (IRR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.02–3.08, P = 0.04, FDR q = 0.1), although this did not survive FDR correction. Complete model outputs are reported in Supplementary Table 3.

The service evaluation of in-patient clozapine duration identified 13 initiations, and these had a mean duration of 146 days (range 21–250 days). As of November 2025, the average cost for an acute in-patient bed stood at £764.31 per day.

Discussion

Our findings show that a targeted out-patient service for community clozapine initiation is associated with a significant increase in community initiation rates. This increased rate of initiation was found primarily in patients who had not previously been titrated on clozapine (i.e. first-time titrations). There was no significant change in the rate of in-patient clozapine initiations in the period during which the service was running. Although previous work has demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of community clozapine services, Reference Butler, Pillinger, Brown, Borgan, Bowen and Beck12 to our knowledge this is the first demonstration that specialist community initiation clinics are associated with an increase in the frequency of community initiation.

The impact of the service was primarily associated with increasing community rates, rather than reducing in-patient admission rates. Many in-patients that are initiated are significantly unwell and require admission and, as such, this cohort would not be suitable for community initiation. When the service was unavailable, it appeared that most patients were offered clozapine initiation during periods of acute deterioration and in-patient admission. Therefore, the patients most likely to benefit from services such as TUNE-UP may be those with symptoms that impair functioning and who do not require in-patient admission. With restrictions of resources contributing to a lack of in-patient beds, and limited capacity of out-patient teams to initiate clozapine, it is likely that this cohort would continue to be suboptimally treated in the community and either continue in this way or deteriorate significantly as to require admission. First-time titrations were at their highest in the year during which this service was running, indicating that clinicians were able to trial clozapine in a greater number of TRS patients. An out-patient clozapine titration service may give clinicians the ability to offer clozapine to lower-risk TRS patients who would not otherwise receive this treatment, unless they deteriorated to the point of needing in-patient admission.

A high proportion of patients discontinue treatment with clozapine, with one of the factors previously shown to contribute to this being patients’ feelings of a lack of agency regarding decisions related to their treatment and health. Reference Southern, Elliott and Maidment27 Shared decision-making and person-centred care lead to improved adherence and outcomes. Reference Southern, Elliott and Maidment27,Reference Zisman-Ilani, Roth and Mistler28 Community titration could allow patients greater autonomy, which may have positive effects on overall outcomes. Further qualitative research may be helpful in exploring patients’ attitudes and feedback regarding such a service.

Given the persistent underutilisation of clozapine, national efforts to increase patient and clinician awareness may be indicated to boost the appropriate prescription of this medication. Clearer pharmacological records of previous antipsychotics trialled, including dose, duration and monitoring of adherence (e.g. using measurement of antipsychotic levels), may help clinicians identify TRS as soon as criteria are fulfilled. Reference McCutcheon, Beck, D’Ambrosio, Donocik, Gobjila and Jauhar29 Replicating the findings of this study in other trusts would contribute to their robustness.

Clinical guidelines advise offering clozapine to TRS patients at the earliest opportunity: a longer delay negatively impacts prognosis. Reference Taylor, Barnes and Young3,4 The cost-effectiveness of clozapine treatment in TRS has been shown repeatedly, as have the benefits regarding life expectancy and suicidality. Reference Tiihonen, Lönnqvist, Wahlbeck, Klaukka, Niskanen and Tanskanen30,Reference Lee, Cotes, Mojtabai, Margolis, Nucifora and Nestadt31 Despite this, clozapine is underutilised and delays in initiation average up to 5 years in the UK. Reference John, Ko and Dominic8,Reference Thien and O’Donoghue9,Reference Howes, Vergunst, Gee, McGuire, Kapur and Taylor32,Reference Bogers, Schulte, Van Dijk, Bakker and Cohen33 There are significant differences in the rates of clozapine prescribing among different trusts, with one study from 2007 showing a persistent 5-fold difference in rates of clozapine prescription between 45 National Health Service (NHS) trusts. Reference Downs and Zinkler34 A more recent study in 2021 indicated that clozapine is grossly underutilised in the UK, with only a third of eligible patients receiving this treatment and a threefold variation in clozapine prescription in England. Reference Whiskey, Barnard, Oloyede, Dzahini, Taylor and Shergill35 A previous study has shown a point prevalence of 56% of all patients under a general community mental health service meeting criteria for TRS, indicating a high rate of resistance in the community setting; half of these patients had never been trialled on clozapine. Reference Beck, McCutcheon, Stephenson, Schilderman, Patel and Ramsay36 This reflects similar findings both in Europe and internationally. Reference Bachmann, Aagaard, Bernardo, Brandt, Cartabia and Clavenna37,Reference Nielsen, Røge, Schjerning, Sørensen and Taylor38

The underutilisation of clozapine results from a wide range of factors. Clinicians struggle to identify patients with TRS, and limitations of resources, and clinicians’ and patients’ attitudes towards clozapine, also play a significant role. Reference Gee, Shergill and Taylor13,Reference Gee, Vergunst, Howes and Taylor39 Other barriers to timely treatment include practitioners’ anxiety regarding medical complications related to clozapine, their concerns regarding concordance, comorbid medical conditions and the logistics of initiation; and also patients’ concerns regarding tolerability and difficulty in adhering to blood test monitoring. Patients describe the necessity for hospital admission as the greatest barrier to agreeing to treatment with clozapine. Reference Gee, Shergill and Taylor13 Dedicated out-patient services focused on clozapine initiation may address some these barriers, and this has been identified by practitioners as a factor that would increase prescribing. Reference Gee, Vergunst, Howes and Taylor39

There are also potential cost benefits. In the NHS trust of this study, the average cost per bed-day in an acute adult mental health ward in Oxfordshire was found to be £764.31, and in-patient admissions for clozapine titration typically last around 146 days. Based on this, the cost of the 10 additional titrations delivered by TUNE-UP would possibly have exceeded £1 000 000 if conducted in an in-patient setting. This figure, however, probably includes admissions due to symptomatic exacerbation rather than solely for the purpose of initiation. In a setting outside of Oxford Health, the cost of a 4-week, in-patient clozapine initiation has been estimated at £11 697, which would equate to £116 970 for 10 patients. Reference Butler, Pillinger, Brown, Borgan, Bowen and Beck12 It is important to note that these figures do not account for the potential longer-term savings associated with clozapine use, primarily due to reductions in future hospital admissions. Reference Land, Siskind, McArdle, Kisely, Winckel and Hollingworth40 A previous cost-effectiveness study of a similar service demonstrated the cost benefits of the approach. Reference Butler, Pillinger, Brown, Borgan, Bowen and Beck12 These data highlight the need for innovative, community-based approaches to increase clozapine initiation in a cost-effective manner.

Strengths and limitations

The methodological strengths of this study include the ability to identify a comprehensive cohort of individuals commencing clozapine for the first time during the study period, and the ability to accurately identify their titration location from electronic records with minimal confounders of these data. The risk of selection bias of patients in this retrospective study was limited by using a centralised registry to identify all cases of clozapine initiation. In addition, the fact that the service was piloted for 12 months, and data were gathered following the termination of the pilot, provide a natural experiment which demonstrates that the findings are not reflective of more general long-term trends unrelated to the service.

Limitations of this study include the moderate total number of patients, the small cohort initiated by the TUNE-UP service and the lack of randomisation; furthermore, the observational nature is unable to ascribe causality to the effect of the intervention. A further possible limitation of this study is data incompleteness: in the case of re-titrations it is possible that, in cases where only a short break had occurred, the re-titration may not have been recorded on the Denzapine Monitoring Service database and would therefore have been missed in the analysis. This would not, however, affect the analysis of first-time titrations. The robustness of the clinical change measures is limited by the fact that they were obtained by unblinded clinicians and in only a small number of patients, and also by the potential for attrition bias. It is also possible that there may have been coincidental changes locally or nationally that could have influenced rates of community initiation and that might account for the observed results. This is unlikely, however, given the extremely low levels of clozapine prescribing seen both prior to the service being in operation and then subsequent to the service ceasing to offer clozapine initiation.

Potential weaknesses of the service model design include the need for patients to travel to the out-patient clinic for monitoring and clinical review, and the fragmentation of care between the parent team and TUNE-UP clinic. Strengths include intensive and focused clinical input for an often-neglected clinical population, whereby certain interventions may have a greater impact on health and functioning.

The findings of this study demonstrate that a targeted service that can titrate patients on clozapine in the community is associated with a significant increase in community clozapine initiation rates. When analysed separately, there was a significant increase in the rate of community and combined first-time titrations during the period during which this service was running. Patients titrated on clozapine through the service had improved symptom burden and functioning, although the sample size was small. There is now evidence showing that services for the community initiation of clozapine are associated with increased rates of community clozapine initiation, and these may provide clinical benefit to patient groups that are otherwise being treated suboptimally in the community.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.10988

Data availability

The data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Acknowledgement

This work and the TUNE-UP clinic have been developed as part of a collaborative working partnership between Oxford Health NHS Trust and Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd.

Author contributions

R.A.M., Z.A.K. and I.V. conceived the study. Z.A.K. extracted the data and performed the analysis. Z.A.K. and I.V. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, with R.A.M.’s supervision. Z.A.K., I.V., V.M., C.Z.-Z., S.K., J.B.F., S.M., A.P., B.P., S.J.G.N.d.L.M.d.B.d.V., D.Q., D.M., J.B.-B., P.M., O.D.H., T.P. and R.A.M. reviewed the manuscript and provided input on the final draft.

Funding

R.A.M.’s work is funded by a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship (224625/Z/21/Z) and is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre. I.V.’s research is supported by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (grant NIHR203316). V.M. is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (no. P500PM_217669). T.P. is supported by NIHR, Maudsley Charity, the Brain and Behaviour Research Foundation, the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the UK Research and InnovationI Hub for Metabolic Psychiatry (grant reference no. MR/Z503563/1, platform grant code MR/Z000548/1). J.B.F. is supported by an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship (no. ACF-2023-13-016). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Declaration of interest

R.A.M. has received speaker/consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Karuna, Lundbeck, Newron, Otsuka and Viatris, and co-directs a company that designs digital resources to support treatment of mental ill health. T.P. has received speaker/consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Recordati, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Janssen, CNX Therapeutics, Sunovion, ROVI Biotech, Schwabe Pharma and Lecturing Minds Stockholm AB; he receives book royalties from Wiley Blackwell and co-directs a company that designs digital resources to support thetreatment of mental illness. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally.

References

McCutcheon, RA, Keefe, RSE, McGuire, PK. Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: aetiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Mol Psychiatry 2023; 28: 1902–18.10.1038/s41380-023-01949-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siskind, D, Orr, S, Sinha, S, Yu, O, Brijball, B, Warren, N, et al. Rates of treatment-resistant schizophrenia from first-episode cohorts: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 220: 115–20.10.1192/bjp.2021.61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, DM, Barnes, TRE, Young, AH. The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines in Psychiatry. John Wiley & Sons, 2021.10.1002/9781119870203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and Schizophrenia in Adults: Prevention and Management. NICE, 2014.Google Scholar
Wagner, E, Siafis, S, Fernando, P, Falkai, P, Honer, WG, Röh, A, et al. Efficacy and safety of clozapine in psychotic disorders – a systematic quantitative meta-review. Transl Psychiatry 2021; 11: 487.10.1038/s41398-021-01613-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siskind, D, McCartney, L, Goldschlager, R, Kisely, S. Clozapine v. first- and second-generation antipsychotics in treatment-refractory schizophrenia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2016; 209: 385–92.10.1192/bjp.bp.115.177261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCutcheon, R, Pillinger, T, Varvari, I, Halstead, S, Olayinka, O, Crossley, N, et al. INTEGRATE: international guidelines for the algorithmic treatment of schizophrenia. Lancet Psychiatry 2025; 12: 384–94.10.1016/S2215-0366(25)00031-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
John, AP, Ko, EKF, Dominic, A. Delayed initiation of clozapine continues to be a substantial clinical concern. Can J Psychiatry 2018; 63: 526–31.10.1177/0706743718772522CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thien, K, O’Donoghue, B. Delays and barriers to the commencement of clozapine in eligible people with a psychotic disorder: a literature review. Early Interv Psychiatry 2019; 13: 18–23.10.1111/eip.12683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, P, Iwata, Y, Plitman, E, Brown, EE, Caravaggio, F, Kim, J, et al. The impact of delay in clozapine initiation on treatment outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review. Psychiatry Res 2018; 268: 114–22.10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.070CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatano, M, Kamei, H, Takeuchi, I, Gomi, K, Sakakibara, T, Hotta, S, et al. Long-term outcomes of delayed clozapine initiation in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23: 673.10.1186/s12888-023-05176-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, E, Pillinger, T, Brown, K, Borgan, F, Bowen, A, Beck, K, et al. Real-world clinical and cost-effectiveness of community clozapine initiation: mirror cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 221: 740–7.10.1192/bjp.2022.47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gee, SH, Shergill, SS, Taylor, DM. Patient attitudes to clozapine initiation. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2017; 32: 337–42 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, A. Starting clozapine in the community. CNS Drugs 2004; 18: 845–52.10.2165/00023210-200418130-00002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, K, McCutcheon, R, Bloomfield, MAP, Gaughran, F, Reis Marques, T, MacCabe, J, et al. The practical management of refractory schizophrenia--the Maudsley Treatment REview and Assessment Team service approach. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014; 130: 427–38.10.1111/acps.12327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oloyede, E, Dzahini, O, Abolou, Z, Gee, S, Whiskey, E, Malhotra, D, et al. Clinical impact of reducing the frequency of clozapine monitoring: controlled mirror-image cohort study. Br J Psychiatry 2023; 223: 382–8.10.1192/bjp.2023.44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, SR, Fiszbein, A, Opler, LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987; 13: 261–76.10.1093/schbul/13.2.261CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, B, Strauss, GP, Nguyen, L, Fischer, BA, Daniel, DG, Cienfuegos, A, et al. The brief negative symptom scale: psychometric properties. Schizophr Bull 2011; 37: 300–5.10.1093/schbul/sbq059CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Addington, D, Addington, J, Schissel, B. A depression rating scale for schizophrenics. Schizophr Res 1990; 3: 247–51.10.1016/0920-9964(90)90005-RCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, P, Czekaj, A, Frick, J, Steinert, T, Purdon, SE, Uhlmann, C. The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry (SCIP) as a routinely applied screening tool: pathology of acute psychiatric inpatients and cluster analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21: 494.10.1186/s12888-021-03508-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stip, E, Caron, J, Renaud, S, Pampoulova, T, Lecomte, Y. Exploring cognitive complaints in schizophrenia: the subjective scale to investigate cognition in schizophrenia. Compr Psychiatry 2003; 44: 331–40.10.1016/S0010-440X(03)00086-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, KH, Sheehan, DV. Assessing treatment effects in clinical trials with the Discan metric of the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2008; 23: 70–83.10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f2b4d6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morosini, PL, Magliano, L, Brambilla, L, Ugolini, S, Pioli, R. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social funtioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000; 101: 323–9.Google Scholar
Espie, CA, Kyle, SD, Hames, P, Gardani, M, Fleming, L, Cape, J. The Sleep Condition Indicator: a clinical screening tool to evaluate insomnia disorder. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004183.10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillinger, T, Howes, OD, Correll, CU, Leucht, S, Huhn, M, Schneider-Thoma, J, et al. Antidepressant and antipsychotic side-effects and personalised prescribing: a systematic review and digital tool development. Lancet Psychiatry 2023; 10: 860–76.10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00262-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seabold, S, Perktold, J. Statsmodels: Econometric and statistical modeling with Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (Austin, Texas, USA, 28 Jun). SciPy, 2010.Google Scholar
Southern, J, Elliott, P, Maidment, I. What are patients’ experiences of discontinuing clozapine and how does this impact their views on subsequent treatment? BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23: 353.10.1186/s12888-023-04851-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zisman-Ilani, Y, Roth, RM, Mistler, LA. Time to support extensive implementation of shared decision making in psychiatry. JAMA Psychiatry 2021; 78: 1183–4.10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCutcheon, R, Beck, K, D’Ambrosio, E, Donocik, J, Gobjila, C, Jauhar, S, et al. Antipsychotic plasma levels in the assessment of poor treatment response in schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2018; 137: 39–46.10.1111/acps.12825CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiihonen, J, Lönnqvist, J, Wahlbeck, K, Klaukka, T, Niskanen, L, Tanskanen, A, et al. 11-year follow-up of mortality in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study (FIN11 study). Lancet 2009; 374: 620–7.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60742-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, BJ, Cotes, RO, Mojtabai, R, Margolis, RL, Nucifora, FC, Nestadt, PS. The protective effect of clozapine on suicide. J Clin Psychiatry 2023; 84: 22m14587.10.4088/JCP.22m14587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, OD, Vergunst, F, Gee, S, McGuire, P, Kapur, S, Taylor, D. Adherence to treatment guidelines in clinical practice: study of antipsychotic treatment prior to clozapine initiation. Br J Psychiatry 2012; 201: 481–5.10.1192/bjp.bp.111.105833CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogers, JPAM, Schulte, PFJ, Van Dijk, D, Bakker, B, Cohen, D. Clozapine underutilization in the treatment of schizophrenia: how can clozapine prescription rates be improved? J Clin Psychopharmacol 2016; 36: 109–11.10.1097/JCP.0000000000000478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Downs, J, Zinkler, M. Clozapine: national review of postcode prescribing. Psychiatr Bull 2007; 31: 384–7.10.1192/pb.bp.106.013144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiskey, E, Barnard, A, Oloyede, E, Dzahini, O, Taylor, DM, Shergill, SS. An evaluation of the variation and underuse of clozapine in the United Kingdom. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2021; 143: 339–47.10.1111/acps.13280CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, K, McCutcheon, R, Stephenson, L, Schilderman, M, Patel, N, Ramsay, R, et al. Prevalence of treatment-resistant psychoses in the community: a naturalistic study. J Psychopharmacol 2019; 33: 1248–53.10.1177/0269881119855995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachmann, CJ, Aagaard, L, Bernardo, M, Brandt, L, Cartabia, M, Clavenna, A, et al. International trends in clozapine use: a study in 17 countries. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 136: 37–51.10.1111/acps.12742CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, J, Røge, R, Schjerning, O, Sørensen, HJ, Taylor, D. Geographical and temporal variations in clozapine prescription for schizophrenia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2012; 22: 818–24.10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.03.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gee, S, Vergunst, F, Howes, O, Taylor, D. Practitioner attitudes to clozapine initiation. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014; 130: 16–24.10.1111/acps.12193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Land, R, Siskind, D, McArdle, P, Kisely, S, Winckel, K, Hollingworth, SA. The impact of clozapine on hospital use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 135: 296–309.10.1111/acps.12700CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Demographic details of patients initiated on clozapine

Figure 1

Table 2 Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) referrals: demographics and referral reasons

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Flowchart of Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) clinic initiations.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Treating Unmet Needs in Psychiatry (TUNE-UP) period is associated with significant increase in community clozapine initiations.*Statistically significant increase in community clozapine initiation during the TUNE-UP period P = 0.0015.

Supplementary material: File

Ahmad Khan et al. supplementary material

Ahmad Khan et al. supplementary material
Download Ahmad Khan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.1 KB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.