Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T20:10:47.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Beyond the Pale”: Tainted Whiteness, Cognitive Disability, and Eugenic Sterilization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Anna Stubblefield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of the eugenics movement in the United States during the first half of the twentieth century was to prevent the degeneration of the white race. A central tactic of the movement was the involuntary sterilization of people labeled as feebleminded. An analysis of the practice of eugenic sterilization provides insight into how the concepts of gender, race, class, and dislability are fundamentally intertwined. I argue that in the early twentieth century, the concept of feeblemindedness came to operate as an umbrella concept that linked off-white ethnicity, poverty, and gendered conceptions of lack of moral character together and that feeblemindedness thus understood functioned as the signifier of tainted whiteness.

Information

Type
Miscegenation and Purity
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 2: Special Issue: The Reproduction of Whiteness: Race and the Regulation of the Gendered Body , Spring 2007 , pp. 162 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carlson, Licia. 2001. Cognitive ableism and disability studies: Feminist reflections on the history of mental retardation. Hypatia 16 (4): 124–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Licia. 2003. Rethinking normalcy. In Science and other cultures. ed. Figueroa, Robert and Harding, Sandra. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Down, J. Langdon. 1990. On some of the mental affections of childhood and youth. London: Mac Keith Press.Google Scholar
Gabel, Susan L. 2005. Disability studies in education. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Goddard, Henry Herbert. 1914. Feeble‐mindedness: Its causes and consequences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goddard, Henry Herbert. 1919. Psychology of the normal and subnormal. New York: Dodd, Mead, and Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1981. The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Graves, Joseph L. Jr. 2001. The emperor's new clothes: Biological theories of race at the millennium. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hahn, Nicolas F. [Nicole Hahn Rafter]. 1980. Too dumb to know better: Cacogenic family studies and the criminology of women. Criminology 18 (1): 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Matthew Frye. 2000. Barbarian virtues: The United States encounters foreign peoples at home and abroad, 1876‐‐1917. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. 1782. Notes on the state of Virginia, http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/jevifram.htm (accessed June 13, 2006).Google Scholar
Kliewer, Christopher, and Fitzgerald, Linda May. 2001. Disability, schooling, and the artifacts of colonialism. Teachers College Record 10 (3): 450–70.Google Scholar
Kline, Wendy. 2001. Building a better race: Gender, sexuality, and eugenics from the turn of the century to the baby boom. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Edward J. 1995. Sex, race, and science: Eugenics in the Deep South. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nott, Josiah Clark, and Glidden, George R. 1857. Types of mankind. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Ordover, Nancy. 2003. American eugenics: Race, queer anatomy, and the science of nationalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rafter, Nicole Hahn. 1988. White trash: The eugenic family studies, 1877‐‐1919. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Rapley, Mark. 2004. The social construction of intellectual disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy. 1997. Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sarason, Seymour, and Doris, John. 1979. Educational handicap, public policy, and social history: A broadened perspective on mental retardation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. David. 1985. Minds made feeble: The myth and legacy of the Kallikaks. Rockville, Md.: Aspen Systems Corporation.Google Scholar
Terman, Lewis M. 1916/1975. The measurement of intelligence. New York: Amo Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar