Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T13:28:16.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The heritability of Nematodirus battus fecal egg counts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2022

Saeid Nikbin
Affiliation:
Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
Fazel Almasi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
Dalal Alenizi
Affiliation:
Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
Caitlin Jenvey
Affiliation:
Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
Sarah Sloan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
Sarah Preston
Affiliation:
School of Science, Psychology and Sport, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia
David Piedrafita
Affiliation:
School of Science, Psychology and Sport, Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Victoria 3353, Australia
Nicholas Jonsson
Affiliation:
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Garscube Campus, Bearsden Road, Glasgow, Scotland G61 1QH, UK
Michael Stear*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Science, Agribio, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Michael Stear, E-mail: m.stear@latrobe.edu.au

Abstract

Although Nematodirus battus is a serious threat to the health and survival of young lambs, there are few options to control this parasite. Bayesian Monte Carlo Markov Chain modelling with a zero-inflated Poisson distribution was used to estimate the heritability of egg counts in both June and July for each of five consecutive cohorts of 200 Scottish Blackface lambs. In one of the 10 analyses, the results failed the diagnostic tests. In seven of the analyses, there was no convincing evidence that the variation in egg counts was heritable. In the 2 years of high infection, the heritability was approximately 0.4 in June but the estimates lacked precision and the 95% highest posterior density credible intervals ranged from just above zero to 0.7. Selective breeding for resistance to N. battus will be difficult because genetically resistant or susceptible lambs cannot be consistently identified by phenotypic markers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The distribution of Nematodirus battus egg counts in June 1992.

Figure 1

Table 1. Number of lambs, time of sampling, zero-inflation relative to the Poisson distribution, fecal egg count (eggs per gram) for Nematodirus battus

Figure 2

Fig. 2. The distribution of posterior heritability estimates for the July 1994 samples. There was no indication in this cohort that egg counts were significantly different from zero.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. The distribution of posterior heritability estimates for the June 1995 samples. The unimodal and nearly symmetric distribution suggests that the true heritability is significantly different from zero.

Figure 4

Table 2. Time of sampling, estimated heritability of Nematodirus battus egg counts, 95% highest posterior density credible intervals (HPD) for one analysis and Monte Carlo variation (standard error of the mean of 10 replicated analyses)

Supplementary material: Image

Nikbin et al. supplementary material

Nikbin et al. supplementary material 1

Download Nikbin et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 122.8 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Nikbin et al. supplementary material

Nikbin et al. supplementary material 2

Download Nikbin et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 3.1 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Nikbin et al. supplementary material

Nikbin et al. supplementary material 3

Download Nikbin et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 3.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Nikbin et al. supplementary material

Nikbin et al. supplementary material 4

Download Nikbin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 4.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nikbin et al. supplementary material

Nikbin et al. supplementary material 5

Download Nikbin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.1 KB