Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-h52fh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T12:03:45.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leveraging a Sturdy Norm: How Ethicists Really Argue – ERRATUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2024

David DeGrazia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , October 2024 , pp. 608
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original targeted article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

The publisher apologises that upon publication of this article a question mark was incorrectly added to the end of the title.

The correct title should be:

Leveraging a Sturdy Norm: How Ethicists Really Argue

The article has been updated.

References

DeGrazia, D. Leveraging a Sturdy Norm: How Ethicists Really Argue? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2023:1–11. doi:10.1017/S0963180123000592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar