Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T16:05:20.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduced glycaemic and insulinaemic responses following isomaltulose ingestion: implications for postprandial substrate use

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2009

Judith G. P. van Can*
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
T. Herman IJzerman
Affiliation:
Department of Human Movement Sciences, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Luc J. C. van Loon
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Human Movement Sciences, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Fred Brouns
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands Cargill R&D Centre, Vilvoorde, Belgium
Ellen E. Blaak
Affiliation:
Department of Human Biology, Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: Judith van Can, fax +31 43 3670976, email j.vancan@hb.unimaas.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of slow digestible sources of dietary carbohydrate in reducing the risk of developing obesity and related metabolic disorders is unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare the postprandial metabolic response to the ingestion of sucrose v. isomaltulose. We hypothesised that the reduced digestion and absorption rate of isomaltulose would result in lower glycaemic and insulinaemic responses when compared with the ingestion of sucrose, leading to greater postprandial fat oxidation rates. In a randomised, single-blind, cross-over study, ten overweight subjects ingested two different carbohydrate drinks (sucrose and isomaltulose, 75 g carbohydrate equivalents) following an overnight fast (08.40 hours) and with a standardised meal (12.30 hours, 25 % of total energy content was provided as either a sucrose or isomaltulose drink). Blood samples were taken before ingestion and every 30 min thereafter for a period of 3 h, substrate use was assessed by indirect calorimetry and breath samples were collected. Ingestion of carbohydrates with a mixed meal resulted in a lower peak glucose and insulin response and a lower change in area under the curve (ΔAUC) following isomaltulose when compared with sucrose. Together with the lower glucose and insulin responses, postprandial fat oxidation rates were higher (14 %) with isomaltulose when compared with sucrose when ingested with a mixed meal (P = 0·02). The attenuated rise in glucose and insulin concentrations following isomaltulose results in reduced inhibition of postprandial fat oxidation. The metabolic response to isomaltulose co-ingestion suggests that this may represent an effective nutritional strategy to counteract overweight-induced metabolic disturbances.

Information

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Plasma glucose (a), insulin (b) and NEFA (c) concentrations following sucrose (–●–) or isomaltulose (–○–) ingestion. Time-course of fat oxidation (d), carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation (e) and ghrelin (f) following sucrose or isomaltulose ingestion. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that following isomaltulose ingestion (P < 0·05).

Figure 1

Table 1 Overview over metabolic responses, expressed as change in area under the curve (ΔAUC), after ingestion of isomaltulose and sucrose