Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T02:36:16.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of improving eating habits and rosmarinic acid supplementation on rat vascular and neuronal system in the metabolic syndrome model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2020

D. Michalikova*
Affiliation:
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovak Republic
B. Tyukos Kaprinay
Affiliation:
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Z. Brnoliakova
Affiliation:
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
M. Sasvariova
Affiliation:
Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, 831 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
P. Krenek
Affiliation:
Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, 831 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
E. Babiak
Affiliation:
Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, 831 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
K. Frimmel
Affiliation:
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute for Heart Research, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
S. Bittner Fialova
Affiliation:
Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, 831 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
T. Stankovicova
Affiliation:
Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University in Bratislava, 831 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
R. Sotnikova
Affiliation:
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
Z. Gasparova
Affiliation:
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Institute of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, 841 04 Bratislava, Slovak Republic
*
*Corresponding author: D. Michalikova, fax +421 914242167, email dominika.michalikova@savba.sk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Decreasing high fat and high carbohydrate intake, together with the administration of natural bioactive drugs, is assumed to have a protective effect in the prevention and amelioration of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). The aim of the study was to evaluate effects of diet improvement and/or a phenolic compound (rosmarinic acid; RA) administration (100 mg/kg per d) on metabolic as well as functional changes of vessels and hippocampus caused by the MetS-like conditions. The MetS-like conditions were induced by a high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) in Prague hereditary hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats. The effect of diet improvement and RA administration was studied using biochemical and functional measurements. Consumption of HFFD by HTG rats resulted in the development of conditions like the MetS. The fat and fructose restriction from the diet led to amelioration of basic indicators of metabolic state in rats fed HFFD and to amendment parameters of glucose tolerance test and reduction of the IL-1β serum levels. Moreover, aortic endothelial function was improved with an impact on blood pressure. The functional measurement of electrophysiology of the hippocampus showed that long-term potentiation of neuronal transmission course deteriorated after HFFD was improved by energy restriction. Oral administration of RA had a supporting effect not only on lipid and glucose metabolism but also on the vascular endothelium. Combination of both types of therapy induced beneficial effect on glucose tolerance and lipid peroxidation. Thus, combined improvement of diet habits and treatment with natural bioactive drugs is assumed to have protective effect in prevention and amelioration of the MetS.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on food intake. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are mean values and standard deviations. *** P < 0·001 against StD in the corresponding week, † P < 0·05 against HFFD8 in the corresponding week, †† P < 0·01 against HFFD8 in the corresponding week. , StD; , HFFD8; , HFFD5+3; , HFFD8+RA; , HFFD5+3+RA.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on changes in waist circumference. Data represent the change against values at the beginning of the experiment. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are mean values and standard deviations.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on changes in systolic blood pressure. Data represent the change against values at the beginning of the experiment. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are mean values and standard deviations. * P < 0·05 against the change after 5 weeks *** P < 0·001 against the same group before diet; ††† P < 0·001 against the same group after 5 weeks. , StD; , HFFD8; , HFFD5+3; , HFFD8+RA; , HFFD5+3+RA.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on glucose tolerance test. (a) Values expressed as course. (b) Data expressed as AUC. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are mean values and standard deviations. (a): * P < 0·05 StD against basal values (time 0); ** P < 0·01 HFFD8+RA against basal values (time 0); *** P < 0·001 HFFD8 against basal values (time 0). ††† P < 0·001 against all other groups at the same time. (b): *** P < 0·001 against HFFD8, ††† P < 0·001 against StD and HFFD8+RA, ‡‡‡ P < 0·001 against HFFD5+3. (a) , StD; , HFFD8; , HFFD5+3; , HFFD8+RA; , HFFD5+3+RA.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on levels of proinflammation marker IL-1β. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are mean values and standard deviations. ** P < 0·01 against StD, *** P < 0·001 against StD, † P < 0·05 against HFFD8.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on levels of lipid peroxidation marker expressed as thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) amount. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are mean values and standard deviations. *** P < 0·001 against the same group before diet, ** P < 0·01 against the same group before diet, † P < 0·05 against the same group after 5 weeks. , StD; , HFFD8; , HFFD5+3; , HFFD8+RA; , HFFD5+3+RA.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on endothelium-dependent relaxation of the aorta expressed as percentage of relaxation induced by acetylcholine after phenylephrine-induced contraction. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and for the last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are mean values and standard deviations. * P < 0·05 HFFD5+3 against HFFD5+3+RA group, † P < 0·05 – HFFD8 against HFFD8+RA group; ‡ P < 0·05 HFFD8 and HFFD8+RA against StD. , StD; , HFFD8; , HFFD5+3; , HFFD8+RA; , HFFD5+3+RA.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. The time-dependent effect of rosmarinic acid (RA) and/or energy restriction on long-term potentiation (LTP) of neuronal transmission recorded at the CA3-CA1 synapse in the stratum radiatum of the rat hippocampus. (a) Continuously recorded excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) amplitude values. High-frequency stimulation (HFS; 100 Hz, 1 s) was applied after 10 min of stabilisation. Recordings of neuronal transmission continued for the next 40 min. (b) LTP magnitudes calculated as means from the last 5 min of recordings. StD – HTG rats fed 8 weeks standard diet (StD); HFFD8 – hypertriacylglycerolaemic (HTG) rats fed high-fat-fructose diet (HFFD) 8 weeks; HFFD5+3 group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD; HFFD8+RA – HTG rats fed 8 weeks HFFD and last 3 weeks of this diet with RA; HFFD5+3+RA group – HTG rats fed 5 weeks HFFD and then 3 weeks StD with RA. n 10 rats/group. Data are expressed as mean values and standard deviations. *** P < 0·05 against HFFD5+3+RA, HFFD8+RA, HFFD8. (a) , StD; , HFFD8; , HFFD5+3; , HFFD8+RA; , HFFD5+3+RA.