Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T14:35:05.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of dietary methionine on productivity, reproductive performance, antioxidant capacity, ovalbumin and antioxidant-related gene expression in laying duck breeders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 December 2017

Dong Ruan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Ahmed M. Fouad
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt
Qiuli Fan
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Weiguang Xia
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Shuang Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Wei Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Chuxiao Lin
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Ying Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Lin Yang*
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
Chuntian Zheng*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science (South China) of Ministry of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, People’s Republic of China
*
* Corresponding authors: C. Zheng, fax +86 20 61368880, email zhengcht@163.com; L. Yang, email ylin898@126.com
* Corresponding authors: C. Zheng, fax +86 20 61368880, email zhengcht@163.com; L. Yang, email ylin898@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study investigated whether dietary methionine (Met) affects egg weight and antioxidant status through regulating gene expression of ovalbumin (OVAL), nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2) and haem oxygenase 1 (HO-1) in laying duck breeders. Longyan duck breeders (n 540, 19 weeks) were randomly assigned to six treatments with six replicates of fifteen birds each. Breeders were fed diets with six Met levels (2·00, 2·75, 3·50, 4·25, 5·00 and 5·75 g/kg) for 24 weeks. The egg weight (g), egg mass (g/d), feed conversion ratio, hatchability, 1-d duckling weight, albumen weight, albumen proportion and OVAL mRNA level improved with dietary Met levels, whereas yolk proportion decreased (P<0·05). The weight of total large yellow follicles increased linearly (P<0·001) and quadratically (P<0·05) with dietary Met concentration, and their weight relative to ovarian weight showed a linear (P<0·05) effect. Dietary Met level had a linear (P<0·05) and quadratic (P<0·001) effect on the gene expression of glutathione peroxidase (GPX1), HO-1 and Nrf2, and quadratically (P<0·05) increased contents of GPX and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) in liver of duck breeders. In addition, maternal dietary Met enhanced gene expression of GPX1, HO-1 and Nrf2, increased contents of GPX and T-AOC and reduced carbonylated protein in the brains of hatchlings. Overall, dietary Met concentration affected egg weight and albumen weight in laying duck breeders, which was partly due to gene expression of OVAL in oviduct magnum. A diet containing 4·0 g Met/kg would achieve optimal hepatic GPX1 and Nrf2 expression, maximise the activity of GPX and minimise lipid peroxidation.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1 Ingredients and nutrient composition of the basal diet for laying duck breeders, as-fed basis

Figure 1

Table 2 Primer sequences used for quantitative real-time PCR

Figure 2

Table 3 Effects of the dietary methionine (Met) level on the productivity (19–43 weeks) and reproductive performance (38–39 weeks) of duck breeders in the peak laying period (Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 3

Table 4 Effects of the dietary methionine (Met) level on the egg composition and quality of duck breeders during the laying period from 19 to 43 weeks of age (Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 4

Table 5 Effects of the dietary methionine (Met) level on ovary and oviduct-related indices for duck breeders at 43 weeks of age (Mean values with their standard errors mean, n 6)

Figure 5

Table 6 Effects of the dietary methionine (Met) level on antioxidative indices in livers of duck breeders at 43 weeks of age (Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 6

Table 7 Effects of the dietary methionine (Met) level on the relative hepatic expression of genes related to antioxidation and ovalbumin gene expression in oviduct magnum in duck breeders at 43 weeks of age (Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 7

Table 8 Effects of the maternal dietary methionine (Met) level of duck breeders at 38 weeks of age on antioxidant indices in the liver and brain of hatchlings (Mean values with their pooled standard errors, n 6)

Figure 8

Table 9 Effects of the maternal dietary methionine (Met) level of duck breeders at 38 weeks of age on the relative hepatic and cerebral expression levels of genes related to antioxidation in hatchlings (Mean values with their pooled standard errors, n 6)

Figure 9

Table 10 Estimations of the dietary methionine (Met) requirements based on quadratic regressions of egg weight, albumen weight, egg mass and hatchability, glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPX1), nuclear factor erythroid 2 like 2 (Nrf2) mRNA and GPX activity on dietary Met concentrations