Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T11:23:46.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Palimpsest tunnel valleys: evidence for relative timing of advances in an interlobate area of the Laurentide ice sheet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Alan E. Kehew
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, U.S.A
Linda P. Nicks
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, U.S.A
W. Thomas Straw
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, U.S.A
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During retreat from the lateWisconsinan maximum advance in the Great Lakes region of North America, the Laurentide ice sheet margin became distinctly lobate. The Lake Michigan, Saginaw, and Huron—Erie lobes converged in southern Michigan and Indiana, U.S.A. to form a complex interlobate region. Some time after the glacial maximum, the Lake Michigan lobe advanced over landscapes previously formed by the Saginaw lobe. This can be explained by an asynchronous advance of the Lake Michigan lobe during a Saginaw lobe retreat or by an increase in size of the Lake Michigan lobe relative to the Saginaw lobe during a synchronous readvance.

Cross-cutting relationships in southwestern Michigan, including palimpsest tunnel valleys, document the overriding of Saginaw lobe terrain. Deep, generally straight trenches parallel to glacial flow lines with hummocky, irregular sides and bottoms are interpreted as tunnel valleys. Saginaw lobe tunnel valleys trend northeast—southwest and Lake Michigan lobe tunnel valleys generally trend east—west.

At some time after a Saginaw lobe retreat in southern Michigan, the drumlinized landscape was overridden by an advance of the Lake Michigan lobe to an ice-marginal position at the Tekonsha moraine. Saginaw lobe tunnel valleys in the overridden area were completely filled with ice and debris from the Saginaw lobe retreat at the time of the Lake Michigan lobe advance. Supraglacial and proglacial sediments were deposited over the buried valleys by the Lake Michigan lobe, sometimes by meltwater streams that flowed at high angles to the trends of the valleys. After entrenchment of the Kalamazoo River valley, probably by a subglacial outburst flood, short tributaries were cut nearly at right angles across and through the debris and ice within several buried Saginaw lobe tunnel valleys. After the retreat of the Lake Michigan lobe, subsequent melting of ice in the palimpsest tunnel valleys exhumed the valleys, creating the cross-cutting relationships with the Lake Michigan lobe deposits.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1999
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Ice-marginal positions and approximate flow lines in central Great Lakes region at late Wisconsinan maximum, 21-20 kyr BP and when the ice margin was more lobate, about 15kyr BP. Modifiedfrom Fullerton (1986).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Study area showing morainal ridges (light dashed lines) formed by Lake Michigan, Saginaw and Huron- Erie lobes in Michigan and Indiana. The narrow extension of Saginaw lobe terrain to the southwest suggests the Lake Michigan lobe and Huron-Erie lobe overrode terrain previously covered by the Saginaw lobe. Arrows show directions of advance of the Lake Michigan and Huron-Erie lobes.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Ice-marginal positions and distribution of landforms discussed in text, including tunnel valleys associated with Lake Michigan (LM) and Saginaw (S) lobes. Saginaw lobe tunnel valleys west of Lake Michigan ice margin #1 (L.M. #1) are palimpsest valleys that werefilled with ice and debris during Lake Michigan lobe advance..

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Part of U.S. Geological Survey 1:100 000 Elkhart quadrangle showing the Sturgis moraine of the Saginaw lobe with two tunnel valleys (dashed lines) that extend beyond the ice margin into the area of proglacialfans.These valleys may have beenformed by the Saginaw lobe before its ice margin was at the Sturgis moraine. Contour interval is 5 m. North at top.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Part of U.S. Geological Survey Adams Park 1:24000 quadrangle. Hatched line is Lake Michigan lobe, Tekonsha ice- marginal position. Topographic scarp west of line is probably wave-cut scarp. Contour interval is 5ft ( ~1.5 m). North at top.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Part of U.S. Geological Survey Elkhart 1:100000 quadrangle. Two Lake Michigan lobe tunnel valleys, shown with dashed lines, extend south of Lake Michigan ice margin #2, indicating the Lake Michigan lobe previously advanced to the southeast. Outwash fan west of tunnel valleys is associated with ice margin #2. Tunnel valley must have been buried at time of fan deposition. Contour interval is 5 m. North at top.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Part of U.S. Geological Survey Schoolcraft NW, Kalamazoo and Portage 1:24 000 quadrangles. Palimpsest Saginaw lobe tunnel valley extends beyond Lake Michigan ice margin #2 from southwest to northeast. Outwash fan lobes slope continuously across valley, indicating that tunnel valley was filled with ice and debris at the time offan deposition. Contour interval is 10ft (~3 m). North at top.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Part of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24000 Galesburg quadrangle. Palimpsest Saginaw lobe tunnel valley shown with dashed line. South-trending valleys were cut across buried tunnel valley as tributaries to the Kalamazoo River valley, south of map. Contour interval is 10ft (~3 m) North at top.