Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T07:28:52.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Tunguska event and Cheko lake origin: dendrochronological analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2014

Fantucci Rosanna ,
Serra Romano ,
Kletetschka Gunther Open the ORCID record for Kletetschka Gunther [Opens in a new window]  and
Di Martino Mario
Fantucci Rosanna*
Affiliation:
Geologi Associati Fantucci e Stocchi, Montefiascone, VT, Italy
Serra Romano
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, BO, Italy
Kletetschka Gunther
Affiliation:
Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i., Institute of Geology, Czech Republic Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Di Martino Mario
Affiliation:
INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Pino Torinese, TO, Italy
*
e-mail: fantuccir@libero.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dendrochronological research was carried out on 23 trees samples (Larix sibirica and Picea obovata) sampled during the 1999 expedition in two locations, close to the epicentre zone and near Cheko lake (N 60°57′, E 101°51′). Basal Area Increment (BAI) analysis has shown a general long growth suppression before 1908, the year of Tunguska event (TE), followed by a sudden growth increase due to diminished competition of trees that died due to the event. In one group of the trees, we detected growth decrease for several years (due to damage to the trunk, branches and crown), followed by growth increase during the following 4–14 years. We show that trees that germinated after the TE, and living in close proximity of Cheko lake (Cheko lake trees) had different behaviour patterns when compared to those trees living further from Cheko lake, inside the forest (Forest trees). Cheko lake trees have shown a vigorous continuous growth increase. Forest trees have shown a vigorous growth during the first 10–30 years of age, followed by a period of suppressed growth. We interpret the suppressed growth by the re-established competition with the surroundings trees. Cheko lake pattern, however, is consistent with the formation of the lake at the time of TE. This observation supports the hypothesis that Cheko lake formation is due to a fragment originating during TE, creating a small impact crater into the permafrost and soft alluvial deposits of Kimku River plain. This is further supported by the fact that Cheko lake has an elliptical shape elongated towards the epicentre of TE.

Keywords

RussiaSiberiacosmic body impactcollapse craterdendrochronologyTunguskatree rings

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 345 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Borovicka, J., Spurny, P., Brown, P., Wiegert, P., Kalenda, P., Clark, D. & Shrbeny, L. (2013). The trajectory, structure and origin of the Chelyabinsk asteroidal impactor. Nature 503(7475), 235.Google Scholar
Bunch, T.E. et al. (2012). Very high-temperature impact melt products as evidence for cosmic airbursts and impacts 12,900 years ago. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109(28), E1903–E1912.Google Scholar
Di Martino, M. & Longo, G. (2000). An Italian scientific expedition in Tunguska. 3rd National Meeting of Planetary Sciences. Edited by Manara, A. and Dotto, E.. Bormio 24–30 January 2000 (34–38).Google Scholar
Fantucci, R., Di Martino, M. & Serra, R. (2012). Tree-ring dating of meteorite fall in Sikhote-Alin, Eastern Siberia–Russia. Int. J. Astrobiol. 11(1), 37–42.Google Scholar
Foot, R. & Yoon, T.L. (2002). Exotic meteoritic phenomena: the Tunguska event and anomalous low altitude fireballs – manifestations of the mirror world? Acta Phys. Polon. B 33(7), 1979–2009.Google Scholar
Fritts, H.C. (1976). Tree Rings and Climate. Academic Press, London/Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
Fritts, H.C. & Swetnam, T.W. (1989). Dendroecology: a tool for evaluating variation in past and present forest environments. Adv. Ecol. Res. 19, 111–188.Google Scholar
Gasperini, L., Alvisi, F., Biasini, G., Bonatti, E., Longo, G., Pipan, M., Ravaioli, M. & Serra, R. (2007). A possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska event. Terra Nova 19, 245–251.Google Scholar
Gasperini, L., Bonatti, E. & Longo, G. (2008). Cheko lake and the Tunguska event: impact or non-impact? Terra Nova 20, 169–172.Google Scholar
Gasperini, L., Bonatti, E., Albertazzi, S., Forlani, L., Accorsi, C., Longo, G., Ravaioli, M., Alvisi, F., Polonia, A. & Sacchetti, F. (2009). Sediments form Cheko lake (Siberia), a possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska event. Terra Nova 21, 489–494.Google Scholar
Gasperini, L., Cocchi, L., Stanghellini, C., Del Bianco, F., Serrazanetti, M. & Carmisciano, C. (2012). Magnetic and seismic reflection study of Cheko lake, a possible impact crater for the 1908 Tunguska event. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 13, Q05008, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Gladkochub, D., Pisarevsky, S., Donskaya, T., Natapov, L., Mazukabzov, A., Stanevich, A. & Sklyarov, E. (2006). The Siberian Craton and its evolution in terms of the Rodinia hypotesis. Episodes 29(3), 169–174.Google Scholar
Glasstone, S. & Dolan, J. (1977). The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, US Department of Defense.Google Scholar
Holmes, R.L. (1983). Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurements. Tree-ring Bull. 43, 69–78.Google Scholar
Kamo, S.L., Crowley, J. & Bowring, S.A. (2006). The Permian–Triassic boundary event and eruption of the Siberian flood basalts: an inter-laboratory U-Pb dating study. Geochem. Cosmichim. Acta 70, A303.Google Scholar
Kulik, L.A. (1939). Information relating to the Tunguska meteorite as of 1939 [in Russian]. Doklady Akad. Nauk Ukrain 22, 529–534.Google Scholar
Li, M.J. et al. (2005). Microshutter array development for the James Webb space telescope. In Micro- and Nanotechnology: Materials, Processes, Packaging, and Systems Ii, ed. Chiao, J.C., Jamieson, D.N., Faraone, L. & Dzurak, A.S., vol. 5650, pp. 9–16. Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering, Bellingham.Google Scholar
Le Blanc, D.C., Nicholas, N.S. & Zedaker, S.M. (1992). Prevalence of individual-tree growth decline in red spruce populations of the Appalachian Mountains. Can. J. Forest Res., 22, 905–914.Google Scholar
Longo, G. (1996). Zhivyie svideteli Tungusskoj katastrofy. Priroda 1, 40–47.Google Scholar
Longo, G. & Di Martino, M. (2002). Recalculation of the Tunguska Cosmic Body parameters on the basis of the 1938 and 1999 Aerophotosurveys. Asteroids, Comets, Meteors, ESA-SP 500, 843–846.Google Scholar
Longo, G. & Di Martino, M. (2003). Remote sensing investigation of the Tunguska Explosion Area in Remote Sensing 2002, 326–333.Google Scholar
Longo, G. & Serra, R. (2006). Effect of the Tunguska explosion on the wood of surviving conifers. In Proc. Fifth Int. Aerospace Congress. 27–31 August, Moscow.Google Scholar
Longo, G., Serra, , Cecchini, S. & Galli, M. (1994). Search for microremnants of the Tunguska cosmic body. Planet. Space Sci. 42(2), 163–177.Google Scholar
Longo, G., Di Martino, M., Andreev, G., Anfinogenov, J., Budaeva, L. & Kovrigin, E. (2005). A new unified catalogue and a new map of the 1908 tree fall in the site of the Tunguska Cosmic Body explosion. In Asteroid-Comet Hazard-2005, ed. Victor, S., pp. 222–225. Institute of Applied Astronomy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.Google Scholar
Longo, G., Gasperini, L., Bonatti, E., Serra, R. & Stanghellini., (2011). Consequences of the Tunguska impact and their interpretation. In Proc. 2011 IAA Planetary Defense Conf.: From Threat to Action. Contribution 2156964, May 9–12, Bucarest.Google Scholar
Moseley, S.H. et al. (2004). Microshutters arrays for the JWST near infrared spectrograph. In Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Space Telescopes, Pts 1–3, ed. Mather, J.C., vol. 5487, pp. 645–652. Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering, Bellingham.Google Scholar
Mousaev, E.K. (1996). Seasonal growth and tree-ring structure of Scots pine trees after Chernobyl (in Russian). Lesovedenie (Russian J. Forest) 1, 16–28.Google Scholar
NAVFAC COMMAND (1978). NBC Warfare Defense Ashore, US Department of the Navy.Google Scholar
Nesvetajlo, V.D. (1998) Consequences of the Tunguska catastrophe: dendroindication inferences. Planet. Space Sci. 46(2/3), 155–161.Google Scholar
Savidge, R.A. (1996). Xylogenesis, genetic and environmental regulation. A review. JAWA J. 17, 269–310.Google Scholar
Schweingruber, F.H. (1996). Tree Rings and Environment-Dendroecology. Haupt, Berne.Google Scholar
Schweingruber, F.H., Eckstein, D., Serre-Bachet, F. & Bräker, O.U. (1990). Identification, presentation and interpretation of event years and pointer years in dendrochronology. Dendrochronologia 8, 9–38.Google Scholar
Serra, , Cecchini, S., Galli, M. & Longo, G. (1994). Experimental hints on the fragmentation of the Tunguska Cosmic Body. Planet. Space Sci. 42(9), 777–783.Google Scholar
Stokes, M.A. & Smiley, T.L. (1986). An Introduction to Tree-ring Dating. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Svensen, H., Planke, S., Polozov, A.G., Schmidbauer, N., Corfu, F., Podladchikov, Y.Y. & Jamtveit, B. (2008). Siberian gas venting and the end-Permian evnironmental crisis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 277(3–4), 490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.11.015.Google Scholar
Ulmishek, G.F. (2001). Petroleum geology and resources of the Baykit Hish province, East Siberia, Russia. Geological Survey Bulletin 2201-F.Google Scholar
Vaganov, E.A. & Terskov, L.A. (1977). Tree growth analysis using tree-ring structure [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
Vaganov, E.A., Hughes, M.K., Silkin, P.P. & Nesvetailo, V.D. (2004). The Tunguska event in 1908: evidence from tree-ring anatomy. Astrobiology 4, 391–399.Google Scholar
Yonenobu, H. & Takenaka, C. (1998). The Tunguska event as recorded in a tree trunk. Proc. 16th Int. 14C Conf., 40, 367–371.Google Scholar