Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T09:00:04.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of co-ingestion of amino acids with rice on glycaemic and insulinaemic response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2015

Yean Yean Soong
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Singapore 117599, Singapore
Joseph Lim
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Singapore 117599, Singapore
Lijuan Sun
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Singapore 117599, Singapore
Christiani Jeyakumar Henry*
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Singapore 117599, Singapore Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore 117609, Singapore Department of Biochemistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117596, Singapore
*
* Corresponding author: C. J. Henry, fax +65 6776 6840, email jeya_henry@sics.a-star.edu.sg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consumption of high glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic response (GR) food such as white rice has been implicated in the development of type 2 diabetes. Previous studies have reported the ability of individual amino acids to reduce GR of carbohydrate-rich foods. Because of the bitter flavour of amino acids, they have rarely been used to reduce GR. We now report the use of a palatable, preformed amino acid mixture in the form of essence of chicken. In all, sixteen healthy male Chinese were served 68 or 136 ml amino acid mixture together with rice, or 15 or 30 min before consumption of white rice. Postprandial blood glucose and plasma insulin concentrations were measured at fasting and every 15 min after consumption of the meal until 60 min after the consumption of the white rice. Subsequent blood samples were taken at 30-min intervals until 210 min. The co-ingestion of 68 ml of amino acid mixture with white rice produced the best results in reducing the peak blood glucose and GR of white rice without increasing the insulinaemic response. It is postulated that amino acid mixtures prime β-cell insulin secretion and peripheral tissue uptake of glucose. The use of ready-to-drink amino acid mixtures may be a useful strategy for lowering the high-GI rice diets consumed in Asia.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Amino acid profile of essence of chicken determined by HPLC (n 3)*

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Protocol and schedule for treatment meal and blood sampling. A: 68 ml (T2) or 136 ml (T5); B: 68 ml (T3), 136 ml (T6); C: 68 ml (T4), 136 ml (T7). , Ingestion of treatment meal; , blood sampling time point.

Figure 2

Table 2 Dose and time of amino acid delivered in each treatment

Figure 3

Table 3 The baseline characteristics of subjects were age, height (ht), weight (wt), BMI, waist circumference (WC) and fasting blood glucose (FBG) (Averages with their standard deviations)

Figure 4

Table 4 Peak time and glucose concentration (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 5

Fig. 2 (A) Mean changes in capillary blood glucose and (B) incremental AUC (IAUC) glucose in healthy subjects (n 16) after consumption of the test meals. , T1; , T2; , T5. (A) a,b,c,d,e,fValues at the same time point and (B) bars with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05). (T1) White rice; white rice with amino acids (T2) 68 ml at 0 min, (T3) 68 ml at −15 min, (T4) 68 ml at −30 min, (T5) 136 ml at 0 min, (T6) 136 ml at −15 min and (T7) 136 ml at −30 min.

Figure 6

Fig. 3 (A) Mean changes in plasma insulin and (B) incremental AUC (IAUC) insulin in healthy subjects (n 16) after consumption of the test meals. , T1; , T2; , T5. (A) a,b,c,dValues at the same time point with unlike letters were significantly different (P<0·05). (T1) White rice; white rice with amino acids (T2) 68 ml at 0 min, (T3) 68 ml at −15 min, (T4) 68 ml at −30 min, (T5) 136 ml at 0 min, (T6) 136 ml at −15 min and (T7) 136 ml at −30 min.

Figure 7

Fig. 4 Incremental AUC (IAUC) glycaemic response at 120 min v. insulinogenic index (IGI). R2 0·22 (P<0·01).

Figure 8

Table 5 Peak insulin time and concentration, difference between incremental peak and nadir insulinaemic response, and insulinogenic index (IGI) of the plasma insulin in healthy subjects (Mean values with their standard errors)