Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T14:11:30.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of short-term coenzyme Q10 supplementation and pre-cooling strategy on cardiac damage markers in elite swimmers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2018

Ali Emami
Affiliation:
Department of Exercise Physiology and Corrective Movement, Sport Sciences Faculty, Urmia University, Urmia, 57561-51818, Iran
Asghar Tofighi*
Affiliation:
Department of Exercise Physiology and Corrective Movement, Sport Sciences Faculty, Urmia University, Urmia, 57561-51818, Iran
Siamak Asri-Rezaei
Affiliation:
Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Pathology, Veterinary Medicine Faculty, Urmia University, Urmia, 57561-51818, Iran
Behnaz Bazargani-Gilani
Affiliation:
Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Veterinary Science Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, 65178-38695, Iran
*
* Corresponding author: Asghar Tofighi, email a.tofighi@urmia.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Strenuous physical exercise and hyperthermia may paradoxically induce oxidative stress and adverse effects on myocardial function. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 14-d coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) supplementation and pre-cooling on serum creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), cardiac Troponin I (cTnI), myoglobin (Mb), lactate dehydrogenase (LD), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), lipid peroxidation (LPO) and CoQ10 concentration in elite swimmers. In total, thirty-six healthy males (mean age 17 (sd 1) years) were randomly selected and divided into four groups of supplementation, supplementation with pre-cooling, pre-cooling and control. During an eighteen-session protocol in the morning and evening, subjects attended speed and endurance swimming training sessions for 5 km in each session. Blood sampling was done before (two stages) and after (two stages) administration of CoQ10 and pre-cooling. ANCOVA and repeated measurement tests with Bonferroni post hoc test were used for the statistical analysis of the data. There was no significant statistical difference among groups for the levels of CK-MB, cTnI, Mb, LD, TAC, LPO and CoQ10 at the presampling (stages 1 and 2) (P>0·05). However, pre-cooling and control groups show a significant increase in the levels of CK-MB, cTnI, Mb, LD and LPO compared with the supplementation and supplementation with pre-cooling groups in the post-sampling (stages 1 and 2) (P<0·05), except for the TAC and CoQ10. Consequently, CoQ10 supplementation prevents adverse changes of myocardial damage and oxidative stress during swimming competition phase. Meanwhile, the pre-cooling strategy individually has no desired effect on the levels of CK-MB, cTnI, Mb, LD, LPO, TAC and CoQ10.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2018 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 General approach of the research process. CoQ10, coenzyme Q10.

Figure 1

Table 1 Participants’ food and energy amount received (Mean values and standard deviations; n 9)

Figure 2

Table 2 Participants’ physical characteristics (Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB). Values are means (n 9) and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. A,B,C Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the group measurement (P<0·05). a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P<0·05). CoQ10, coenzyme Q10. , CoQ10; , CoQ10+pre-cooling; , pre-cooling; , control.

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Troponin I (cTnI). Values are means (n 9) and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. A,B,C Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the group measurement (P<0·05). a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P<0·05). CoQ10, coenzyme Q10. , CoQ10; , CoQ10+pre-cooling; , pre-cooling; , control.

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Lactate dehydrogenase (LD). Values are means (n 9) and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. A,B Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the group measurement (P<0·05). a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P<0·05). CoQ10, coenzyme Q10. , CoQ10; , CoQ10+pre-cooling; , pre-cooling; , control.

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Myoglobin (Mb). Values are means (n 9) and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. A,B,C Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the group measurement (P<0·05). a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P<0·05). CoQ10, coenzyme Q10. , CoQ10; , CoQ10+pre-cooling; , pre-cooling; , control.

Figure 7

Fig. 6 Lipid peroxidation (LPO). Values are means (n 9) and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. A,B,C Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the group measurement (P<0·05). a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P<0·05). CoQ10, coenzyme Q10. , CoQ10; , CoQ10+pre-cooling; , pre-cooling; , control.

Figure 8

Fig. 7 Total antioxidant capacity (TAC). Values are means (n 9) and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. A,B,C Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the group measurement (P<0·05). a,b,c,d Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P<0·05). CoQ10, coenzyme Q10. , CoQ10; , CoQ10+pre-cooling; , pre-cooling; , control.

Figure 9

Fig. 8 Coenzyme Q10 concentration (CoQ10). Values are means (n 9) and standard deviations represented by vertical bars. A,B Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the group measurement (P<0·05). a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P<0·05). CoQ10, coenzyme Q10. , CoQ10; , CoQ10+pre-cooling; , pre-cooling; , control.