Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T00:05:35.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gut metabolomic profiles in paediatric ulcerative colitis patients prior to and after receiving faecal microbiota transplants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2023

Parastou S. Khalessi Hosseini
Affiliation:
Los Angeles County – University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Gastroenterology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Beibei Wang
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Yihui Luan
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan, China
Fengzhu Sun
Affiliation:
Quantitative and Computational Biology and Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Sonia Michail*
Affiliation:
Quantitative and Computational Biology and Mathematics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Gastroenterology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Sonia Michail; Email: Sonia.michail@hotmail.com

Abstract

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an immune-mediated inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Gut microbiota dysbiosis may play a significant role in disease pathogenesis by causing shifts in metabolomic profiles within the gut. To identify differences and trends in the metabolomic profile of paediatric UC patients pre- and post-faecal microbiota transplants (FMT). Forty-six paediatric patients with mild-to-moderate UC and 30 healthy paediatric patients were enrolled in this study. Baseline stool samples were collected prior to FMT initiation and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 post-FMT. Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) scores were calculated at baseline and months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after FMT. The average Bray–Curtis dissimilarities to healthy subjects decreased after FMT. In principal coordinate analysis plots, UC patients’ centroids drew nearer to healthy individuals. The variance explained by phenotype (Healthy versus UC) reduced and remained significant. From 1 to 3 months after FMT, PUCAI trends were statistically significant and decreasing. PUCAI scores remain flat starting 6 months after FMT. This study concludes that paediatric UC patients have a significantly different baseline metabolite profile than healthy controls. Although being time limited, FMT significantly altered these metabolite profiles and shifted them towards that of healthy controls.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographics of paediatric healthy controls and UC cases.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Shows the microbiota profile of donors by (A.) genus and (B.) species.

Figure 2

Figure 2. The metabolomic profiles of UC patients progressed to healthy levels after FMT. (A1)–(A5), PCoA plots based on metabolomics (Bray–Curtis dissimilarities on relative abundance) for Healthy controls versus UC cases at Baseline (A1), Healthy controls versus UC cases at 1 month after FMT (A2), Healthy controls versus UC cases at 3 months after FMT (A3), Healthy controls versus UC cases after 6 months after FMT (A4), and Healthy controls versus UC cases after 12 months after FMT (A5), separately. Box plots of PCoA and PCoA2 were shown in the margins of PCoA plots. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare the differences between Healthy and UC subjects at different time points after FMT, with ns (not significant) for p > 0.05, * for p <= 0.05, ** for p <= 0.01, *** for p <= 0.001, and **** for p <= 0.0001. (B) Quantitative differences between Healthy and UC subjects at different time points, including average Bray–Curtis dissimilarities between two groups, Euclidean distance between centroids of two groups in PCoA plots (A1)–(A5), variance explained (R2) by phenotype (Healthy versus UC) and respective p-value determined by PERMANOVA on metabolomics (Bray–Curtis distance on relative abundance).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Heat maps showing the log-transformed abundance of differentially abundant metabolites identified by MaAsLin2. Metabolites were grouped according to their classifications (left bar), and the samples were grouped by their phenotypes and time points after FMT for UC patients (top bar). The panel in the left column indicated the coefficients and BH-FDR corrected q values for the coefficients from the linear fixed effects model (Healthy versus UC, with Healthy as the reference group) or linear mixed effects model (UC versus UC at different time points, with UC patients at the previous time point as reference group), with black for higher abundances in the latter group, grey for lower in the latter group, and white for no significant differences between two groups, and * for FDR corrected q value <0.05, ** for FDR-corrected q value <0.01, and *** for FDR-corrected q value <0.001. The panel in the right column showed the log-transformed abundance of differentially abundant metabolites.

Figure 4

Table 2. Baseline PUCAI and Endoscopic Mayo scores for 50 paediatric UC patients.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Box plots of PUCAI scores for UC patients at different time points, including baseline, 1 month after FMT, 3 months after FMT, 6 months after FMT, and 12 months after FMT. The grey lines in the figure mark the trajectories of each patient over time. Pair-wise comparisons were performed using paired Wilcoxon rank sum tests, with ns (not significant) for p >0.05 and **** for p <= 0.0001. Two patients with missing data (UC012 with 3, 6, and 12 months after FMT missing and UC015 with 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after FMT missing) were not included in the analysis.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Multivariate analysis showing the amount of inferred variance explained (R2) (A) by each covariate and respective p-value (B) determined by PERMANOVA on metabolomics (Bray–Curtis distance on relative abundance). The variance explained by each variable was calculated independently of other variables (the sole variable in the model) to avoid issues related to variable ordering. Time points, CDI history, medication, ethnicity, and FMT type explained a significant but limited fraction of UC patients’ total variation in metabolomics.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Box plots of the log-transformed abundance of CDI history related metabolites for UC patients at different time points, including baseline, 1 month after FMT, 3 months after FMT, 6 months after FMT, and 12 months after FMT. The differences between patients with and without CDI history were tested using a linear model (equation [3]) within each time point, with ns for not significant, and BH-FDR-corrected q-value annotated.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Box plots of the log-transformed abundance of ethnicity related metabolites for UC patients at different time points, including baseline, 1 month after FMT, 3 months after FMT, 6 months after FMT, and 12 months after FMT. The differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic were tested using a linear model (equation [3]) within each time point, with ns for not significant, and BH-FDR-corrected q-value annotated.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Box plots of the log-transformed abundance of FMT type related metabolites for UC patients at different time points, including baseline, 1 month after FMT, 3 months after FMT, 6 months after FMT, and 12 months after FMT. The differences between patients taking autologous FMT and patients taking heterologous FMT were tested using a linear model (equation [3]) within each time point, with ns for not significant, and BH-FDR-corrected q-value annotated.