Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T17:20:06.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rapid changes in key ruminal microbial populations during the induction of and recovery from diet-induced milk fat depression in dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2015

D. E. Rico
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Penn State University, University Park, 301 Henning Building, PA 16802, USA
S. H. Preston
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Penn State University, University Park, 301 Henning Building, PA 16802, USA
J. M. Risser
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Penn State University, University Park, 301 Henning Building, PA 16802, USA
K. J. Harvatine*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Penn State University, University Park, 301 Henning Building, PA 16802, USA
*
* Corresponding author: Dr K. J. Harvatine, fax +1 814 863 6042, email kjh182@psu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ruminant provides a powerful model for understanding the temporal dynamics of gastrointestinal microbial communities. Diet-induced milk fat depression (MFD) in the dairy cow is caused by rumen-derived bioactive fatty acids, and is commonly attributed to the changes in the microbial population. The aim of the present study was to determine the changes occurring in nine ruminal bacterial taxa with well-characterised functions, and abundance of total fungi, ciliate protozoa and bacteria during the induction of and recovery from MFD. Interactions between treatment and time were observed for ten of the twelve populations. The total number of both fungi and ciliate protozoa decreased rapidly (days 4 and 8, respectively) by more than 90 % during the induction period and increased during the recovery period. The abundance of Streptococcus bovis (amylolytic) peaked at 350 % of control levels on day 4 of induction and rapidly decreased during the recovery period. The abundance of Prevotella bryantii (amylolytic) decreased by 66 % from day 8 to 20 of the induction period and increased to the control levels on day 12 of the recovery period. The abundance of Megasphaera elsdenii and Selenomonas ruminantium (lactate-utilising bacteria) increased progressively until day 12 of induction (>170 %) and decreased during the recovery period. The abundance of Fibrobacter succinogenes (fibrolytic) decreased by 97 % on day 4 of induction and increased progressively to an equal extent during the recovery period, although smaller changes were observed for other fibrolytic bacteria. The abundance of the Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens/Pseudobutyrivibrio group decreased progressively during the induction period and increased during the recovery period, whereas the abundance of Butyrivibrio hungatei was not affected by treatment. Responsive taxa were modified rapidly, with the majority of changes occurring within 8 d and their time course was similar to the time course of the induction of MFD, demonstrating a strong correlation between changes in ruminal microbial populations and MFD.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Treatment assignment of a repeated design to study the induction of and recovery from diet-induced milk fat depression

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Time course of the total abundance of (a) fungi, (b) ciliate protozoa and (c) bacteria during the induction of and recovery from milk fat depression. Data are plotted relative to day 0 of the control period. Dairy cows were fed a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet (control; ), a low-fibre, high-PUFA diet resulting in milk fat depression (induction; ), or a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet following induction that resolved milk fat depression (recovery; ). Values are least-squares means, with their largest standard errors of the mean ((a) sem 0·64, (b) sem 0·91 and (c) sem 0·23). Mean value for the induction group was significantly different from that of the control group: * P< 0·10, ** P< 0·05, *** P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). Mean value for the recovery group was significantly different from that of the control group: † P< 0·10, †† P< 0·05, ††† P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). For fungi and ciliate protozoa, there was a significant main effect of treatment (P< 0·001 both), but no effect for time (P= 0·45 and P= 0·54, respectively), and the treatment × time effect was significant (P< 0·001 both). For bacteria, there was a significant treatment × time effect (P= 0·02), but no effects for treatment (P= 0·21) and time (P= 0·38).

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Time course of the relative abundance of amylolytic bacteria ((a) Streptococcus bovis and (b) Prevotellabryantii) in the rumen digesta of dairy cows fed a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet (control; ), a low-fibre, high-PUFA diet resulting in milk fat depression (induction; ), or a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet following induction that resolved milk fat depression (recovery; ). Abundance of the bacterial species is expressed as a percentage of total bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA. Values are least-squares means, with their largest standard errors of the mean ((a) sem 0·017 and (b) sem 0·053). Mean value for the induction group was significantly different from that of the control group: ** P< 0·05 and *** P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). Mean value for the recovery group was significantly different from that of the control group: † P< 0·10, †† P< 0·05, ††† P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). For S. bovis, there were significant main effects for treatment (P< 0·001) and time (P= 0·04), and the treatment × time effect was significant (P< 0·001). For P.bryantii, there was a significant main effect of treatment (P< 0·01), but no effect for time (P= 0·18). There was a significant treatment × time effect (P< 0·01).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Time course of the relative abundance of lactate-utilising bacteria ((a) Megasphaera elsdenii and (b) Selenomonas ruminantium) in the rumen digesta of dairy cows fed a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet (control; ), a low-fibre, high-PUFA diet resulting in milk fat depression (induction; ), or a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet following induction that resolved milk fat depression (recovery; ). Abundance of the bacterial species is expressed as a percentage of total bacterial 16S rDNA. Values are least-squares means, with their largest standard errors of the mean ((a) sem 0·0050 and (b) sem 0·043). Mean value for the induction group was significantly different from that of the control group: ** P< 0·05, *** P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). †† Mean value for the recovery group was significantly different from that of the control group (P< 0·05; pre-planned contrasts). For M. elsdenii and S. ruminantium, there was a significant main effect of treatment (P= 0·02 and P< 0·01, respectively), but no effect for time (P= 0·59 and P= 0·34, respectively). There was a significant treatment × time effect (P= 0·01 and P< 0·01, respectively).

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Time course of the relative abundance of fibrolytic bacteria ((a) Ruminococcus albus, (b) Fibrobacter succinogenes and (c) Prevotella ruminicola) in the rumen digesta of dairy cows fed a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet (control; ), a low-fibre, high-PUFA diet resulting in milk fat depression (induction; ), or a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet following induction that resolved milk fat depression (recovery; ). Abundance of the bacterial species is expressed as a percentage of total bacterial 16S rDNA. Values are least-squares means, with their largest standard errors of the mean ((a) sem 0·049, (b) sem 0·359 and (c) sem 0·247). Mean value for the induction group was significantly different from that of the control group: * P< 0·10, ** P< 0·05, *** P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). Mean value for the recovery group was significantly different from that of the control group: † P< 0·10, ††† P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). For R. albus, there was a significant main effect of time (P= 0·02), but no effect for treatment (P= 0·24). There was a significant treatment × time effect (P< 0·01). For F. succinogenes, there was a significant main effect of treatment (P< 0·001), but no effect for time (P= 0·13). There was a significant treatment × time effect (P< 0·001). For P. ruminicola, there was a significant main effect of treatment (P< 0·01), but no effect for time (P= 0·10). There was no significant treatment × time effect (P= 0·59).

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Time course of the relative abundance of trans-11 18 : 1-producing bacteria ((a) Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens/Pseudobutyrivibrio group and (b) Butyrivibrio hungatei) in the rumen digesta of dairy cows fed a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet (control; ), a low-fibre, high-PUFA diet resulting in milk fat depression (induction; ), or a high-fibre, low-PUFA diet following induction that resolved milk fat depression (recovery; ). Abundance of the bacterial species is expressed as a percentage of total bacterial 16S rDNA. Values are least-squares means, with their largest standard errors of the mean ((a) sem 0·273 and (b) sem 0·017). Mean value for the induction group was significantly different from that of the control group: ** P< 0·05, *** P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). Mean value for the recovery group was significantly different from that of the control group: †† P< 0·05, ††† P< 0·01 (pre-planned contrasts). For the B. fibrisolvens/Pseudobutyrivibrio group, there was a significant effect of treatment (P< 0·01), but no effect for time (P= 0·15). There was a significant treatment × time effect (P< 0·001). For B. hungatei, there was no significant effect for treatment (P= 0·52) or time (P= 0·33), and no significant treatment × time effect (P= 0·67).

Figure 6

Table 2 Associations between milk fat and trans-10 18 : 1 concentrations and selected rumen microbes

Supplementary material: File

Rico Supplementary Material

Tables 1-3 and Figure 1

Download Rico Supplementary Material(File)
File 145.5 KB