Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T00:47:22.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of organic or inorganic material in Martian meteorite Zagami by vibrational spectroscopy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2020

Bruno Leonardo do Nascimento-Dias*
Affiliation:
Physics, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Maria Elizabeth Zucolotto
Affiliation:
Geology, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Hugo Camarano Belgo
Affiliation:
Physics, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil Chemistry, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Talita Valverde Ferreira da Silva
Affiliation:
Chemistry, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Virgĩlio de Carvalho dos Anjos
Affiliation:
Physics, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Bruno Leonardo do Nascimento-Dias, E-mail: bruno.astrobio@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Zagami is a basaltic shergottite well characterized among Martian meteorites. For this reason, it is used as a reference sample to verify the feasibility of the vibrational spectroscopy techniques. In general, these techniques seeking extract spectral signatures from individual mineral present in the meteorite samples. Among some FTIR results were detected organic compounds in the Zagami meteorite and recorded in some articles. Based on these results, an analysis of a Zagami meteorite sample was performed using FTIR and Raman spectrometry. Examining the fragment of Zagami meteorite using the FTIR technique, it was possible to identify the same band of 2920 and 2850 cm−1 described by other references, which were interpreted as organic components and were recorded such as aliphatic hydrocarbon. Another unusual result in Martian meteorite was the detection of the 1300 cm−1 band using Raman. The main reason for this peculiarity is that band is characterized in meteorites as a D band. Generally, this band is attributed to structural defects and the disordering of carbon. However, care should be taken when interpreting Raman spectra around 1300 cm−1 and FTIR spectra 2950–2840 cm−1 of the sample from oxidizing environments such as Mars. Misconceptions can occur during the interpretations of the bands, and this can lead to incorrect identification. Thus, an analysis of the mentioned peaks, such as chemical and mineralogical assignments, will be provided and suggested in order to compare the results that mentioned the presence of organic compounds in the Zagami meteorite.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Fragment of Martian meteorite Zagami used in this work.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. FTIR spectrum obtained from the Martian meteorite fragment.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Reference spectrum by Lakshmi Reddy et al. (2015) to compare with the result obtained.

Figure 3

Table 1. Peaks obtained compared with data from published reference articles: Reference A is Lakshmi Reddy et al. (2015) and Reference B is Cui et al. (2013)

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Raman spectrum obtained from the Zagami meteorite.

Figure 5

Table 2. Data with the peaks obtained and comparison with the data of pure minerals also obtained through Raman dp RRUFF database

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Comparative spectrum between the result obtained from the Martian meteorite fragment and the pure minerals from the RRUFF database.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Second Raman spectrum obtained from the Zagami meteorite.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Comparative spectrum between the result obtained from the Martian meteorite fragment and the spectrum obtained by Seifert et al. (2010).

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Image of a spectrum obtained and published by Anderson et al. (2005) when it presents the presence of organic matter in the Martian meteorite Zagami.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Comparative spectrum between the result obtained from the Martian meteorite fragment and the spectrum obtained by Lakshmi Reddy et al. (2015).

Figure 11

Table 3.

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Illustrative representation of bands D and G.

Figure 13

Fig. 11. Illustrative representation of 2LO mode of hematite.

Figure 14

Fig. 12. Schematic system of magnetite and hematite production from different possible processes by Posth et al. (2013).

Figure 15

Fig. 13. Representation of three different trajectories for the formation of hematite and magnetite with high, low or without organic matter present in the process of Posth et al. (2013).