Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T21:41:02.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of peanut meal extracts fermented by Bacillus natto on the growth performance, learning and memory skills and gut microbiota modulation in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2019

Xiaoyang Jiang
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China College of Life Sciences, Institute of Advanced Cross-Field Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Haoyue Ding
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Qing Liu
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Yuxi Wei
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Institute of Advanced Cross-Field Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Yuanjie Zhang
Affiliation:
Health Supervision Institute, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China
Yanping Wang
Affiliation:
Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Feixian County 273400, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Yaqian Lu
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Aiguo Ma
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Zichao Li*
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Institute of Advanced Cross-Field Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Yingfen Hu*
Affiliation:
College of Life Sciences, Institute of Advanced Cross-Field Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding authors: Yingfen Hu, email qingdahyf2006@163.com; Zichao Li, email zichaoli@qdu.edu.cn
*Corresponding authors: Yingfen Hu, email qingdahyf2006@163.com; Zichao Li, email zichaoli@qdu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated that the nutritional properties of peanut meal (PM) can be improved after being fermented. The assessment of fermented PM has been reported to be limited to various physical and chemical evaluations in vitro. In the present study, PM was fermented by Bacillus natto to explore the effects of fermented PM extract (FE) on growth performance, learning and memory ability and intestinal microflora in mice. Ninety newly weaned male Kunming (KM) mice were randomly divided into seven groups: normal group (n 20), low-dose FE group (n 10), middle-dose FE group (MFE) (n 10), high-dose FE group (HFE) (n 20), unfermented extraction group (n 10), model group (10) and natural recovery group (10). Learning and memory skills were performed by the Morris water maze (MWM) test, and the variation in gut microbiota (GM) composition was assessed by 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing. The results show that HFE remarkably improved the growth performance in mice. In the MWM test, escape latency was shortened in both MFE and HFE groups, while the percentage of time, distance in target quadrant and the number crossing over the platform were significantly increased in the HFE group. Moreover, the FE played a preventive role in the dysbacteriosis of mice induced by antibiotic and increased the richness and species evenness of GM in mice.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Authors 2019 
Figure 0

Table 1. Composition in fermented peanut meal extract and determination methods

Figure 1

Table 2. Determined main composition in fermented peanut meal extract

Figure 2

Fig. 1. (A) Average daily body weight gain (ADG) of mice in each group; (B) liver index of mice in each group; (C) spleen index of mice in each group; (D) kidney index of mice in each group. ADG = (last weight − first weight)/test date; viscera index = viscera weight (g)/body weight (g) × 100 %; values are presented as mean values with their standard errors. aP < 0·05 v. N group; bP < 0·05 v. UFE group. N, normal group; LFE, low-dose of fermented peanut meal extract (FE) group; MFE, middle-dose of FE group; HFE, high-dose of FE group; UFE, unfermented extraction group.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. (A) Swimming trajectory of mice from each group in probe trial; (B) escape latencies of each group in 5 d training trials; percentage of time (C) and distance (D) in target quadrant; number crossing over the position of the platform (E) and swimming speeds (F) in the probe trial. Values are presented as mean values with their standard errors. (B) , N; , LFE; , MFE; , HFE; , UFE. aP < 0·05 v. N group; bP < 0·05 v. UFE group. N, normal group; LFE, low-dose of fermented peanut meal extract (FE) group; MFE, middle-dose of FE group; HFE, high-dose of FE group; UFE, unfermented extraction group.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. (A) Relative abundances of the gut microbiota at the phylum level in mice of each group. The stack column diagram indicates the bacterial phyla composition of different groups, and different colours represent different kinds of bacterial phyla. (B) Relative abundances of the gut microbiota at the genus level in mice of each group. The stack column diagram indicates the bacterial genus composition of different groups, and different colours represent different kinds of bacterial genus. (C) Cluster map of species abundance. A, normal group; B, model group; C, natural recovery group; D, fermented peanut meal extract group. (A) , Others; , Fusobacteria; , Cyanobacteria; , Actinobacteria; , Deferribacteres; , Tenericutes; , Proteobacteria; , Firmicutes; , Bacteroidetes. (B) , Others; , Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group; , Peptoclostridium; , Escherichia-Shigella; , Lachnospiraceae_UCG-001; , Parasutterella; , Helicobacter; , Enterobacter; , Parabacteroides; , Lachnospiraceae_NK4A136_group; , Bacteroides. (C) , 1; , 0·5; , 0; , −0·5; , 0; , −1; Phylum: , Bacteroidetes; , Deferribacteres; , Firmicutes; , Proteobacteria; , Tenericutes.

Figure 5

Table 3. Relative abundances of the gut microbiota at the genus level in mice of each group (%)

Figure 6

Fig. 4. (A) Chao1 values; (B) observed species and (C) Shannon values of the gut microbiota in mice of each group. Values are presented as box plots. A, normal group; B, model group; C, natural recovery group; D, fermented peanut meal extract group. aP < 0·05 v. group A; bP < 0·05 v. group B; cP < 0·05 v. group C.

Figure 7

Table 4. The P values of the five main α-diversity indices between groups

Figure 8

Fig. 5. (A) Rarefaction curves and (B) operational taxonomic unit (OTU) rank curves. A, normal group; B, model group; C, natural recovery group; D, fermented peanut meal extract group. (A) , A; , B; , C; , D. (B) , A; , B; , C; , D.