Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T12:42:36.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-monetary intervention to discourage consumption of single-use plastic bags

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2020

GAURI CHANDRA
GAURI CHANDRA*
Affiliation:
Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
*
*Correspondence to: Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford, 120 Walton St, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK. E-mail: gauri.chandra@bsg.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The over-utilization of plastic bags has pushed governments to implement a mix of policy measures ranging from banning the bags altogether to charging a fee for them. However, these policies are often accompanied by unintended consequences. Paying for plastic bags, in particular, may crowd out the negative emotions tied to their harmful impact on the environment, and may be subject to a ‘rebound effect’. In a randomized controlled experiment, I tested four different treatments aimed at nudging or encouraging consumers to carry their own bag to the stores. Specifically, I tested the effects of changing the framing of the question regarding carrier bags at the checkout till in stores using a yes/no response format, in which the yes option corresponds to the desired behaviour. The treatment with the yes/no framing format was found to have as strong and significant an effect as a charge of 5 pence per bag on discouraging single-use plastic bag consumption.

Information

Type
New Voices
Information
Behavioural Public Policy , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 143 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BHI (2012), Two Years of the Washington, D.C. Bag Tax: An Analysis, Washington, DC: Beacon Hill Institute.Google Scholar
Convery, et al. (2007), ‘The Most Popular Tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish Plastic Bags Levy’, Environmental and Resource Economics, 1–11.Google Scholar
DEFRA (2017), Single-use plastic carrier bags charge: data in England for 2016 to 2017, DEFRA.Google Scholar
DEFRA (2018), Plastic bag charge set to be rolled out to all retailers. Retrieved from www.gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/plastic-bag-charge-set-to-be-rolled-out-to-all-retailersGoogle Scholar
Environmental Agency UK (2011), Life cycle assessment of supermarket carrier bags: a review of the bags available in 2006, Bristol: Environment Agency, Horizon House, Deanery Road, Bristol.Google Scholar
Falk, A. and Szech, N. (2013), Morals and Markets. Science.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (2006), Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J., Atkinson, G. and Disney, K. (2011), ‘From irresponsible knaves to responsible knights for just 5p: behavioural public policy and the environment’, in Oliver, A., Behavioural Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, 63–93.Google Scholar
Nicolaas, G. A. (2015), ‘Revisiting “yes/no” versus “check all that apply”: Results from a mixed modes experiment.’, Survey Research Methods.Google Scholar
Oberholzer-Gee, B. S. (1997), ‘The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding- Out’, The American Economic Review, 746–755.Google Scholar
Putnam-Farr, E. and Riis, J. (2016), ‘“Yes/No/Not Right Now”: Yes/No Response Formats Can Increase Response Rates Even in Non-Forced-Choice Settings’, Journal of Marketing Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rennie, L., Uskul, A. K., Adams, C. and Appleton, K. (2014), ‘Visualisation for increasing health intentions: enhanced effects following a health message and when using a first-person perspective’, Psychology & Health, 29(2), 237–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rivers, N., Shentone-Harris, S. and Young, N. (2016), ‘Using Nudges to reduce waste? The case if Toronto's plastic bag levy’, Journal of Environmental Management.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
WRAP (2013), Effect of charging for carrier bags on big-bag sales in Wales. Retrieved from wrap.org.uk:http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/Effect%20of%20charging%20for%20carrier%20bags%20on%20bin-bag%20sales%20in%20Wales.pdfGoogle Scholar