Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T06:52:51.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid does not increase body fat loss induced by energy restriction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

Arrate Lasa
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of País Vasco, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006Vitoria, Spain
Itziar Churruca
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of País Vasco, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006Vitoria, Spain
Edurne Simón
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of País Vasco, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006Vitoria, Spain
Alfredo Fernández-Quintela
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of País Vasco, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006Vitoria, Spain
Victor Manuel Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of País Vasco, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006Vitoria, Spain
María Puy Portillo*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of País Vasco, Paseo de la Universidad 7, 01006Vitoria, Spain
*
*Corresponding author: Dr María P. Portillo, fax +34 945 013014, email mariapuy.portillo@ehu.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Very little evidence exists concerning the effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on body fat reduction induced by energy restriction. Moreover, although an effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on lipolysis has been suggested, it has not been consistently shown. The aims of the present study were to determine whether trans-10, cis-12-CLA increases the reduction of body fat induced by energy restriction, and to analyse its effect on lipolysis and adipose tissue lipase expression (hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) and adipose tissue TAG lipase (ATGL)). Male Syrian Golden hamsters were fed a high-fat diet during 7 weeks in order to make them fatter. Then they were submitted to a mild energy restriction (25 %) without or with supplementation of 0·5 % trans-10, cis-12-CLA for 3 weeks. Basal glycerol release and lipolysis stimulated by several drugs acting at different levels of the lipolytic cascade were measured in epididymal adipose tissue. The expression of HSL and ATGL was assessed by real-time RT-PCR. No differences were found in adipose tissues size between the experimental groups. Medium adipocyte size and total number of adipocytes were similar in both experimental groups. Animals fed the CLA-enriched diet showed similar lipolytic rates as well as HSL and ATGL expressions to the controls. In conclusion, trans-10, cis-12-CLA does not promote adipose tissue lipid mobilisation nor does it heighten body fat reduction induced by energy restriction. Consequently, this CLA isomer does not seem to be a useful tool to be included in body weight-loss strategies followed in obesity treatment.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008

Numerous studies performed on rodents and pigs have clearly demonstrated that the trans-10, cis-12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) reduces adiposity by decreasing fat deposition. This body fat-lowering effect has been observed when CLA is added to either normal-fat or high-fat diets(Reference Kelley and Erickson1Reference Navarro, Fernandez-Quintela, Churruca and Portillo4).

Although several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this CLA effect, it seems that it acts primarily by reducing the activities of lipoprotein lipase and stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase, two key enzymes of lipid storage. Indeed, the general consensus achieved concerning the effects of CLA on these enzymes supports the effect on fat accretion(Reference Wang and Jones2, Reference Park, Albright, Storkson, Liu and Pariza5). Lipoprotein lipase hydrolyses fatty acids from circulating TAG, thus enhancing fatty acid uptake, and re-esterification by the adipocytes, and stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase is the rate-limiting enzyme for converting SFA to MUFA, the main substrate for fat deposit in adipose tissue. Consequently, the reduction in lipoprotein lipase and stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase activities suggests an impairment in adipocyte replenishment.

In contrast, very little evidence exists concerning the effects of CLA on body fat reduction induced by energy restriction(Reference Stangl6, Reference Diaz, Watkins, Li, Anderson and Campbell7). Moreover, although an effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on lipolysis has been suggested, it has not been consistently shown, and at present there is little support for this hypothesis(Reference Park, Albright, Liu, Storkson, Cook and Pariza8Reference Simon, Macarulla, Fernandez-Quintela, Rodriguez and Portillo11).

As a result, it can be stated that trans-10, cis-12-CLA blocks body fat gain but does not necessarily reduce body fat level accumulated before CLA administration, so it is too early to predict the extent to which CLA supplements could be useful in enhancing body fat loss promoted by dietary treatment of obesity based on energy restriction.

The first aim of the present study was to determine whether trans-10, cis-12-CLA increases the reduction of body fat induced by an energy restriction in hamsters. A second objective, focused on lipolytic pathways, consisted of the analysis of the effects of this CLA isomer on lipolysis stimulated at different levels of the lipolytic cascade, as well as on the expression of two lipases present in adipose tissue, hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) and adipose tissue TAG lipase (ATGL).

Experimental methods

Animals, diets and experimental design

The experiment was conducted with twenty-four male Syrian Golden hamsters (age 9 weeks; initial body weight 82·6 ± 1·4 g) purchased from Harlan Ibérica (Barcelona, Spain) and took place in accordance with the Institution's guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Animals were individually housed in polycarbonate metabolism cages (Techniplast Gazzada, Guguggiate, Italy) and placed in an air-conditioned room (22 ± 2°C) with a 12 h light–dark cycle. In order to increase body fat content in animals, after a 6 d adaptation period, they were fed ad libitum a semi-purified high-fat diet for 7 weeks. This diet consisted of (g/kg): casein, 200 (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA); l-methionine, 4 (Sigma); wheat starch, 220 (Vencasser, Bilbao, Spain); sucrose, 320 (local markets); palm oil, 150 (Agra-Unilever, Leioa, Spain); sunflower-seed oil, 5 (local markets); cellulose, 46 (Vencasser); choline–HCl, 4 (Sigma). Vitamin (11 g/kg) and mineral (40 g/kg) mixes were formulated according to AIN-93 guidelines(Reference Reeves, Nielsen and Fahey12) and supplied by ICN Pharmaceuticals (Costa Mesa, CA, USA). Palm oil was used because it has been shown that saturated fats lead to greater body fat accumulation than unsaturated ones(Reference Wang, Storlien and Huang13Reference Buettner, Parhofer, Woenckhaus, Wrede, Kunz-Schughart, Schölmerich and Bollheimer15).

After this experimental period, the hamsters (128·7 ± 2·3 g) were divided into three weight-matched groups of eight animals each. Two groups were submitted to energy restriction and fed a semi-purified standard diet: a restricted group fed a control diet (RC) and a restricted group fed a CLA-supplemented diet (RCLA). To calculate the appropriate quantity of diet to be offered to these restricted groups, the third weight-matched group (reference group), fed the same semi-purified standard diet, was used only in order to know the spontaneous food intake. A 25 % reduction was applied to the mean food intake of this group. The semi-purified standard diet consisted of (g/kg): casein, 200; l-methionine, 4; wheat starch, 390; sucrose, 235; sunflower-seed oil, 70; cellulose, 46; choline–HCl, 4; vitamin mix, 11; mineral mix, 40. The diet provided to the RC group was supplemented with linoleic acid at 5 g/kg (supplied by sunflower-seed oil) and that provided to the RCLA group with trans-10, cis-12-CLA at 5 g/kg (Natural Lipids Ltd, Hovdebygda, Norway). Sunflower-seed oil was used as the fat source instead of palm oil in order to obtain a balanced fatty acid profile.

All the experimental diets were freshly prepared once per week, gassed with N2, and stored at 0–4°C to avoid rancidity. Body weight was measured daily.

At the end of the experimental period the hamsters from the RC and RCLA groups were killed under anaesthesia (chloral hydrate) by exsanguination. Adipose tissue from abdominal subcutaneous, perirenal and epididymal locations were dissected and weighed, then immediately frozen. Serum was obtained from blood samples after centrifugation (1000 g for 10 min at 4°C). All samples were stored at − 80°C until analysis.

Serum measurements

Serum NEFA concentration was determined by using a commercial kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).

Adipocyte isolation and lipolysis

Isolated fat cells were obtained from epididymal adipose tissue by collagenase digestion (1·5 mg/ml; 37°C) in Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer, containing bovine serum albumin (3·5 g/100 ml) and 5 mm-glucose at pH 7·4 (KRBA), under continuous vigorous shaking (90 cycles/min) according to the Rodbell method(Reference Rodbell16). Adipocytes were filtered through nylon mesh and washed three times with the same incubation buffer (KRBA) to eliminate the stroma-vascular fraction and collagenase. Measurements of lipolytic activity were performed by incubating isolated adipocytes in 200 μl KRBA buffer with continuous gentle shaking (30 cycles/min), at 37°C with several drugs acting at different levels of the lipolytic cascade: (1) at the β-adrenoceptors (isoproterenol (ISO; 10− 5 m)); (2) at the adenylate cyclase (forskolin (10− 5 m)); (3) at the phosphodiesterase (isobutylmethylxanthine (10− 4 m)); (4) at the protein kinase A (dibutyryl-cAMP (10− 3 m)); (5) at adenosine release (adenosine deaminase (0·2 units/ml)); or without drugs (basal lipolysis), for 90 min. In all cases, the reaction was stopped with an ice bath and a sample (200 μl) was taken for enzymic determination(Reference Wieland17) of glycerol released in the incubation buffer, which was used as the index of fat cell lipolysis. Total lipids were determined gravimetrically after their extraction, according to the method of Dole & Meinertz(Reference Dole and Meinertz18). Results were expressed as μmol glycerol released by 100 mg lipids in 90 min.

Lipolytic drugs were supplied by Sigma (St Louis, MO, USA), and NAD+, ATP, glycerol kinase, glycerol-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase and collagenase A by Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany).

Determination of adipocyte size and number

Adipocyte diameters were determined by direct microscopy (Olympus BX50F; Olympus Optical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) using a 50 μl sample of each isolated fat cell suspension. Cells (200 in each sample) with diameters from 20 to 240 μm were counted(Reference Di Girolamo, Mendlinger and Fertig19).

The total number of fat cells in adipose tissue was obtained by dividing the total lipid content of the tissue by the average lipid content of the fat cells. This value is derived by the mean cell volume (calculated from the diameter) × density of lipid(Reference Di Girolamo, Mendlinger and Fertig19).

Extraction and analysis of RNA and quantification by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was isolated from 100 mg of epididymal adipose tissue using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA samples were then treated with a DNA-free kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to remove any contamination with genomic DNA. The yield and quality of the RNA were assessed by measuring absorbance at 260, 270, 280 and 310 nm and by electrophoresis on 1·3 % agarose gels. Of the total RNA of each sample, 1·5 μg was reverse-transcribed to first-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) using an iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Relative HSL and ATGL mRNA levels were quantified using real-time PCR with an iCycler™–MyiQ™ Real-time PCR Detection System (BioRad). β-Actin mRNA levels were similarly measured and served as the reference gene. Of each cDNA, 0·1 μl were added to PCR reagent mixture, SYBR® Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), with the upstream and downstream primers (900 nm each for HSL and 300 nm for ATGL). Specific primers were synthesised commercially (Tib Molbiol, Berlin, Germany), and the sequences were:

  • HSL: 5′-GGT GAC ACT CGC AGA AGA CAA TA-3′ (forward), 5′-GCC GCC GTG CTG TCT CT-3′ (reverse);

  • ATGL: 5′-CAC TTT AGC TCC AAG GAT GA-3′ (forward), 5′-TGG TTC AGT AGG CCA TTC CT-3′ (reverse);

  • β-Actin: 5′-ACG AGG CCC AGA GCA AGA G-3′ (forward), 5′-GGT GTG GTG CCA GAT CTT CTC-3′ (reverse).

The PCR parameters were as follows: initial 2 min at 50°C, denaturation at 95°C for 10 min followed by forty cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for HSL and 63·5°C for ATGL for 15 s and extension at 60°C for 30 s. All sample mRNA levels were normalised to the values of β-actin and the results expressed as -fold changes of threshold cycle (Ct) value relative to controls using the 2− ΔΔCt method(Reference Livak and Schmittgen20).

Statistical analysis

Results are presented as mean values with their standard errors. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Repeated measures of ANOVA statistical analysis was applied to analyse body weight loss time courses and Student's t test to the rest of measurements. Statistical significance was set-up at the P < 0·05 level.

Results

Body weight and adipose tissue size

No differences in body weight loss were found between both experimental groups throughout the experimental period (Fig. 1). Adipose depot sizes (epididymal, perirenal and abdominal subcutaneous) showed a tendency to reduced values in the RCLA group but this difference did not reach statistical significance when compared with the RC group (Table 1).

Fig. 1 Body-weight evolution in hamsters fed a high-fat diet for 7 weeks (–○–) and then 25 % restricted diets supplemented (–○–) or not (–●–; control diet) with trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid for 3 weeks. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars.

Table 1 Final body weight, adipose tissue weights and epididymal adipocyte size and number of hamsters fed the restricted diets for 3 weeks

(Mean values with their standard errors for eight hamsters per group)

RC, restricted group fed a control diet; RCLA, restricted group fed a conjugated linoleic acid-supplemented diet.

Serum measurements

Hamsters in both experimental groups showed similar values of serum NEFA (0·32 (sem 0·01) nmol/l in the RC group and 0·28 (sem 0·02) nmol/l in the RCLA group).

Adipocyte size and number

Microscopy revealed no significant differences in medium mature adipocyte diameter. A tendency to a reduced number of adipocytes was observed in hamsters fed the trans-10, cis-12-CLA ( − 26·6 %), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (Table 1).

Lipolytic activity and lipase expression

There were no differences in epididymal adipocyte basal lipolysis between the experimental groups or in lipolysis induced by lipolytic drugs acting at different levels of the lipolytic cascade (Table 2). Due to the fact that no significant differences were found in adipocyte size, lipolysis results are expressed as μmol glycerol/100 mg lipids per 90 min. The results are similar when expressed as μmol glycerol/106 cells per 90 min (data not shown).

Table 2 Epididymal adipose tissue lipolysis of hamsters fed the restricted diets for 3 weeks*

(Mean values with their standard errors for eight hamsters per group)

RC, restricted group fed a control diet; RCLA, restricted group fed a conjugated linoleic acid-supplemented diet; IBMX, isobutylmethylxanthine; dAMPc, dibutyryl-cAMP; ADA, adenosine deaminase.

* Results are expressed as μmol glycerol/100 mg lipids per 90 min.

When comparing the expression of HSL between the experimental groups, a tendency towards increased values was found in the RCLA group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 2 (a)). With regard to ATGL, similar mRNA levels were observed in both experimental groups (Fig. 2 (b)).

Fig. 2 Relative mRNA levels of hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) (a) and adipose tissue TAG lipase (ATGL) (b) in epididymal adipose tissue from hamsters fed on the restricted diets for 3 weeks. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. RC, restricted group fed a control diet; RCLA, restricted group fed a conjugated linoleic acid-supplemented diet.

Discussion

As described in the introduction section, numerous studies performed on experimental animals have clearly demonstrated that the trans-10, cis-12 isomer of CLA reduces adiposity by decreasing fat deposition(Reference Kelley and Erickson1Reference Navarro, Fernandez-Quintela, Churruca and Portillo4). In contrast, very little evidence exists concerning the effects of CLA on body fat reduction induced by energy restriction.

Stangl(Reference Stangl6) carried out a study in young male rats fed a 30 % energy-restricted diet, supplemented or not with a CLA mixture (3 %) for 18 d. As a result of CLA feeding body fat loss was significantly increased. With regard to human subjects, a study has been performed with premenopausal women during a 12-week period of moderate energy restriction(Reference Diaz, Watkins, Li, Anderson and Campbell7). No differences in body weight or body fat losses were observed between the placebo group and the CLA-treated group.

In the present study, after a period of fattening feeding, hamsters were subjected to a mild energy restriction (25 %) for 3 weeks that led to a loss of 18·6 g in the RC group and 20·8 g in the RCLA group. No significant differences were found in body-weight loss between both experimental groups, and this situation persisted throughout the whole experimental period. This indicates that, although a CLA effect in a longer experimental period could not be discarded, in a 3-week or shorter restriction period trans-10, cis-12-CLA does not seem to be useful in increasing body-weight reduction. In good accordance with these results concerning body-weight loss, adipose tissue sizes in different anatomical locations were not different in CLA-fed hamsters from those in the controls, showing that CLA did not modify body fat reduction.

The discrepancy between these results and those published by Stangl(Reference Stangl6) could be explained by the difference in the CLA dose used. Thus, whereas Stangl chose a 3 % CLA mixture (approximately 1·5 % trans-10, cis-12-CLA), in the present study 0·5 % trans-10, cis-12-CLA was selected; that is, a three-fold lower dose.

Further studies are warranted to gain a better understanding of the effects of CLA under energy-restriction conditions in other species. Nevertheless, taking into account that the young hamster has shown itself to be an experimental model having a good sensitivity to CLA under ad libitum feeding conditions(Reference De Deckere, van Amelsvoort, McNeill and Jones21Reference Zabala, Churruca, Macarulla, Rodríguez, Fernández-Quintela, Martínez and Portillo23) and considering that the dose of 0·5 % is higher than that used in human studies(Reference Navarro, Fernandez-Quintela, Churruca and Portillo4), it does not seem likely that a significant effect of CLA on lipid reduction induced by energy restriction in humans will be found, as they show a very moderate sensitivity to CLA.

White adipose tissue TAG is the major energy reserve in the body. During times of energy deprivation, white adipose tissue undergoes a shift to greater net rates of lipolysis, and TAG are rapidly mobilised, releasing NEFA that are oxidised to meet the energy requirement of the organism(Reference Duncan24).

Thus, because lipolysis is one of the metabolic pathways activated during energy restriction we were interested in the analysis of potential changes induced by trans-10, cis-12-CLA in this metabolic pathway. Data in the literature concerning the effects of CLA on lipolysis are scarce and controversial, and refer to studies that have not been performed under energy-restriction conditions(Reference Park, Albright, Liu, Storkson, Cook and Pariza8Reference Simon, Macarulla, Fernandez-Quintela, Rodriguez and Portillo11).

The results obtained in the present study show that the β-adrenergic lipolytic cascade was not a target for trans-10, cis-12-CLA. It did not modify lipolysis induced by forskolin, which directly stimulates adenylate cyclase without the participation of β-adrenergic receptor nor the Gs protein. Furthermore, the lack of effect on dibutyryl-cAMP-mediated lipolysis suggests that CLA does not interfere at the protein kinase A level and the lack of changes in lipolysis induced by isobutylmethylxantine indicates no effects of CLA on phosphodiesterase, the enzyme that catabolyses cAMP. Finally, taking into account that the lipolytic cascade was not modified downstream of the membrane receptors, the absence of an effect on isoproterenol-induced lipolysis suggests that changes in β-adrenergic receptors are also discarded.

Adenosine deaminase is a drug that increases glycerol release by avoiding the antilipolytic action produced by the adenosine physiologically released by adipocytes. Thus, the lack of effect of trans-10, cis-12-CLA on adenosine deaminase-stimulated lipolysis shows that it does not modify adipocyte adenosine/A1 receptor-protein Gi signalling pathway.

The results concerning glycerol release stimulation are in good accordance with the lack of change in HSL expression after trans-10, cis-12-CLA feeding, and as a whole these data suggest that this CLA isomer does not modify adipose tissue lipid mobilisation.

Until recently, the hydrolysis of TAG in white adipose tissue was thought to be catalysed exclusively by the enzyme HSL. However, recent studies showing that adipocytes from HSL knockout mice retain a marked basal and adrenergically stimulated lipolysis demonstrated that HSL is not the sole lipase involved in TAG catabolism(Reference Fortier, Wang, Mauriège, Semache, Mfuma, Li, Levy, Richard and Mitchell25Reference Okazaki, Osuga and Tamura27). Three independent groups have discovered a new lipase termed ATGL, desnutrin or Ca-independent phospholipase A2/lipase(Reference Zimmermann, Strauss and Haemmerle28Reference Jenkins, Mancuso, Yan, Sims, Gibson and Gross30). ATGL acts as an additional rate-limiting lipase, catalysing the initial step of the breakdown of TAG(Reference Ye, Dzamko, Cleasby, Hegarty, Furler, Cooney and Kraegen31). This enzyme, unlike HSL, is not regulated by protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation.

In order to gain a better understanding of the action of CLA on adipose tissue lipolysis, we analysed its effect on ATGL expression in epididymal adipose tissue. No significant differences were found in ATGL expression when comparing both experimental groups. These results show that trans-10, cis-12-CLA seems not to affect this new lipolytic pathway.

In conclusion, taking these results as a whole, it was shown that trans-10, cis-12-CLA does not promote adipose tissue lipid mobilisation nor heighten body fat reduction induced by energy restriction. Consequently, this CLA isomer seems not to be a useful tool for inclusion in body weight loss strategies followed during obesity treatment.

Acknowledgements

The present study was supported by grants from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (AGL2005-02494), Gobierno Vasco (IT-265-07 and CTP R05/01), University of País Vasco (GIU06/82) and CYTED 208RT0343. A. L. is a recipient of a doctoral fellowship from the University of País Vasco. Palm oil was a generous gift from Agra-Unilever Foods España S.A. (Leioa, Spain). No conflicts of interest were reported by any of the authors. The contributions of each author were as follows: A. L. and E. S. performed measurements of lipolysis and carried out adipocyte isolation; I. C. and A. F. Q. performed RNA quantification by real-time RT-PCR; V. M. R. carried out the bibliography revision; M. P. P. supervised the results and manuscript writing.

References

1Kelley, DS & Erickson, KL (2003) Modulation of body composition and immune cell functions by conjugated linoleic acid in humans and animal models: benefits vs. risks. Lipids 38, 377386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Wang, YW & Jones, PJ (2004) Conjugated linoleic acid and obesity control: efficacy and mechanisms. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 941955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Domeneghini, C, Di Giancamillo, A & Corino, C (2006) Conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) and white adipose tissue: how both in vitro and in vivo studies tell the story of a relationship. Histol Histopathol 21, 663672.Google ScholarPubMed
4Navarro, V, Fernandez-Quintela, A, Churruca, I & Portillo, MP (2006) The body fat-lowering effect of conjugated linoleic acid: a comparison between animal and human studies. J Physiol Biochem 62, 137147.Google Scholar
5Park, Y, Albright, KJ, Storkson, JM, Liu, W & Pariza, MW (2007) Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) prevents body fat accumulation and weight gain in an animal model. J Food Sci 72, S612S617.Google Scholar
6Stangl, GI (2000) High dietary levels of a conjugated linoleic acid mixture alter hepatic glycerophospholipid class profile and cholesterol-carrying serum lipoproteins of rats. J Nutr Biochem 11, 184191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Diaz, ML, Watkins, BA, Li, Y, Anderson, RA & Campbell, WW (2007) Chromium picolinate and conjugated linoleic acid do not synergistically influence diet- and exercise-induced changes in body composition and health indexes in overweight women. J Nutr Biochem 19, 6168.Google Scholar
8Park, Y, Albright, KJ, Liu, W, Storkson, JM, Cook, ME & Pariza, MW (1997) Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition in mice. Lipids 32, 853858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Evans, M, Brown, J & McIntosh, M (2002) Isomer-specific effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) on adiposity and lipid metabolism. J Nutr Biochem 13, 508516.Google Scholar
10Xu, X, Storkson, J, Kim, S, Sugimoto, K, Park, Y & Pariza, MW (2003) Short-term intake of conjugated linoleic acid inhibits lipoprotein lipase and glucose metabolism but does not enhance lipolysis in mouse adipose tissue. J Nutr 133, 663667.Google Scholar
11Simon, E, Macarulla, MT, Fernandez-Quintela, A, Rodriguez, VM & Portillo, MP (2005) Body fat-lowering effect of conjugated linoleic acid is not due to increased lipolysis. J Physiol Biochem 61, 363369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Reeves, PG, Nielsen, FH & Fahey, GC Jr (1993) AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc writing committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 123, 19391951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Wang, H, Storlien, L & Huang, X (2002) Effects of dietary fat types on body fatness, leptin and ARC leptin receptor, NPY, and AgRP mRNA expression. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282, E1352E1359.Google Scholar
14Wang, H, Storlien, L & Huang, X (1999) Influence of dietary fats on c-Fos-like immunoreactivity in mouse hypothalamus. Brain Res 843, 184192.Google Scholar
15Buettner, R, Parhofer, K, Woenckhaus, M, Wrede, C, Kunz-Schughart, L, Schölmerich, J & Bollheimer, LC (2006) Defining high-fat-diet rat models: metabolic and molecular effects of different fat types. J Mol Endocrinol 36, 485501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Rodbell, M (1964) Metabolism of isolated fat cells. I. Effects of hormones on glucose metabolism and lipolysis. J Biol Chem 239, 375380.Google Scholar
17Wieland, O (1957) Enzymic method for the determination of glycerin (article in German). Biochem Z 329, 313319.Google Scholar
18Dole, V & Meinertz, H (1960) Microdetermination of long-chain fatty acids in plasma and tissues. J Biol Chem 235, 25952599.Google Scholar
19Di Girolamo, M, Mendlinger, S & Fertig, J (1971) A simple method to determine fat cell size and number in four mammalian species. Am J Physiol 221, 850858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Livak, K & Schmittgen, T (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCt method. Methods 25, 402408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21De Deckere, E, van Amelsvoort, J, McNeill, G & Jones, P (1999) Effects of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers on lipid levels and peroxisome proliferation in the hamster. Br J Nutr 82, 309317.Google Scholar
22Navarro, V, Zabala, A, Macarulla, M, Fernández-Quintela, A, Rodríguez, V, Simón, E & Portillo, MP (2003) Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on body fat accumulation and serum lipids in hamsters fed an atherogenic diet. J Physiol Biochem 59, 193199.Google Scholar
23Zabala, A, Churruca, I, Macarulla, M, Rodríguez, V, Fernández-Quintela, A, Martínez, J & Portillo, MP (2004) The trans-10, cis-12 isomer of conjugated linoleic acid reduces hepatic triacylglycerol content without affecting lipogenic enzymes in hamsters. Br J Nutr 92, 383389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Duncan, R (2007) Designing polymer conjugates as lysosomotropic nanomedicines. Biochem Soc Trans 35, 5660.Google Scholar
25Fortier, M, Wang, S, Mauriège, P, Semache, M, Mfuma, L, Li, H, Levy, E, Richard, D & Mitchell, GA (2004) Hormone-sensitive lipase-independent adipocyte lipolysis during β-adrenergic stimulation, fasting, and dietary fat loading. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287, E282E288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Haemmerle, G, Zimmermann, R, Strauss, J, Kratky, D, Riederer, M, Knipping, G & Zechner, R (2002) Hormone-sensitive lipase deficiency in mice changes the plasma lipid profile by affecting the tissue-specific expression pattern of lipoprotein lipase in adipose tissue and muscle. J Biol Chem 277, 1294612952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Okazaki, H, Osuga, J, Tamura, Y, et al. (2002) Lipolysis in the absence of hormone-sensitive lipase: evidence for a common mechanism regulating distinct lipases. Diabetes 51, 33683375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28Zimmermann, R, Strauss, J, Haemmerle, G, et al. (2004) Fat mobilization in adipose tissue is promoted by adipose triglyceride lipase. Science 306, 13831386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Villena, J, Roy, S, Sarkadi-Nagy, E, Kim, K & Sul, H (2004) Desnutrin, an adipocyte gene encoding a novel patatin domain-containing protein, is induced by fasting and glucocorticoids: ectopic expression of desnutrin increases triglyceride hydrolysis. J Biol Chem 279, 4706647075.Google Scholar
30Jenkins, C, Mancuso, D, Yan, W, Sims, H, Gibson, B & Gross, R (2004) Identification, cloning, expression, and purification of three novel human calcium-independent phospholipase A2 family members possessing triacylglycerol lipase and acylglycerol transacylase activities. J Biol Chem 279, 4896848975.Google Scholar
31Ye, J, Dzamko, N, Cleasby, M, Hegarty, B, Furler, S, Cooney, G & Kraegen, EW (2004) Direct demonstration of lipid sequestration as a mechanism by which rosiglitazone prevents fatty-acid-induced insulin resistance in the rat: comparison with metformin. Diabetologia 47, 13061313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Body-weight evolution in hamsters fed a high-fat diet for 7 weeks (–○–) and then 25 % restricted diets supplemented (–○–) or not (–●–; control diet) with trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid for 3 weeks. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars.

Figure 1

Table 1 Final body weight, adipose tissue weights and epididymal adipocyte size and number of hamsters fed the restricted diets for 3 weeks(Mean values with their standard errors for eight hamsters per group)

Figure 2

Table 2 Epididymal adipose tissue lipolysis of hamsters fed the restricted diets for 3 weeks*(Mean values with their standard errors for eight hamsters per group)

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Relative mRNA levels of hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL) (a) and adipose tissue TAG lipase (ATGL) (b) in epididymal adipose tissue from hamsters fed on the restricted diets for 3 weeks. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. RC, restricted group fed a control diet; RCLA, restricted group fed a conjugated linoleic acid-supplemented diet.