Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T10:01:38.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Navigating the protein transition: why dairy and its matrix matter amid rising plant protein trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2025

Oliver C. Witard*
Affiliation:
Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
Asli Devrim-Lanpir
Affiliation:
School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
Michelle C. McKinley
Affiliation:
Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University, Belfast, UK
D. Ian Givens
Affiliation:
Institute for Food, Nutrition and Health, University of Reading, Reading, UK
*
Corresponding author: Oliver C. Witard; Email: oliver.witard@kcl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The concept of the protein transition represents a shift from a diet rich in animal proteins to one richer in plant-based alternatives, largely in response to environmental sustainability concerns. However, a simple swap by replacing dairy protein with plant protein will lead to lower protein quality and a lower intake of key micronutrients that sit naturally within the dairy matrix. Owing to antagonistic effects within the plant food matrix, micronutrients in plant sources exhibit lower bioavailability which is not reflected in food composition data or dietary guidelines. The dairy matrix effect includes moderation of blood lipid levels in which calcium plays a key role. Protein recommendations often take a muscle-centric approach. Hence, strategies to increase the anabolic potential of plant proteins have focused on increasing total protein intake to counter the suboptimal amino acid composition relative to dairy protein or leucine fortification. However, emerging evidence indicates a role for nutrient interactions and non-nutrient components (milk exosomes, bioactive peptides) of the dairy matrix in modulating postprandial muscle protein synthesis rates. To ensure the food system transformation is environmentally sustainable and optimal from a nutrition perspective, consideration needs to be given to complementary benefits of different food matrices and the holistic evaluation of foods in the protein transition. This narrative review critically examines the role of dairy in the protein transition, emphasising the importance of the food matrix in nutrient bioavailability and muscle health. By considering both nutritional and sustainability perspectives, we provide a holistic evaluation of dairy’s contribution within evolving dietary patterns.

Information

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic diagram into the proposed role of dairy in the protein transition, illustrating how the food matrix influences dairy-related health outcomes, nutrient bioavailability and muscle health. MPS, muscle protein synthesis.

Figure 1

Table 1. Typical variability of energy and nutrient concentrations in typical dairy foods (from Ref.(15))

Figure 2

Table 2. Effect of replacing protein in milk with that from faba bean flour on micronutrient and dietary fibre supply

Figure 3

Table 3. The extent of suboptimal intakes of micronutrients in three sections of the UK population (derived from Ref.(14))

Figure 4

Figure 2. Contribution of five plant-based foods and four plant-based drinks and skimmed cow’s milk to the recommended nutrient intake (RNI) for calcium based on gross and bioaccessible calcium supplies per serving. For example, tofu provides a significantly (P < 0·05) greater supply of calcium than skimmed milk, yet the milk provides significantly (P < 0·05) more bioaccessible calcium than the tofu. A similar situation is observed whereby the almond drink provides more total calcium than the other products, yet the skimmed milk provides the most bioaccessible calcium. The term bioaccessibility refers to the relative ease with which a nutrient is released from the food matrix during digestion. High ease (high bioaccessibility) indicates that more of the nutrient is likely to be absorbed than if it had a low bioaccessibility. Different letters above pillars indicate a significant difference (P < 0·05). © 2024. Muleya, M., E. F. Bailey and E. H. Bailey. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 5

Table 4. Faecal excretions resulting from the four dairy dietary treatments (derived from Ref. (65))

Figure 6

Figure 3. Relationship between the proportion of calcium soaps at the end of digestion and calcium to lipid composition ratio for liquid (milk), semi-solid (yoghurt) and solid (cheese) dairy matrices. The cheese was made from homogenised (H) and non-homogenised (NH) milk at pH values of 5·5 and 6·5. NH milk was treated at 65 °C, H milk was treated at 65 °C and 95 °C. The figure illustrates that more calcium soaps are produced from the solid cheese matrix than the liquid or semi-solid matrices and that cheese produced at pH 6·5 has soap formation greater than when produced at pH 5·5. © 2017. Lamothe, S., N. Rémillard, J. Tremblay, and M. Britten. All rights reserved. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.

Figure 7

Figure 4. Nutrient and non-nutrient components of the dairy matrix implicated in the postprandial regulation of muscle protein synthesis. The schematic illustrates the proposed interaction of nutrient components (left circle) and non-nutrient components (right circle) within the dairy matrix in modulating muscle protein synthesis rates. Nutrient components include proteins (casein and whey), bioactive peptides, lipids, carbohydrates (lactose), vitamins (for example, A, B12) and minerals (for example, calcium, phosphorus). Non-nutrient components encompass factors such as physical form (solid, liquid, gel), preparation methods (heating, glycation, cooking), processing (fermentation), production strategies (for example, vitamin D fortification) and extracellular vesicles (milk exosomes and endogenously released microRNAs). Created with BioRender.com.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Proposed mechanisms underpinning the potential role of milk exosomes in the postprandial regulation of muscle protein synthesis. Overview of how milk exosomes may contribute to the postprandial regulation of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) by delivering microRNAs (miRNAs) into muscle cells. The central panel highlights key miRNAs (miR-29b, miR-148a, miR-21 and miR-155) identified in bovine milk exosomes that are linked to pathways that modulate MPS. Each miRNA is proposed to modulate various intracellular signalling cascades (for example, mTORC1, PI3K/Akt, MEK/ERK), potentially enhancing muscle growth by regulating targets such as AMPK, RASA1 and PDCD4. The schematic also shows C2C12 myotubes (in vitro model) where additional miRNAs (miR-149-3p, miR-2881) and translation factors (eIF4A, MRP proteins) can stimulate muscle growth via non-mTOR-dependent mechanisms. On the right, findings from in vivo rodent studies are summarised, including C57BL/6 young mice (exhibiting greater grip strength and muscle gains) and Fisher 344 rats (showing muscle growth). Created with BioRender.com.