Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-5bvrz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T12:03:00.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrigia vitta (Dujardin, 1845), the neglected helminth of European rodents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2025

Jerzy M. Behnke*
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK
Neil J. Morley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Surrey, UK
Joseph A. Jackson
Affiliation:
School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, UK
*
Corresponding author: Jerzy M. Behnke; Email: jerzy.behnke@nottingham.ac.uk

Abstract

The digenean trematode, Corrigia vitta, is a frequently reported component species in studies of helminth communities of wild rodents in Europe, especially those of wood mice and bank voles. It has been known since Dujardin first described the species in 1845, and yet its life cycle is still poorly defined, although Dicrocoeliidae typically have at least 3 hosts in their life cycles. Here, we review the history of nomenclature changes of the species, morphological studies, definitive mammalian host species range and evidence for the identity of intermediate hosts. We also review the epidemiology of C. vitta, searching for commonalities between studies that have assessed the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic variables on both prevalence and abundance of the species in wood mice. Furthermore, we identify gaps in knowledge and propose key objectives for future work on the species. We emphasize that if the life cycle of C. vitta could be established in the laboratory and maintained in laboratory mice, as a hepatopancreatic specialist in its definitive host, the parasite may turn out to be the source of novel medicines for the treatment of human pancreatic/liver diseases.

Information

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Corrigia vitta, adult worms. A. Complete worm extracted from the bile duct of a wood mouse from Surrey (labels are as follows: OS, oral or anterior sucker; VS, ventral sucker; T1, anterior testis; T2, posterior testis; Ov, ovary; Vit, vitelline glands; Ut + eggs, uterus containing eggs). B. Transverse section through a pancreatic duct showing 5 worms lying alongside one another. C. Whole mount drawn by camera lucida under 42 mm. Objective and ×10 ocular lenses. Image copied from Harvey and Channon (1956). A and B are images taken from microscope slides in the collection of the late Prof John W. Lewis, held at the Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London (with permission of his family). A was stained with borax carmine stain and B with haematoxylin and eosin stain. Scale bars in A and B, 0·5 mm, and in C, 2·0 mm.

Figure 1

Table 1. Selected studies of the occurrence of Corrigia vitta in wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus), yellow-necked mouse (A. flavicollis) and Ural mouse (A. uralensis) populations

Figure 2

Figure 2. Eggs of Corrigia vitta. A. Egg stained by haematoxylin and eosin stain. B. Unstained egg. C. Compressed posterior section of an adult worm, with released eggs. A and B are images taken from microscope slides in the collection of the late Prof John W. Lewis, held at the Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London (with permission of his family). Scale bars in A and B are 5 μm.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Updated phylogenetic analysis of dicrocoeliid trematodes based on 18S rDNA, showing the position of Corrigia vitta, employing longer sequences (>1400 bp) currently available in GenBank (see Ribas et al. 2012, for previous analysis). Where more than 1 long sequence was available for a nominal species, a single arbitrarily selected sequence was included per species. Sequences for members of other plagiorchiid families are included as outgroups. Analysis was carried out via the Maximum Likelihood method (following Ribas et al. 2012) in MEGA11 (Tamura et al. 2021), employing a general time reversible model (Nei and Kumar 2000) with invariant sites. Initial trees were obtained via the BioNJ method applied to pairwise distances estimated by Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL). The inferred tree (log likelihood −3286) is shown with evolutionary distances indicated via the scale (substitutions per site). Bootstrap support (Felsenstein 1985) for clusters is indicated where this is greater than 70% (based on 1000 replicates). The analysis was based on 1434 base positions, excluding all positions with gaps or missing data.

Figure 4

Table 2. Selected studies of the occurrence of Corrigia vitta in bank and grey-sided vole populations

Figure 5

Table 3. Records of C. vitta in wood mice, bank voles and other hosts or in which few additional details were given

Figure 6

Table 4. Selected studies of helminths in rodent populations, with no record of C. vitta

Figure 7

Figure 4. Prevalence of C. vitta in adult wood mice in Surrey in the period from August 1975 until February 1978 (inclusive, and both sexes combined). Prevalence is based on faecal C. vitta egg counts of mice trapped in the months shown, and released after inspection. The mice were not marked individually; therefore, the data probably include repeated assessments of certain individuals. The number of animals sampled in each month from January to December was as follows: 45, 53, 36, 39, 28, 59, 51, 48, 59, 66; 56, 21. (Unpublished data of J. W. Lewis).

Figure 8

Table 5. Prevalence of Corrigia vitta in wood mice from Surrey in the period from August 1975 until February 1978, inclusive, based on faecal egg counts (Unpublished data of J. W. Lewis)