Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T10:14:43.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Leishmania donovani development in Phlebotomus argentipes: comparison of promastigote- and amastigote-initiated infections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2016

JOVANA SADLOVA*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
JITKA MYSKOVA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
TEREZA LESTINOVA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
JAN VOTYPKA
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
MATTHEW YEO
Affiliation:
Department of Pathogen Molecular Biology, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HTLondon, UK
PETR VOLF
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Vinicna 7, 128 44 Prague 2, Czech Republic. E-mail: sadlovaj@natur.cuni.cz

Summary

Leishmania parasites alternate in their life cycle between promastigote stages that develop in the gut of phlebotomine sand flies and amastigotes residing inside phagocytic cells of vertebrate hosts. For experimental infections of sand flies, promastigotes are frequently used as this way of infection is technically easier although ingestion of promastigotes by sand flies is unnatural. Here we aimed to answer a critical question, to what extent do promastigote-initiated experimental infections differ from those initiated with intracellular amastigotes. We performed side-by-side comparison of Leishmania development in Phlebotomus argentipes females infected alternatively with promastigotes from log-phase cultures or amastigotes grown ex vivo in macrophages. Early stage infections showed substantial differences in parasite load and representation of morphological forms. The differences disappeared along the maturation of infections; both groups developed heavy late-stage infections with colonization of the stomodeal valve, uniform representation of infective metacyclics and equal efficiency of transmission. The results showed that studies focusing on early phase of Leishmania development in sand flies should be initiated with intracellular amastigotes. However, the use of promastigote stages for sand fly infections does not alter significantly the final outcome of Leishmania donovani development in P. argentipes and their transmissibility to the vertebrate host.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Morphological forms of L. donovani distinguished in this study based on criteria described in the Materials and Methods section. Parasites from midgut smears of infected sand flies were fixed with methanol and stained with Giemsa. (A) Procyclic promastigote; (B) short promastigote; (C) elongated nectomonad; (D) metacyclic promastigote. Scale bar = 10 µm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Infection rates (percent of females infected) and intensities of L. donovani infections in P. argentipes. Parasite load was estimated by fluorescent microscopy: light infections, <100 parasites per gut; moderate infections, 100–500 parasites per gut; heavy infections, >500 parasites per gut. Numbers of dissected females are shown above bars. PRO, promastigote-initiated infections; AMA, amastigote-initiated infections; PBM, post bloodmeal. Differences between groups were evaluated using Chi-square test: day 1 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ2 = 65·737, d.f. = 3; day 2 PBM, P = 0·021, χ2 = 9·743, d.f. = 3; day 4 PBM, P = 0·036, χ2 = 8·518, d.f. = 3; days 8–9 PBM, P = 0·203, χ2 = 1·6202, d.f. = 1.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Morphological forms of L. donovani during development in P. argentipes. The guts of infected females were sampled at 1, 2, 4 and 8–9 days PBM and parasite morphometry was determined as described in methods. The percentage of each form found in infected flies at each time point is shown. PRO, promastigote-initiated infections; AMA, amastigote-initiated infections; PBM, post bloodmeal; PP, procyclic promastigotes; EN, elongated nectomonads; SP, short promastigotes; MP, metacyclic promastigotes. Differences between groups were tested by Chi-square test: day 1 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ2 = 68·115, d.f. = 3, day 2 PBM, P < 0·0001, χ2 = 22·581, d.f. = 3, day 4 PBM, P = 0·058, χ2 = 5·707, d.f. = 2, day 8–9 PBM, P = 0. 034, χ2 = 6·786, d.f. = 2.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Location of L. donovani in infected P. argentipes. AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; SV, stomodeal valve. Differences between groups were evaluated using χ2 test: day 1 PBM, P = 0·134, χ2 = 2·247, d.f. = 1; day 2 PBM, P = 0·436, χ2 = 1·661, d.f. = 2; day 4 PBM, P = 0·616, χ2 = 0·970, d.f. = 2; day 8–9 PBM, P = 0·473, χ2 = 1·497, d.f. = 2.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Images from fluorescent microscope showing amastigote-initiated (A) and promastigote-initiated (B) L. donovani infections in P. argentipes females by day 4 PBM. Parasites (transfected with GFP) are present in both abdominal and thoracic parts of the midgut and the stomodeal valve is colonized. AMG, abdominal midgut; TMG, thoracic midgut; SV, stomodeal valve. Scale bar = 100 µm.

Figure 5

Table 1. Transmission efficiency of Leishmania donovani on BALB/c mice using Phlebotomus argentipes females