Thornicroft's giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti is an isolated subspecies (Dagg, Reference Dagg2014; but see Groves & Grubb, Reference Groves and Grubb2011) found only in the Luangwa Valley, in eastern Zambia. Current information regarding their mitochondrial DNA profile indicates that the Thornicroft's giraffe is more similar to the Masai giraffe G. camelopardalis tippelskirchi than to any of the other subspecies (Fennessy et al., Reference Fennessy, Bock, Tutchings, Brenneman and Janke2013). However, the Masai giraffe is found at least 300 km north of the Thornicroft's giraffe and there are no records of movement between the two populations.

The Luangwa Valley is traversed along a north−south axis by the Luangwa River, a meandering waterway characterized by numerous oxbow lakes, or lagoons, and delineated on the western side by the Muchinga Escarpment. The northern limits of the Thornicroft's giraffe are uncertain but its range extends at least to the confluence of the Chibembe and Luangwa Rivers (c. 12°50′S). Similarly, the southern limit is unknown but reaches the confluence of the Msanzara and Luangwa Rivers (c. 13°45′S). Individuals range primarily along the Luangwa River, usually within 2–3 km, although occasionally up to 7 km away (Berry, Reference Berry1978). Areas further from the Luangwa River are mostly unsuitable, especially the miombo (Brachystegia and Julbernardia) woodland, where the giraffes’ main food plants are scarce or non-existent.

The habitat most favoured by the giraffe is riparian forest containing a number of large tree species that feature prominently in their diet (e.g. Trichilia emetica, Tamarindus indica, Diospyros mespiliformis, Faidherbia albida, Kigelia africana). Other habitats include mopane Colophospermum mopane and munga (Acacia, Combretum, Terminalia) woodland, thickets, scrub brush and open grassland (Astle et al., Reference Astle, Webster and Lawrance1969; Fanshawe, Reference Fanshawe1969; Berry, Reference Berry1973). Giraffes subsist on a varied diet, consuming flowers, leaves, stems and fruits from 93 plant species in the Luangwa Valley (Berry, Reference Berry1973; P.S.M. Berry & F.B. Bercovitch, unpubl. data). In 1938 their core area was given protection with the gazetting of the South and North Luangwa Game Reserves, both of which were designated National Parks in 1972.

In the early 1900s the population was estimated to comprise only 30–70 individuals, mostly ranging on the eastern bank of the Luangwa River in small herds, but the methods used to determine these estimates are unknown and probably reflected the impressions of the early British administrators (Berry, Reference Berry1973). One report of > 500 giraffes in the 1920s appears to be inaccurate, based on subsequent information (Berry, Reference Berry1973). Darling (Reference Darling1960) estimated a population of 200–250 individuals along the eastern bank of the river at c. 13−14°S, although he also recorded a few ‘vagrants’ on the western bank. By the end of the 1960s the range of the Thornicroft's giraffe had expanded in both northerly and southerly directions (Berry, Reference Berry1973). Berry (Reference Berry1973) noted that a few individuals were present on the western bank but most of the population lived on the eastern bank. The greatest north−south distance between sightings of Thornicroft's giraffe was between 11°50′S and 14°18′S, but these were often either lone bulls or small herds. In 1969 Berry (Reference Berry1973) estimated a population size of 270–300, with Dagg & Foster (Reference Dagg and Foster1982) concurring that the maximum population size was c. 300 individuals.

Systematic population surveys were initiated in 1973 by PSMB. Giraffes have distinctive coat patterns that remain unchanged throughout their lifetime and facilitate identification of individuals. Here we present giraffe population trends that cover a 30-year span (1973–2003), as well as results from a follow-up survey in 2013. During 1973−2003 surveys were conducted annually on foot and/or in a vehicle. Each time a giraffe was observed its identity, if known, was recorded, along with location, herd composition, time and activity. As identical methods were used throughout this period, the population counts are comparable across years, although they may not be directly comparable with those at other sites where alternative methods were used. The counts were conducted along both the east and west banks of the Luangwa River but for consistency across years we restrict our analysis to the west bank, as those surveys were undertaken on a more regular basis. In 1994 and 1995 the Luangwa River stopped flowing in some places and giraffes of both sexes and all ages were able to cross dry sections of the river bed from the east to the west bank. This resulted in an influx of new giraffes into the study area. Prior to that time only mature bulls were capable of wading across the Luangwa River.

For purposes of analysis we subdivided the 30-year study into 5-year time blocks. The total number of giraffes counted during each survey year analysed included both recognized and unknown individuals. For each year we calculated the mean number of sightings of known individuals. We then divided the number of counts of unknown individuals by this mean to estimate the total number of unrecognized giraffes observed in the survey area. We added the numbers of identified and unrecognized giraffes to yield a total count. For example, in 1988 we recorded 28 unique individuals on 249 occasions, or a mean of 8.9 observations per individual. The same year we counted unknown giraffes on 92 occasions, which we estimate represented 10 individuals (92/8.9 = 10.3). Combining these numbers yields a total count of 38 giraffes along the 90 km survey. Given that we have no estimate of distance from the survey track to the giraffes, we cannot estimate density and therefore we refer to our values as a giraffe index.

The survey distance was determined by measuring the length of travel during each of the survey years on maps of scale 1 : 50,000 produced by the Department of Surveys of the Republic of Zambia. The maps used in our assessment were 1331 B1 (Manze), 1331 B2 (Mfuwe), 1331 B3 (Lusangazi), 1232 C3 (Chasera) and 1231 D4 (Lion Plain). Figure 1 shows the location of the survey region, the approximate range of the Thornicroft's giraffe and the distance to the closest subspecies of giraffe.

Fig. 1

The area within South Luangwa National Park, Zambia, surveyed for the Thornicroft's giraffe Giraffa camelopardalis thornicrofti, and the presumed range of the subspecies The southern limit of the Masai giraffe G. camelopardalis tippelskirchi, the nearest subspecies, is indicated by the dashed line on the inset.

In September 2013 a more directed and focused systematic count was conducted by PSMB, FBB and colleagues in the South Luangwa National Park. Over a 6-day period, teams of 2–5 trained observers drove along tracks in the Park and recorded the number of giraffes observed, as well as specific coat patterns for recognition of individuals. During a 4-day period (4–7 September 2013) we concentrated on the roads in the vicinity of Mfuwe Lodge. This survey covered 67.9 km and we counted a minimum of 26 individual giraffes, yielding an index of 0.38 km⁻¹. On 10 September 2013 we identified 40 individuals during a systematic survey that covered 75 km of road not in the vicinity of Mfuwe Lodge. This survey yielded a giraffe index of 0.53 km⁻¹. The last count was conducted on 12 September 2013 during a drive of 17.5 km. Seven individuals were sighted during this survey, yielding a giraffe index of 0.40 km⁻¹. Hence, during the 6-day survey the giraffe index was 0.38−0.53 km⁻¹, with a mean of 0.44 km⁻¹.

Figure 2 charts the giraffe index within the Luangwa River Valley during 1973−2003. Because of the relatively small population size, demographic changes have a significant impact on density estimates. The dip in 1983 was probably a result of the deaths of two mature males in August, one of whom was the victim of lion Panthera leo predation. Over the 30-year period the mean giraffe index was 0.51 ± SE 0.10 km⁻¹. Omitting the two unusual years of 1983 and 1998 gives a mean index of 0.48 ± SE 0.04 km⁻¹. The giraffe index in 1973 (0.42 km⁻¹) was essentially the same as in 2013 (0.44 km⁻¹).

Fig. 2

The population trend of the Thornicroft's giraffe in its core range in the Luangwa Valley, Zambia (Fig. 1), during 1973−2003.

With an estimated giraffe index in 2013 of 0.44 km⁻¹ along the Luangwa River, and given an approximate length of 250 km for the Luangwa River between the confluence with the Chibembe River and the confluence with the Msanzara River, we can reasonably assume that at least 110 Thornicroft's giraffes reside in their core area along the tracks near the Luangwa River. Given that giraffes rarely range outside of the alluvial zone or > 3 km from a river (Berry, Reference Berry1978), a maximum of 660 Thornicroft's giraffes can be estimated to live in their core range within the Luangwa River Valley. However, giraffe distribution is not uniform along the river, suggesting that the total population size is probably somewhat less than our estimates. We therefore conclude that the total population is probably 500−600.

The size of the Thornicroft's giraffe population in the Luangwa River Valley has been reasonably stable over the past 40 years. Giraffes are concentrated on the west bank, with changes in population distribution coinciding with the extent of water flow in the Luangwa River. Currently G. camelopardalis is categorized as a species of Least Concern on the IUCN Red List (Fennessy & Brown, Reference Fennessy and Brown2010), although two subspecies (G. camelopardalis peralta and G. camelopardalis rothschildi) are categorized as Endangered (Fennessy & Brown, Reference Fennessy and Brown2008; Fennessy & Brenneman, Reference Fennessy and Brenneman2010). Given that the Thornicroft's giraffe is confined to a single location in a protected area of Zambia, with the total population size estimated to be 600 or fewer, we strongly recommend a reassessment of the conservation status of G. camelopardalis thornicrofti, and urge that conservation monitoring of this distinctive subspecies be implemented for its continued protection.