Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T01:01:39.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular, biochemical characterization and assessment of immunogenic potential of cofactor-independent phosphoglycerate mutase against Leishmania donovani: a step towards exploring novel vaccine candidate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

RATI TANDON
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
SHARAT CHANDRA
Affiliation:
Division of Structural and Molecular Biology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
RAJENDRA KUMAR BAHARIA
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
PRAGYA MISRA
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
SANCHITA DAS
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
KEERTI RAWAT
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
MOHAMMAD IMRAN SIDDIQI
Affiliation:
Division of Structural and Molecular Biology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
SHYAM SUNDAR
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
ANURADHA DUBE*
Affiliation:
Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
*
*Corresponding author: Division of Parasitology, Central Drug Research Institute, Post Box No. 173, Lucknow 226 031, India. E-mail: anuradha_dube@hotmail.com, anuradha_dube@rediffmail.com

Summary

Despite immense efforts, vaccine against visceral leishmaniasis has yet not been developed. Earlier our proteomic study revealed a novel protein, cofactor-independent phoshoglycerate mutase (LdiPGAM), an important enzyme in glucose metabolism, in T helper cells type 1 (Th1) stimulatory region of soluble Leishmania donovani antigen. In this study, LdiPGAM was biochemically and molecularly characterized and evaluated for its immunogenicity and prophylactic efficacy against L. donovani. Immunogenicity of recombinant LdiPGAM (rLdiPGAM) was initially assessed in naïve hamsters immunized with it by analysing mRNA expression of inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) and other Th1/T helper cells type 2 cytokines, which revealed an upregulation of Th1 cytokines along with iNOS. Immunogenicity of rLdiPGAM was further evaluated in lymphocytes of treated Leishmania-infected hamsters and peripheral blood mononuclear cells of Leishmania patients in clinical remission by various parameters, viz. lymphoproliferation assay and NO production (hamsters and patients) and levels of various cytokines (patients). rLdiPGAM induced remarkable Lymphoproliferative response and NO production in treated Leishmania-infected hamsters as well as in patients and increase in interferon gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin-12 (IL-12p40) responses in Leishmania patients in clinical remission. Vaccination with rLdiPGAM exerted considerable prophylactic efficacy (73%) supported by increase in mRNA expression of iNOS, IFN-γ and IL-12p40 with decrease in transforming growth factor beta and interleukin-10. Above results indicate the importance of rLdiPGAM protein as a potential vaccine candidate against visceral leishmaniasis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Sequences of forward and reverse primers of hamster cytokines used for quantitative real time RT–PCR

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Cloning overexpression, purification and raising of antibody against rLdiPGAM (A) Specific PCR of LdiPGAM; lane 1: 1 kb ladder, lanes 2–3: amplified PCR product at 1659 bp. (B) Clone confirmation in pTZ57R/T; lane 1: 1 kb ladder, lane 2: BamHI/EcoRI digested pTZ57R/T + LdiPGAM, lane 3: Undigested plasmid (C) Clone confirmation in pET28a, Lane 1: 1 kb ladder, lane 2: BamHI/EcoRI HI digested pET28a + LdiPGAM, lane 3: Undigested plasmid (D) Expression and purification of rLdiPGAM in E. coli cells; Whole Cell Lysate (WCL) of transformed E. coli separated on 10% acrylamide gel and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Lane 1: WCL before IPTG induction, lane 2: WCL after IPTG (1·0 mm) induction at 37 °C; lanes 3–5 wash fractions and lanes 6–8 eluted protein and lane 9: Molecular weight marker. (E) Western Blot analysis using anti-rLdiPGAM Ab in uninduced WCL, induced WCL and Leishmania WCL and soluble Leishmania antigen (SLD). Lane 1: Molecular weight marker; lane 2: Uninduced E. coli WCL; lane 3: induced E. coli WCL; lane 4: purified rLdiPGAM; lane 5: Leishmania WCL; and lane 6: SLD. (F) Size exclusion chromatographic profile of rLdiPGAM carried using a Sephdex-75 10/300 column (GL column) pre-equilibrated with buffer (50 mm Tris–HCl, pH 7·2, 300 mm NaCl). Single elution peak of rLdiPGAM was observed in chromatographic profile.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Intracellular localization of LdiPGAM and assessment of its expression in different stages of Leishmania cell cycle. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of the intracellular distribution of LdiPGAM in L. donovani promastigotes: (i) merged image of all fields; (ii) kinetoplast labelling with mitotracker dye; (iii) immunolocalization image of LdiPGAM; (iv) cell nucleus and kinetoplastic nucleus labelled with DAPI; (v) differential interference contrast image; (vi) merged image of all fluorescence images. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of hydroxyurea (HU)-treated synchronized cells harvested at different time intervals. (C) (i) Western Blot analysis (10% PAGE) of whole-cell extracts (2 × 107) cell equivalents) at different phases of cell cycle using anti-LdiPGAM antibody (1:1000 dilution); (ii) Bar chart represents mean and s.d. expression of LdiPGAM relative to grp78 in three independent experiments.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Lymphoproliferative and NO response of rLdiPGAM in cured hamsters. (A). Lymphoproliferative response of mononuclear cells of lymph nodes from normal, and L. donovani infected and treated hamsters against recombinant protein/SLD. (B) NO production by peritoneal macrophages, in response to the recombinant protein/SLD stimulation. Results are expressed as means and s.d. for three to four hamsters per group done in triplicate and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. The analysis of the results was done by the one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's post test. Significance values indicate the difference between the SLD and the recombinant proteins stimulation P < 0·05(*), P < 0·01(**) and P < 0·001(***).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Lymphoproliferative, NO and cytokine responses of rLdiPGAM in cured patients/endemic contacts. Lymphoproliferative (A) and NO (B) response of PBMCs from individuals of Cured VL patients and Endemic controls (n = 7 for each group) against the recombinant proteins/SLD stimulation. The results were analysed by the one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's post test. Significance values indicate the difference between the SLD and the recombinant proteins’ stimulation P < 0·05(*), P < 0·01(**) and P < 0·001(***). (C) IL-12P40, IFN-γ and IL-10 level of PBMCs from individuals of cured VL patients and endemic controls against the recombinant proteins/SLD. All measurements were done in triplicate in two independent experiments and the results were comparable.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Analysis of Splenic iNOS and cytokine mRNA expression profile by quantitative RT–PCR in normal and immunized hamsters on day 30 p.i. Results are presented as means and s.d. for five hamsters per group done in triplicate and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. The analysis of the results was done by Student's t test. Significance values indicate the difference between the immunized group and normal group. P < 0·05(*), P < 0·01(**) and P < 0·001(***).

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Survival curve analysis of different experimental groups. Survival data of animals (six hamsters in each group), representative of two independent experiments with similar results was observed up to day 180 p.c.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Body weight, spleen weight and liver weight as well as parasite burden in rLdiPGAM + BCG vaccinated hamsters. Body weight (A), spleen weight (B) and liver weight (C) in g as well as parasite burden (no. of amastigotes per 10 001 cell nuclei) in the spleen (D), liver (E) and bone marrow (F) of hamsters on days 0, 45, 90, 120 and 180 p.c. Results are means and s.d. for three to four hamsters per group done in triplicate and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. The analysis of the results was done by the one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's post test Significance values indicate the difference between infected group and other experimental groups P < 0·05(*), P < 0·01(**) and P < 0·001(***).

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Lymphoproliferatve, NO and antibody responsed in rLdiPGAM vaccinated hamsters. (A, B) LTT response in Con A and rLdiPGAM stimulated lymphocytes of rLdiPGAM + BCG-vaccinated hamsters in comparison with the unimmunized infected hamsters on days 45 and 60 p.c. (C, D) NO production following LPS and rLdiPGAM stimulation in lymphocytes of rLdiPGAM + BCG-vaccinated hamsters in comparison to the unimmunized infected hamsters on days 45 and 60 p.c. (E, F) Leishmanial antigen-specific IgG and its isotypes IgG1 and IgG2 in rLdiPGAM + BCG vaccinated hamsters in comparison with the unimmunized infected hamsters on days 45 and 60 p.c. Data are presented as mean absorbance ± s.d. for three to four hamsters per group in triplicate wells and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. The analysis of the results was done by the one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's post test Significance values indicate the difference between the vaccinated group and infected group P < 0·05(*), P < 0·01(**) and P < 0·001(***).

Figure 9

Fig. 9. Splenic iNOS and cytokine mRNA expression profile analysis of normal and vaccinated hamsters on days 45 and 60 p.c. by the qRT–PCR. Results are means and s.d. for three to four hamsters per group done in triplicate and are representative of two independent experiments with similar results. The results were analysed by the one-way ANOVA test followed by Tukey's post-test. Significance values indicate the difference between the vaccinated group and infected group P < 0·05(*), P < 0·01(**) and P < 0·001(***).

Supplementary material: File

Tandon supplementary material

Tandon supplementary material 1

Download Tandon supplementary material(File)
File 2.3 MB