Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-rv6c5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-04T11:50:32.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and yield performance of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) crop under anthracnose stress in dryland crop-livestock farming system

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2022

Tessema Tesfaye Atumo*
Affiliation:
Agronomy, Southern Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Arba Minch Research Center, P.O. Box 2228, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
Getachew Gudero Mengesha
Affiliation:
Crop Protection, Southern Agricultural Research Institute (SARI), Arba Minch Research Center, P.O. Box 2228, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
*
*Corresponding author. Email: tessema4@gmail.com

Abstract

Dual-purpose sorghum response to anthracnose disease, growth, and yield was undertaken in Derashe and Arba Minch trial sites during March–June 2018 and 2019. Five sorghum varieties and Rara (local check) were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. Variety Chelenko exhibited the tallest main crop plant height (430 cm) while Dishkara was the tallest (196.65 cm) at ratoon crop harvesting. Rara had a higher tiller number (main = 6.73, ratoon = 9.73) among the varieties. Dishkara and Chelenko varieties produced 50 and 10% more dry biomass yield (DBY) than the overall mean DBY, while Konoda produced 40% less. Although the anthracnose infestation was highest on the varieties Konoda (percentage severity index [PSI] = 20.37%) and NTJ_2 (PSI = 32.19%), they produced significantly (p < .001) higher grain yield (3.89 t/ha) than others. Under anthracnose pressure, Chelenko and Dishkara varieties are suggested for dry matter yield while NTJ_2 for grain yield production in the study area and similar agroecology.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Total monthly rainfall and average minimum and maximum temperature during 2018 (a) and 2019 (b) in Arba Minch.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Total monthly rainfall and average minimum and maximum temperature during 2018 (a) and 2019 (b) in Derashe.

Figure 2

Table 1. Growth performance of main crop as influenced by sorghum varieties, experimental years, and locations

Figure 3

Table 2. Dry biomass yield and growth performance of ratoon crop as influenced by sorghum varieties and experimental locations

Figure 4

Figure 3. Length of internodes of main crop as influenced by sorghum varieties.

Figure 5

Table 3. Dry biomass yield of main crop as influenced by sorghum varieties, experimental years, locations, and their interaction

Figure 6

Figure 4. Standard mean value of main crop grain yield as influenced by sorghum varieties.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Total dry biomass yields of sorghum varieties used in the present study.

Figure 8

Table 4. Incidence, severity, and AUDPC of sorghum varieties to Anthracnose at different sites during the 2018 and 2019 main cropping seasons

Figure 9

Table 5. Correlation of dry biomass and grain yield with growth and disease assessment parameters for main cropped sorghum varieties

Figure 10

Table 6. Correlation of dry biomass yield with growth and disease assessment parameters for ratoon cropped sorghum varieties

Reviewing editor:  Michael Nevels University of St Andrews, Biomolecular Sciences Building, Fife, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, KY16 9ST
Minor revisions requested.

Review 1: Growth and yield performance of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) crop under anthracnose stress in dryland crop-livestock farming system

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer delcares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: Authors need to see each comments made within the attached manuscript file (see comments on yellow highlighted tex comment boxes). The writing english sentences needs to be improved.

Presentation

Overall score 4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
4 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
3 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
4 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
3 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
3 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
3 out of 5