Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T05:50:24.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phytic acid improves intestinal mucosal barrier damage and reduces serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines in a 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced rat colorectal cancer model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Cuiping Liu
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Chen Chen
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Fuguo Yang
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Xin Li
Affiliation:
School of Basic Medicine, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Lixue Cheng
Affiliation:
Yantai Hospital of Shandong Wendeng Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Yantai 266400, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
Yang Song*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266021, Shandong, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Y. Song, fax +86 0532 8378 0070, email qdsongyang@126.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Phytic acid (PA) has been demonstrated to have a potent anticarcinogenic activity against colorectal cancer (CRC). Defects of the intestinal mucosal barrier and inflammation processes are involved in the development and progression of CRC. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of PA on the intestinal mucosal barrier and proinflammatory cytokines. After a 1-week acclimatisation period, sixty Wistar male rats were divided into the following five groups, with twelve rats per group: the control group (CG), model group (MG), low-PA-dose group (0·25 g/kg per d), middle-PA-dose group (0·5 g/kg per d), and high-PA-dose group (1 g/kg per d). 1,2-Dimethylhydrazine (DMH) at a dosage of 30 mg/kg of body weight was injected weekly to induce CRC for 18 weeks. We examined the expression of genes related to the intestinal mucosal barrier in the model. The results demonstrated that tumour incidence was decreased following PA treatment. The mRNA and protein expression of mucin 2 (MUC2), trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) and E-cadherin in the MG were significantly lower than those in the CG (P<0·05). The mRNA and protein expression of claudin-1 in the MG were significantly higher than those in the CG (P<0·05). PA elevated the mRNA and protein expression of MUC2, TFF3 and E-cadherin, and diminished the mRNA and protein expression of claudin-1. Furthermore, PA decreased serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines, which included TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6. In conclusion, this study suggests that PA has favourable effects on the intestinal mucosal barrier and may reduce serum proinflammatory cytokine levels.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Authors 2018 
Figure 0

Table 1 Real-time PCR primer sequences used and the sizes of the products obtained

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Changes of mean body weight in the different groups. , Control group; , model group; , low-phytic acid-dose group; , middle-phytic acid-dose group; , high-phytic acid-dose group.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Representative pictures of colon tumours in the different groups. (a) Control group, (b) model group, (c) low-phytic acid-dose group, (d) middle-phytic acid-dose group, (e) high-phytic acid-dose group.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Representative sections stained with haematoxylin–eosin showing the histopathology of the colonic wall in the different groups. The magnification is 400×. (a) Control group, (b) model group, (c) low-phytic acid-dose group, (d) middle-phytic acid-dose group, (e) high-phytic acid-dose group.

Figure 4

Table 2 Occurrence of tumours in experimental animals

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Real-time PCR analysis of mucin 2 (MUC2) (a) and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) (b) mRNA expression levels. The normal colon tissues were selected in the control group (CG) and the colon tumour tissues were selected in the other groups. β-Actin was used as a loading control. MG, model group; PA, phytic acid; LPG, low-PA-dose group; MPG, middle-PA-dose group; HPG, high-PA-dose group. **P<0·01, CG compared with the MG; †† P<0·01, PA treatment groups compared with the MG.

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Real-time PCR analysis of mRNA expression of claudin-1 (a) and E-cadherin (b). The normal colon tissues were selected in the control group (CG) and the colon tumour tissues were selected in the other groups. β-Actin was used as a loading control. MG, model group; PA, phytic acid; LPG, low-PA-dose group; MPG, middle-PA-dose group; HPG, high-PA-dose group. ** P<0·01, CG compared with the MG; † P<0·05, †† P<0·01, PA treatment groups compared with the MG.

Figure 7

Fig. 6 Western blot analysis of mucin 2 (MUC2) and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3) protein expression. The normal colon tissues were selected in the control group (CG) and the colon tumour tissues were selected in the other groups. β-Actin was used as a loading control. (a) Representative blots from one of three separate experiments; (b) relative band intensities of MUC2 based on densitometry; (c) relative band intensities of TFF3 based on densitometry. MG, model group; PA, phytic acid; LPG, low-PA-dose group; MPG, middle-PA-dose group; HPG, high-PA-dose group. ** P<0·01, CG compared with the MG; †† P<0·01, PA treatment groups compared with the MG.

Figure 8

Fig. 7 Western blot analysis of claudin-1 and E-cadherin protein expression. The normal colon tissues were selected in the control group (CG) and the colon tumour tissues were selected in the other groups. β-Actin was used as a loading control. (a) Representative blots from one of three separate experiments; (b) Relative band intensities of claudin-1 based on densitometry; (c) Relative band intensities of E-cadherin based on densitometry. MG, model group; PA, phytic acid; LPG, low-PA-dose group; MPG, middle-PA-dose group; HPG, high-PA-dose group. ** P<0·01, CG compared with the MG; † P<0·05, †† P<0·01, PA treatment groups compared with the MG.

Figure 9

Fig. 8 ELISA was used to detect the D-lactate (D-LA) (a) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (b) concentrations in the serum. CG, control group; MG, model group; PA, phytic acid; LPG, low-PA-dose group; MPG, middle-PA-dose group; HPG, high-PA-dose group. ** P<0·01, CG compared with the MG; †† P<0·01, PA treatment groups compared with the MG.

Figure 10

Fig. 9 ELISA was used to detect TNF-α (a), IL-1β (b) and IL-6 (c) concentrations in the serum. CG, control group; MG, model group; PA, phytic acid; LPG, low-PA-dose group; MPG, middle-PA-dose group; HPG, high-PA-dose group. ** P<0·01, CG compared with the MG; † P<0·05, †† P<0·01, PA treatment groups compared with the MG.

Supplementary material: Image

Liu et al. supplementary material 1

Supplementary Figure

Download Liu et al. supplementary material 1(Image)
Image 381.2 KB