Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T22:10:47.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subdural and Systemic C-Reactive Protein in Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma Recurrence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2025

Jonathan Truels Hansen Open the ORCID record for Jonathan Truels Hansen [Opens in a new window] ,
Thomas Svinning Valeur Tursø ,
Markus Harboe Olsen ,
Tina Binderup ,
Kåre Fugleholm  and
Thorbjørn Søren Rønn Jensen
Jonathan Truels Hansen*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Thomas Svinning Valeur Tursø
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital - Holbaek, Holbaek, Denmark
Markus Harboe Olsen
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroanesthesiology, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark Department of Anaesthesiology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
Tina Binderup
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine & Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Rigshospitalet & Department of Biomedical Sciences, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
Kåre Fugleholm
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Thorbjørn Søren Rønn Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, The Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Corresponding author: Jonathan Truels Hansen; Email: jonathantruelshansen@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

C-reactive protein (CRP) level in blood is a standard marker for systemic inflammation. Inflammation is central in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) pathophysiology, and inflammatory biomarkers may hold clinical potential in assessing the level of inflammation induced by a CSDH. This study explores the role of CRP in patients with CSDH by (1) measuring systemic and subdural CRP levels, (2) investigating CRP as a potential predictor for recurrent CSDH and (3) comparing CRP levels between the first and second operations in patients with CSDH recurrence.

Methods:

CRP levels were measured both in systemic blood and subdural fluid from adult CSDH patients. Recurrence rate and mortality within 90 days were recorded. In total, 111 patients were included, of whom 25 were operated on for CSDH recurrence.

Results:

Systemic CRP levels (2.54 mg/L (1.40–9.75)) were higher than subdural levels (2.09 mg/L [0.99–5.22]) (p < 0.0001) but within the clinically defined normal CRP range of < 3 mg/L. Neither systemic nor subdural CRP levels could predict recurrence. Both systemic and subdural CRP levels in recurrent CSDH patients were higher at the time of the second surgery compared to the first surgery (psystemic = 0.004 and psubdural < 0.0001).

Conclusion:

This is the first study to establish a correlation between systemic and subdural CRP levels in CSDH patients. The increased levels of CRP at the time of the second surgery may demonstrate a constantly evolving inflammatory process toward the development of a recurrence.

Résumé

RÉSUMÉTaux sous-duraux et sanguins de protéine C réactive dans les cas de récidive d’hématome sous-dural chronique.Contexte :

Le taux de protéine C réactive (PCR) dans le sang est un marqueur normal d’inflammation générale, et l’inflammation joue un rôle fondamental dans la physiopathologie de l’hématome sous-dural chronique (HSDC). Il se pourrait donc que des biomarqueurs d’inflammation soient porteurs d’un potentiel clinique dans l’évaluation du taux d’inflammation provoqué par les HSDC. L’équipe de recherche visait donc à étudier le rôle de la PCR dans les HSDC en procédant : 1) à des mesures de taux sanguins et sous-duraux de protéine C réactive; 2) à une analyse du caractère potentiel de la PCR d’être considérée comme un facteur prévisionnel de récidive d’HSDC; 3) à une comparaison des taux de PCR relevés à la première et à la deuxième opération chez les patients ayant subi une récidive d’HSDC.

Méthode :

Il y a eu mesure des taux sanguins et sous-duraux de PCR chez des adultes souffrant d’un HSDC. Ont aussi été consignés les taux de récidive et la mortalité dans les 90 jours suivant l’événement. Au total, 111 patients ont été retenus dans l’étude, dont 25 ont été opérés pour une récidive d’HSDC.

Résultats :

Les taux sanguins de PCR (2,54 mg/L [1,40 9,75]) étaient plus élevés que les taux sous-duraux (2,09 mg/L [0,99 5,22]) (p < 0,0001), mais ils se situaient dans la plage de valeurs jugées normales sur le plan clinique, inférieures à 3 mg/L. Ni les taux sanguins ni les taux sous-duraux de PCR n’ont permis de prévoir les récidives. Par contre, tant les taux sanguins que les taux sous-duraux de PCR étaient plus élevés au moment de la deuxième opération qu’au moment de la première (psanguin = 0,004 et psous-dural < 0,0001).

Conclusion :

Il s’agit là de la première étude permettant d’établir une corrélation entre les taux sanguins et sous-duraux de PCR dans les HSDC. L’augmentation du taux de PCR au moment de la deuxième opération peut être révélateur d’un processus inflammatoire en constante évolution, qui aboutit à la récidive d’hématome.

Keywords

biomarkerchronic subdural hematomaC-reactive protein (CRP)inflammationpathophysiologypredicting recurrence

Information

Type
Original Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , March 2026 , pp. 247 - 253
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation

Highlights

  • As systemic and local inflammation are central in CSDH pathophysiology, CRP may be an important component in the development of CSDH.

  • Increased CRP levels at time of second surgery for CSDH may demonstrate a constantly evolving inflammatory process toward the development of recurrence.

  • CRP levels cannot predict CSDH recurrence rates.

Background

Local inflammation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH), as seen by the elevated levels of local inflammatory biomarkers.Reference Edlmann, Giorgi-Coll, Whitfield, Carpenter and Hutchinson1 Biomarkers have previously shown clinical potential as predictors for hematoma recurrence and potential targets for anti-inflammatory treatment.Reference Jensen, Binderup, Olsen, Kjaer and Fugleholm2,Reference Jensen, Olsen, Lelkaitis, Kjaer, Binderup and Fugleholm3 However, relying on experimental biomarkers as predictors for recurrenceReference Jensen, Olsen, Lelkaitis, Kjaer, Binderup and Fugleholm3 is clinically less feasible than using routine markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP).

CRP is an important part of the innate immune system and acts as an acute-phase reactant produced in response to systemic or local inflammation, infection or tissue damage.Reference Black, Kushner and Samols8 CRP is mainly expressed and produced by hepatocytes as a native pentameric CRP (nCRP) that can also dissociate into a monomeric form (mCRP) and has a normal plasma level below 0.3 mg/dL.Reference Nehring, Goyal and Patel9 Both CRP conformations play an important role in systemic inflammation, with nCRP as an important activator of the complement system.Reference Torzewski, Torzewski and Bowyer10 mCRP is intrinsically expressed in brain microvessels, astrocytes and neurons, as well as demonstrating angiogenic properties.Reference Yao, Zhang and Wu11,Reference Di Napoli, Slevin, Popa-Wagner, Singh, Lattanzi and Divani12

CSDH has a recurrence rate of 10%–30%, and research suggests that an ongoing inflammatory process nourishes the hematoma, potentially leading to recurrence.Reference Edlmann, Giorgi-Coll, Whitfield, Carpenter and Hutchinson1,Reference Kolias, Chari, Santarius and Hutchinson13,Reference Weigel, Schmiedek and Krauss14 CRP levels are increased by inflammatory cytokines, particularly interleukin (IL)-6.Reference Wu, Potempa, El Kebir and Filep15 Especially IL-6 has been linked to the pathophysiology of hematoma enlargement in CSDH, and the local level of IL-6 is increased in the hematoma fluid from patients with recurrent CSDH.Reference Pripp and Stanišić7,Reference Frati, Salvati and Mainiero16,Reference Stanisic, Aasen and Pripp17 The role of CRP in CSDH remains poorly understood but seems to be connected to the inflammatory and angiogenetic probabilities of CSDH (18–22). Therefore, CRP may have a role in the development of both primary and recurrent CSDH.

We aimed to explore the role of CRP in patients with CSDH by (1) comparing the systemic and subdural levels of CRP, (2) investigating if CRP can be used as a prognostic predictor for recurrence and death and (3) investigating CRP in the pathophysiology of recurrent CSDH by comparing CRP levels between the first and second operations in patients with recurrent CSDH.

Methods

Study cohort

Adult patients (18 years or older) diagnosed with CSDH by CT orMRI were randomly included in the period between January 2020 and September 2021. Patients with head trauma up to 14 days before surgery were excluded to avoid patients with acute subdural hematomas. Also, patients with previous intracranial surgical treatments were excluded. The following patient variables were registered at the time of admission: sex, age, history of head trauma, use of blood thinning medications, preoperative symptoms and preoperative comorbidity according to the Charlson comorbidity index.Reference Charlson, Carrozzino, Guidi and Patierno23 The radiological variables included midline shift, hematoma volume calculated by the XYZ/2-method,Reference Sucu, Gokmen and Gelal24 localization and radiological subtype.Reference Jensen, Andersen-Ranberg, Poulsen, Bergholt, Hundsholt and Fugleholm25 To investigate if systemic infection affected CRP levels between patients with and without recurrent CSDH, treatment with non-prophylactic antibiotics in the period from the operation to two days postoperative was registered.

Bilateral hematomas were treated as two separate cases, as bilateral hematomas do not necessarily have the same radiological or molecular composition. At 90 days follow-up, recurrent CSDH and death were recorded. The definition of a recurrent CSDH was surgical evacuation of a previously treated same-sided CSDH.

Sample collection

Hematoma fluid samples were obtained through burr hole or craniotomy. To preserve the hematoma membrane and simultaneously prevent contamination of the hematoma blood with blood from surrounding tissue, the dura mater was carefully left untouched during bone removal. Once the bone had been removed, the dura mater was opened. Extraction of hematoma fluid was done with a syringe carrying a blunt needle. The outer hematoma membrane was carefully penetrated, and 10 mL of the hematoma fluid was collected. Patients were excluded if damage to the hematoma membrane caused leakage of subdural fluid prior to sample collection. Immediately after the fluid collection, the samples were transferred to silicone vacuum tubes containing a mix of protamine sulfate and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Systemic venous blood was collected at the time of the operation. The hematoma fluid and systemic blood underwent centrifugation for 10 minutes at 7000 revolutions/minute to isolate the supernatants, which were then stored at −80°C, while the pellets were discarded.

Luminex

The concentrations of CRP in both the hematoma fluid and systemic blood samples were assessed using a Luminex multiplex antibody-based bead kit (Procartaplex, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark), following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Samples were measured and assessed individually (simplex), while standards were measured in duplicates. Samples were initially diluted 2000-fold, and samples lying above the measuring range on the standard curve were further diluted (up to 10,000-fold) for accurate quantification. The concentrations of CRP were measured in pg/mL and recalculated to mg/L, for the values to correspond to clinical CRP values.

Statistics

Data was handled using R version 4.2.1 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria). Continuous data was presented using median and interquartile range (IQR) due to skewness, while categorical variables were presented using n and percentage. Data was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for data from the same participant and presented using 95% Hodges–Lehmann confidence intervals (95% HLCI). Due to the severe skewness of the Luminex data, we also performed the Wilcoxon signed-rank test using log-transformed data as a sensitivity analysis. The prognostic ability of CRP was investigated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). The AUROC will be interpreted as representing “no better than chance” (∼0.5), low accuracy (0.5–0.7), moderate (0.7–0.9) and high accuracy (>0.9).Reference Schober, Mascha and Vetter26 To account for the censoring for death in the prognostication of recurrence, we performed a sensitivity analysis excluding dead participants. This is an exploratory study, and therefore, an alpha level of 0.05 for all analyses will be interpreted as significant.

Results

Study population

We included 146 hematomas from 111 patients, of whom 25 patients were operated on for recurrent CSDH, and 10 patients died within 90 days. Of the 25 patients with recurrent CSDH, 24 were male (p < 0.001). Recurrence rates were higher in patients with bilateral hematomas (p < 0.001), and patient mortality was higher in patients with a recurrent CSDH (p < 0.001). Full baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Patient demographics and comparison of patients with and without recurrent chronic subdural hematoma within 90 days

IQR = interquartile range; INR = international normalized ratio; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale. *Statistical significant (CI 95%), ψ defined as non-prophylactic antibiotic treatment at the time of surgery or started within two days postoperative.

Systemic versus subdural CRP levels

Systemic and subdural CRP levels were 2.54 mg/L (IQR: 1.40–9.75) and 2.09 mg/L (IQR: 0.99–5.22). The median difference between systemic and subdural CRP levels was 1.03 (95% HLCI: 0.50–2.57), which was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Both the systemic and subdural CRP levels were within the clinically defined normal CRP range in adults below 3 mg/L.Reference Nehring, Goyal and Patel9

CRP as a prognostic predictor for recurrence

Neither systemic nor subdural CRP levels were good predictors of outcome (Figure 1). To solely investigate recurrent CSDH as an outcome, we performed a sensitivity analysis, leaving out mortality. In this analysis, systemic CRP levels in patients without recurrence and with recurrence were 2.81 (1.47–12.38) and 1.76 (0.81–2.64), which predicted recurrence with low accuracy (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55–0.76) (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Box plot presenting the systemic (left figure) and subdural (right figure) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of patients with (green) and without (purple) recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. Both systemic and subdural CRP levels were significantly different (p < 0.0001).

Table 2.

This table presents CRP as a prognostic predictor for recurrent CSDH at the time of the primary CSDH evacuation

CRP as a predictor is investigated in both systemic circulation and hematoma fluid and in a sensitivity analysis from which fatalities are excluded. CRP = C-reactive protein; CSDH = chronic subdural hematoma; AUC = area under the curve.

CRP levels between the first and second operations in CSDH recurrence

For patients with recurrent CSDH, systemic and subdural CRP levels were 1.87 mg/L (IQR: 1.42–2.71) and 1.50 mg/L (IQR: 1.01–3.70) at the time of the first operation and 5.17 mg/L (IQR: 1.72–19.79) and 5.37 mg/L (IQR: 1.58–15.38) at the time of the second operation. Comparing both systemic and subdural CRP levels between the first and second operations in patients with recurrence showed significantly higher CRP levels at the time of the second surgery (p systemic = 0.004 and p subdural < 0.0001) (Figure 2). The presence of preoperative infection did not suggest any correlation to higher CRP levels (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Box plot presenting the systemic (left figure) and subdural (right figure) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the first (blue) and second (purple) operations in patients with recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. CRP levels were significantly different between the first and second operations (p systemic = 0.004 and p subdural < 0.0001).

Discussion

In this study, exploring systemic and subdural CRP levels in CSDH patients, systemic CRP levels were higher compared to the subdural CRP levels. Systemic CRP levels could predict recurrence only with low accuracy, albeit the median CRP levels were within the normal range of CRP. CRP levels were significantly higher both systemically and in the subdural fluid at the time of the second operation in patients with recurrent CSDH.

Systemic and subdural CRP in CSDH patients

CRP is mainly synthesized by IL-6-dependent hepatocytes, and following an inflammatory incident, CRP mediates the downstream acute-phase response.Reference Black, Kushner and Samols8 Due to the inflammatory properties of CRP, and as inflammation plays a central part in the pathophysiology of CSDH, it is plausible to suspect an involvement of CRP in the subdural cavity. Contrary to other CSDH-related biomarkers, the systemic CRP levels were higher than the subdural levels.Reference Edlmann, Giorgi-Coll, Whitfield, Carpenter and Hutchinson1,Reference Jensen, Binderup, Olsen, Kjaer and Fugleholm2,Reference Jensen, Olsen, Lelkaitis, Kjaer, Binderup and Fugleholm3,Reference Stanisic, Aasen and Pripp17,Reference Stanisic, Lyngstadaas and Pripp27 As CRP is mainly produced in the liver, it is unlikely that subdural CRP levels should exceed systemic CRP levels, since it is only sparsely produced by leukocytes and nervous tissue.Reference Yao, Zhang and Wu11,Reference Di Napoli, Slevin, Popa-Wagner, Singh, Lattanzi and Divani12 The balance between CRP levels at a pathological site and systemic CRP levels has to some extent been investigated in other diseases. In atherosclerotic disease, CRP binds to damaged cell membranes, contributing to local activation of the complement system.Reference Torzewski, Torzewski and Bowyer10,Reference Kaplan and Volanakis28 In infarcted heart tissue, CRP activates the complement cascades, causing additional heart damage, being only present in the infarcted myocardial cells and not the healthy.Reference Lagrand, Niessen and Wolbink29 Also, it has been shown that CRP is localized in nuclei of synovial cells of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Reference Gitlin, Gitlin and Gitlin30 Nevertheless, others report on CRP predominantly being localized systemically rather than confined to a specific site of inflamed tissue.Reference Vigushin, Pepys and Hawkins31,Reference Babaei, Javadian and Narimani32 The current understanding of local, tissue-specific higher levels of CRP, compared to systemic levels, is uncertain, and our study points toward CRP as mainly being a systemic biomarker for inflammation driven by CSDH.

CRP is not relevant in predicting CSDH outcome

In the sensitivity analysis, systemic CRP level predicted CSDH recurrence with only low accuracy . Also, the median CRP level of both patients with and without recurrent CSDH was within the normal systemic CRP range below 3 mg/L.Reference Nehring, Goyal and Patel9 Therefore, systemic CRP levels for both patients with and without recurrence would clinically be regarded as normal, resulting in limited clinical value of CRP as a predictor for recurrent CSDH.

Increasing CRP levels point toward increasing inflammation during CSDH recurrence

High IL-6 and IL-8 levels in the subdural fluid are correlated with increased risk of CSDH recurrence.Reference Hong, Kim, Yi, Ko, Oh and Kim6,Reference Frati, Salvati and Mainiero16 As CRP is linked to IL-6, this correlates well with the increasing levels of both subdural and systemic CRP levels in recurrent hematomas found in this study and provides a plausible pathological explanation. Furthermore, an increase in the anti-inflammatory IL-1 receptor antagonist has been demonstrated at the time of the second operation in recurrent CSDH patients, which has been interpreted as a regulatory mechanism against an increased inflammatory processes.Reference Jensen, Binderup, Olsen, Kjaer and Fugleholm2 In a recent analysis integrating several relevant biomarkers, a higher level of anti-inflammatory markers correlated significantly with a lower risk of recurrence.Reference Pripp and Stanišić7 Therefore, the increase in CRP levels between the first and second operations points toward an overall progressive inflammatory process toward a recurrence of a CSDH.

mCRP is expressed in CNS microvessels and by nervous tissue showing angiogenic properties.Reference Di Napoli, Slevin, Popa-Wagner, Singh, Lattanzi and Divani12 This resonates with multiple studies demonstrating a rapid angiogenic process forming fragile and leaky capillaries within the hematoma membrane, nourishing the hematoma and resulting in hematoma expansion, and thereby demonstrates a possible target for future CSDH management, as both inflammation and angiogenesis are important factors in CSDH pathology.Reference Edlmann, Giorgi-Coll, Whitfield, Carpenter and Hutchinson1 Targeting strategies against CRP have been presented with the possibility of lowering circulating CRP levels with both medication-associated decreases in CRP levels induced by statins, bempedoic acids, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsReference Ridker, Danielson and Fonseca33,Reference Cicero, Fogacci, Hernandez and Banach34 but also targeting CRP directly, inhibiting the dissociation of anti-inflammatory nCRP to the proinflammatory mCRP form.Reference Prasad35,Reference Zeller, Cheung Tung Shing and Nero36 Knowledge of local and systemic CRP levels in CSDH patients may therefore assist in an anti-inflammatory, nonsurgical treatment method, the clinical value of which is still uncertain.Reference Hutchinson, Edlmann and Bulters37–Reference Miah, Holl and Blaauw39

Limitations

While most baseline characteristics were similar between patients with and without recurrent CSDH, a few differed. Patients with recurrent CSDH were almost entirely male. To the best of our knowledge, even though no studies demonstrate that male gender is a risk factor for recurrent CSDH, this may be likely, as male gender is known to be a risk factor for developing primary CSDH.Reference Tseng, Tseng, Liu, Lin, Hu and Hsiao40,Reference Andersen-Ranberg, Poulsen, Bergholt, Hundsholt and Fugleholm41 Also, significantly more patients with recurrent CSDH had bilateral hematomas, which may be expected as patients with bilateral CSDH have a higher recurrence rate compared to patients with unilateral CSDH.Reference Andersen-Ranberg, Poulsen, Bergholt, Hundsholt and Fugleholm41 A final limitation is the comparison between systemic versus subdural CRP levels in the first and second operations. As CRP is diffusible over the blood-brain barrier, increased subdural CRP levels at the time of the second operation could well be caused by increased systemic levels, as opposed to being expressed locally.

Conclusion

This study has for the first time correlated CRP levels in systemic blood and in the subdural fluid of patients with both primary and recurrent CSDH. CRP is present in both the subdural fluid and systemic blood and at significantly higher levels in systemic blood; however, both are within the normal range. Clinically, CRP is not suitable for the prediction of CSDH recurrence. However, CRP levels are significantly higher in both systemic blood and subdural fluid at the time of the second surgery in patients with recurrent CSDH, suggesting an evolving inflammatory process toward the development of a recurrent hematoma.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Author contributions

JTH drafted the original manuscript with TSRJ, validated and analyzed the results and edited the manuscript with all the co-authors. TTF analyzed and validated the results and edited the original and the final version of the manuscript. MHO managed the statistical analysis, analyzed the results and edited the final version of the manuscript. TB conceptualized the project, supervised and edited the final manuscript and generated, curated and analyzed data. KF conceptualized the project, analyzed and validated the data supervised and edited the final version of the manuscript. TSRJ conceptualized the project, collected the samples, analyzed and validated the data and prepared the first version of the manuscript with JTH. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding statement

This project received funding from the Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, Becket Foundation, Grosserer L. F. Foghts Foundation, the Research Foundation of Rigshospitalet and A.P. Moeller Foundation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study received approval from the Scientific Ethical Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark (Journal no. H-20051073). Either the patient or their next of kin could consent for study participation.

Consent for publication

All authors reviewed and consented publication of the final manuscript.

References

Edlmann, E, Giorgi-Coll, S, Whitfield, PC, Carpenter, KLH, Hutchinson, PJ. Pathophysiology of chronic subdural haematoma: inflammation, angiogenesis and implications for pharmacotherapy. J Neuroinflammation. 2017;14(1):108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, TSR, Binderup, T, Olsen, MH, Kjaer, A, Fugleholm, K. Subdural levels of Interleukin 1-receptor antagonist are elevated in patients with recurrent chronic subdural hematomas. Inflammation. 2023;46:1332–1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, TSR, Olsen, MH, Lelkaitis, G, Kjaer, A, Binderup, T, Fugleholm, K. Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor: An Important Focal Player in Chronic Subdural Hematoma? Inflammation. 2024;47(3):1015–1027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katano, H, Kamiya, K, Mase, M, Tanikawa, M, Yamada, K. Tissue plasminogen activator in chronic subdural hematomas as a predictor of recurrence. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(1):79–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujisawa, H, Ito, H, Saito, K, Ikeda, K, Nitta, H, Yamashita, J. Immunohistochemical localization of tissue-type plasminogen activator in the lining wall of chronic subdural hematoma. Surg Neurol. 1991;35(6):441–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hong, HJ, Kim, YJ, Yi, HJ, Ko, Y, Oh, SJ, Kim, JM. Role of angiogenic growth factors and inflammatory cytokine on recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma. Surg Neurol. 2009;71(2):161–165. discussion 5–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pripp, AH, Stanišić, M. The correlation between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in chronic subdural hematoma patients assessed with factor analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e90149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, S, Kushner, I, Samols, D. C-reactive protein. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(47):48487–48490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nehring, SM, Goyal, A, Patel, BC. C Reactive Protein. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2024.Google Scholar
Torzewski, J, Torzewski, M, Bowyer, DE, et al. C-reactive protein frequently colocalizes with the terminal complement complex in the intima of early atherosclerotic lesions of human coronary arteries. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18(9):1386–1392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, Z, Zhang, Y, Wu, H. Regulation of C-reactive protein conformation in inflammation. Inflamm Res. 2019;68(10):815–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Napoli, M, Slevin, M, Popa-Wagner, A, Singh, P, Lattanzi, S, Divani, AA. Monomeric C-reactive protein and cerebral hemorrhage: from bench to bedside. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolias, AG, Chari, A, Santarius, T, Hutchinson, PJ. Chronic subdural haematoma: modern management and emerging therapies. Nat Rev Neurol. 2014;10(10):570–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weigel, R, Schmiedek, P, Krauss, JK. Outcome of contemporary surgery for chronic subdural haematoma: evidence based review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(7):937–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Y, Potempa, LA, El Kebir, D, Filep, JG. C-reactive protein and inflammation: conformational changes affect function. Biol Chem. 2015;396(11):1181–1197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frati, A, Salvati, M, Mainiero, F, et al. Inflammation markers and risk factors for recurrence in 35 patients with a posttraumatic chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective study. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(1):24–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanisic, M, Aasen, AO, Pripp, AH, et al. Local and systemic pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine patterns in patients with chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective study. Inflamm Res. 2012;61(8):845–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Idowu, OE, Oyeleke, SO, Vitowanu, JM. Impact of inflammatory cell ratio, biomarkers, activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time on chronic subdural haematoma severity and outcome. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022;48(2):1085–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, JJ, Kim, HS, Lee, KC, Hur, H, Jo, YY. Prediction of in-hospital mortality and morbidity using high-sensitivity C-reactive protein after burr hole craniostomy. J Anesth. 2016;30(6):956–960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, S, Ma, Y, Zhao, X, et al. Risk factors of hospital mortality in chronic subdural hematoma: a retrospective analysis of 1117 patients, a single institute experience. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;67:46–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melander, N, Sönnerqvist, C, Olivecrona, M. Non-surgical patient characteristics best predict outcome after 6 months in patients surgically treated for chronic subdural haematoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2023;114:151–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, T, Kuroda, K, Yoshida, Y, Ogasawara, K, Ogawa, A, Endo, S. Local elevation of the anti-inflammatory interleukin-10 in the pathogenesis of chronic subdural hematoma. Neurosurg Rev. 2006;29(3):242–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlson, ME, Carrozzino, D, Guidi, J, Patierno, C. Charlson comorbidity index: a critical review of clinimetric properties. Psychother Psychosom. 2022;91(1):8–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sucu, HK, Gokmen, M, Gelal, F. The value of XYZ/2 technique compared with computer-assisted volumetric analysis to estimate the volume of chronic subdural hematoma. Stroke. 2005;36(5):998–1000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, TSR, Andersen-Ranberg, N, Poulsen, FR, Bergholt, B, Hundsholt, T, Fugleholm, K. The danish chronic subdural hematoma study-comparison of hematoma age to the radiological appearance at time of diagnosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020;162(9):2007–2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schober, P, Mascha, EJ, Vetter, TR. Statistics From A (Agreement) to Z (z Score): A Guide to Interpreting Common Measures of Association, Agreement, Diagnostic Accuracy, Effect Size, Heterogeneity, and Reliability in Medical Research. Anesth Analg. 2021;133(6):1633–1641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanisic, M, Lyngstadaas, SP, Pripp, AH, et al. Chemokines as markers of local inflammation and angiogenesis in patients with chronic subdural hematoma: a prospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(1):113–120. discussion 20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaplan, MH, Volanakis, JE. Interaction of C-reactive protein complexes with the complement system. I. Consumption of human complement associated with the reaction of C-reactive protein with pneumococcal C-polysaccharide and with the choline phosphatides, lecithin and sphingomyelin. J Immunol. 1974;112(6):2135–2147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrand, WK, Niessen, HW, Wolbink, GJ, et al. C-reactive protein colocalizes with complement in human hearts during acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;95(1):97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitlin, JD, Gitlin, JI, Gitlin, D. Localizing of C-reactive protein in synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1977;20(8):1491–1499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigushin, DM, Pepys, MB, Hawkins, PN. Metabolic and scintigraphic studies of radioiodinated human C-reactive protein in health and disease. J Clin Invest. 1993;91(4):1351–1357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babaei, M, Javadian, Y, Narimani, H, et al. Correlation between systemic markers of inflammation and local synovitis in knee osteoarthritis. Caspian J Intern Med. 2019;10(4):383–387.Google Scholar
Ridker, PM, Danielson, E, Fonseca, FA, et al. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(21):2195–2207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicero, AFG, Fogacci, F, Hernandez, AV, Banach, M. Efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasad, K. C-reactive protein (CRP)-lowering agents. Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2006;24(1):33–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeller, J, Cheung Tung Shing, KS, Nero, TL, et al. A novel phosphocholine-mimetic inhibits a pro-inflammatory conformational change in C-reactive protein. EMBO Mol Med. 2023;15(1):e16236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, PJ, Edlmann, E, Bulters, D, et al. Trial of dexamethasone for chronic subdural hematoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(27):2616–2627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saul, H, Gursul, D, Cassidy, S, Hutchinson, P, Kolias, A. Dexamethasone should not be given to people with a chronic subdural haematoma. BMJ. 2022;377:o1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miah, IP, Holl, DC, Blaauw, J, et al. Dexamethasone versus surgery for chronic subdural hematoma. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(24):2230–2240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tseng, JH, Tseng, MY, Liu, AJ, Lin, WH, Hu, HY, Hsiao, SH. Risk factors for chronic subdural hematoma after a minor head injury in the elderly: a population-based study. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:218646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen-Ranberg, NC, Poulsen, FR, Bergholt, B, Hundsholt, T, Fugleholm, K. Bilateral chronic subdural hematoma: unilateral or bilateral drainage? J Neurosurg. 2017;126(6):1905–1911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Patient demographics and comparison of patients with and without recurrent chronic subdural hematoma within 90 days

Figure 1

Figure 1. Box plot presenting the systemic (left figure) and subdural (right figure) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels of patients with (green) and without (purple) recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. Both systemic and subdural CRP levels were significantly different (p < 0.0001).

Figure 2

Table 2. This table presents CRP as a prognostic predictor for recurrent CSDH at the time of the primary CSDH evacuation

Figure 3

Figure 2. Box plot presenting the systemic (left figure) and subdural (right figure) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels between the first (blue) and second (purple) operations in patients with recurrent chronic subdural hematoma. CRP levels were significantly different between the first and second operations (psystemic = 0.004 and psubdural < 0.0001).