Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T12:16:35.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nicotinamide supplementation induces detrimental metabolic and epigenetic changes in developing rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2013

Da Li
Affiliation:
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang110001, People's Republic of China
Yan-Jie Tian
Affiliation:
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
Jing Guo
Affiliation:
College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
Wu-Ping Sun
Affiliation:
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
Yong-Zhi Lun
Affiliation:
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
Ming Guo
Affiliation:
College of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
Ning Luo
Affiliation:
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
Yu Cao
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang110001, People's Republic of China
Ji-Min Cao
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine Peking Union Medical College, Beijing100730, People's Republic of China
Xiao-Jie Gong*
Affiliation:
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
Shi-Sheng Zhou*
Affiliation:
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Medical College, Dalian University, Dalian116622, People's Republic of China
*
*Corresponding authors:S.-S. Zhou, ; fax +86 411 87402053, email zhouss@ymail.com; X.-J. Gong, email gxjsss@tom.com
*Corresponding authors:S.-S. Zhou, ; fax +86 411 87402053, email zhouss@ymail.com; X.-J. Gong, email gxjsss@tom.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ecological evidence suggests that niacin (nicotinamide and nicotinic acid) fortification may be involved in the increased prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes, both of which are associated with insulin resistance and epigenetic changes. The purpose of the present study was to investigate nicotinamide-induced metabolic changes and their relationship with possible epigenetic changes. Male rats (5 weeks old) were fed with a basal diet (control group) or diets supplemented with 1 or 4 g/kg of nicotinamide for 8 weeks. Low-dose nicotinamide exposure increased weight gain, but high-dose one did not. The nicotinamide-treated rats had higher hepatic and renal levels of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, a marker of DNA damage, and impaired glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity when compared with the control rats. Nicotinamide supplementation increased the plasma levels of nicotinamide, N1-methylnicotinamide and choline and decreased the levels of betaine, which is associated with a decrease in global hepatic DNA methylation and uracil content in DNA. Nicotinamide had gene-specific effects on the methylation of CpG sites within the promoters and the expression of hepatic genes tested that are responsible for methyl transfer reactions (nicotinamide N-methyltransferase and DNA methyltransferase 1), for homocysteine metabolism (betaine–homocysteine S-methyltransferase, methionine synthase and cystathionine β-synthase) and for oxidative defence (catalase and tumour protein p53). It is concluded that nicotinamide-induced oxidative tissue injury, insulin resistance and disturbed methyl metabolism can lead to epigenetic changes. The present study suggests that long-term high nicotinamide intake (e.g. induced by niacin fortification) may be a risk factor for methylation- and insulin resistance-related metabolic abnormalities.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Methionine–homocysteine cycle and methylation of substrates. In the cycle, methionine is activated by condensation with ATP to give the ubiquitous methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine. S-adenosylmethionine is converted to S-adenosylhomocysteine after donating its methyl group to a substrate and then further hydrolysed to homocysteine and adenosine. Homocysteine is either remethylated to methionine via the betaine-dependent or folate-dependent pathway or converted to cystathionine. 1, S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases; 2, adenosylhomocysteinase; 3, cystathionine β-synthase; 4, choline dehydrogenase; 5, betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase; 6, betaine–homocysteine methyltransferase; 7, methionine synthase; 8, methionine adenosyltransferase. DHF, dihydrofolate; THF, tetrahydrofolate; dTMP, deoxythymidine monophosphate; dUMP, deoxyuridine monophosphate.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Immunostaining for 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in the liver and kidney. Representative sections of immunohistochemistry for 8-OHdG from the (a) liver and (b) kidney of rats fed with the control diet (left, □) or diets supplemented with nicotinamide (NM) at a dose of 1 g/kg diet (middle, ) or 4 g/kg diet (right, ). ○, negative examples; ○, positive examples. Magnification is 400 × . Summary of the percentages of (c) 8-OHdG-positive hepatic cells and (d) kidney cells of control rats and two NM-treated groups (each group, n 10). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. ** Mean values were significantly different from that of the control diet (P< 0·001).

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Nicotinamide (NM) supplementation-induced changes in plasma levels of (a) NM, (b) N1-methylnicotinamide, (c) betaine, (d) choline and (e) homocysteine. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Mean values were significantly different from that of the control diet: * P< 0·05, ** P< 0·01. □, Control; , 1 g NM/kg diet; , 4 g NM/kg diet.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 (a) Hepatic global DNA methylation and (b) uracil content in hepatic nuclear DNA of rats fed with the control diet (□) or diets supplemented with 1 () or 4 g/kg () of nicotinamide (each group, n 10). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean values were significantly different from that of the control diet (P< 0·05).

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Effects of nicotinamide (NM) on DNA methylation. (a)–(h) Methylation pattern in the core promoter region of hepatic genes in rats fed with the control diet or diets supplemented with 1 or 4 g/kg of NM. Location of the core promoter cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) sites, along with primer-amplified fragments, guanine-cytosine (GC) percentage, individual CpG dinucleotides (dashes) and RefSeq gene (exon 1 shown as a box and intron shown as an arrowed line) according to the University of California, Santa Cruz, genome browser (Baylor 3.4/rn4 assembly). The arrows indicate transcriptional direction. The circles correspond to CpG sites denoted by black dashes: ●, methylated; ○, unmethylated. Nnmt, nicotinamide N-methyltransferase; Tp53, tumour protein p53; Bhmt, betaine–homocysteine S-methyltransferase; Cbs, cystathionine β-synthase; Ins1, insulin-1; Dnmt1, DNA methyltransferase 1; Mtr, methionine synthase; Cat, catalase.

Figure 5

Fig. 6 Nicotinamide (NM) supplementation-induced changes in hepatic gene expression. Relative mRNA levels were measured by real-time quantitative PCR (each group, n 10). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. (a) Nnmt, nicotinamide N-methyltransferase; (b) Dnmt1, DNA methyltransferase 1; (c) Cat, catalase; (d) Tp53, tumour protein p53; (e) Mtr, methionine synthase; (f) Bhmt, betaine–homocysteine S-methyltransferase; (g) Cbs, cystathionine β-synthase. □, Control; , 1 g NM/kg diet; , 4 g NM/kg diet.

Figure 6

Fig. 7 Effects of nicotinamide (NM) on weight gain and glucose tolerance. (a) Changes in weight gain, (b) fasting blood glucose, (c) 1 h blood glucose after glucose load (2 g/kg body weight, intraperitoneally) and (d) 1 h post-load serum insulin. Each group, n 10. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean values were significantly different from that of the control diet (P< 0·05). (a) , Control; , 1 g NM/kg diet; , 4 g NM/kg diet. (b)–(d) □, Control; , 1 g NM/kg diet; , 4 g NM/kg diet.

Supplementary material: PDF

Li Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Li Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 8.5 KB