Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-30T05:31:32.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2014

Gabriele Kasper  and
Johannes Wagner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the last decade, conversation analysis (CA) has increasingly contributed toseveral established fields in applied linguistics. In this article, we willdiscuss its methodological contributions. The article distinguishes betweenbasic and applied CA. Basic CA is a sociological endeavor concerned withunderstanding fundamental issues of talk in action and of intersubjectivity inhuman conduct. The field has expanded its scope from the analysis oftalk—often phone calls—towards an integration of languagewith other semiotic resources for embodied action, including space and objects.Much of this expansion has been driven by applied work.

After laying out CA's standard practices of data treatment andanalysis, this article takes up the role of comparison as a fundamentalanalytical strategy and reviews recent developments into cross-linguistic andcross-cultural directions. The remaining article focuses on applied CA, theapplication of basic CA's principles, methods, and findings to thestudy of social domains and practices that are interactionally constituted. Weconsider three strands—foundational, social problem oriented, andinstitutional applied CA—before turning to recent developments in CAresearch on learning and development. In conclusion, we address some emergingthemes in the relationship of CA and applied linguistics, including the role ofmultilingualism, standard social science methods as research objects,CA's potential for direct social intervention, and increasing effortsto complement CA with quantitative analysis.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 34 , March 2014 , pp. 171 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Antaki, C. (Ed.). (2011). Applied conversation analysis. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

This book documents recent developments in the application of CA to intervention in health and social services and other institutional activities.

Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29.

Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 30–52.

Heritage's two companion articles brought social epistemics to the forefront in the study of language and social interaction.

Markee, N., & Kunitz, S. (2013). Doing planning and task performance in second language acquisition: An ethnomethodological respecification. Language Learning, 63, 629–664.

This article is a good example of CA's critical tradition to challenge established concepts. It reexamines task planning as embodied, socially shared activity.

Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161–216.

This is a key article demonstrating CA's methodology and contribution to a theory of action.

Sidnell, J. (Ed.). (2009). Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

This book presents comparative studies demonstrating language-specific solutions to generic interactional problems.

REFERENCES

Antaki, C., Biazzi, M., Nissen, A., & Wagner, J. (2008). Accounting for moral judgments in academic talk: The case of a conversation analysis data session. Text & Talk, 28, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C. (2011). Six kinds of applied conversation analysis. In Antaki, C. (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Antaki, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Conversation analysis and the study of atypical populations. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 533–550). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. (1982). Understanding formality: the categorization and production of “formal” interaction. The British Journal of Sociology, 33 (1), 86–117.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. (1984). Public speaking and audience responses: some techniques for inviting applause. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 370–410). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Auer, P. (1984). Bilingual conversation. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, P. (Ed.). (1998). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biazzi, M. (2011). Italian learner varieties and syntax-in-interaction. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 267–325). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society, 10, 543‖582.Google Scholar
Bilmes, J. (2008). Generally speaking: Formulating an argument in the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Text & Talk, 28, 193–217.Google Scholar
Boden, D., & Zimmerman, D. H. (Eds.). (1991). Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS-NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal, 87, 534–545.Google Scholar
Brouwer, C. E. (2004). Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 93–113). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brouwer, C. E., Rasmussen, G., & Wagner, J. (2004). Embedded corrections in second language talk. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 75–92). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 29–47.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1995). Teacher professionalism and research. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, B. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 27–41). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1439–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2007). Variation in transcription. Discourse Studies, 9 (6), 784–808.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2009). Captured on tape: Professional hearing and competing entextualizations in the criminal justice system. Text & Talk, 29, 503–523.Google Scholar
Bushnell, C. (2012). Talking the talk: The interactional construction of community and identity at conversation analytic data sessions in Japan. Human Studies, 35, 583–605.Google Scholar
Bygate, M. (2005). Applied linguistics: A pragmatic discipline, a generic discipline? Applied Linguistics, 26, 568–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, D. (2004). Restarts in novice turn beginnings: Disfluencies or interactional achievements? In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 201–220). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cheng, T.-P. (2013). Codeswitching and participant orientations in a Chinese as a foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 869–886.Google Scholar
Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749–777.Google Scholar
Clayman, S., Elliott, M. N., Heritage, J., & McDonals, L. (2007). When does the watchdog bark? Conditions of aggressive questioning in presidential news conferences. American Sociological Review, 72, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curl, T. S., & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 129–153.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F., & Enfield, N. J. (2013). Is “huh?” a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE 8 (11): e78273. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273.Google Scholar
Drew, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 470–520). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992). Talk at work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, P., Raymond, G., & Weinberg, D. (Eds.). (2006). Talk and interaction in social research methods. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (2006). Discourse, cognition and social practices: The rich surface of language and social interaction. Discourse Studies, 8, 41–49.Google Scholar
Egbert, M., Golato, A., & Robinson, J. (2009). Repairing reference. In Sidnell, J. (Ed.), Comparative studies in conversation analysis (pp. 104–132). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egbert, M., Niebecker, L., & Rezzara, S. (2004). Inside first and second language speakers’ trouble in understanding. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 178–200). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., & de Ruiter, J. (2012). Epistemic dimensions of polar questions: Sentence-final particles in comparative perspective. In de Ruiter, J. P. (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 193–221). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Enfield, N. J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2007). Person reference in interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The L2 inventory in action: Usage-based linguistics and conversation analysis in second language acquisition. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 327–364). Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). Negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62, 335–372.Google Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W. (2014). What's new? A usage-based classroom study of linguistic routines and creativity in L2 learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2013). Recurring and shared gestures in the L2 classroom: Resources for teaching and learning. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–23.Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2006). Teaching the negotiation of multi-turn speech acts: Using conversation-analytic tools to teach pragmatics in the FL classroom. In Bardovi-Harlig, K., Félix-Brasdefer, J. C., & Omar, A. (Eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (Vol. 11, pp. 165–196). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On “lingua franca” English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, A. (2009). The lingua franca factor. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6, 147–170.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (3), 285–300.Google Scholar
Ford, C. E. (2008). Women speaking up: Getting and using turns in workplace meetings. New York, NY: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C. E., & Mori, J. (1994). Causal markers in Japanese and English conversations: A cross-linguistic study of interactional grammar. Pragmatics, 4 (1), 31–61.Google Scholar
Fox, B., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of the syntactic organization of repair. In Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 185–237). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Fox, B., Wouk, F., Hayashi, M., Fincke, S., Tao, L., Sorjonen, M-J., Laakso, M., Fincke, S., & Flores Hernandez, W. (2009). A cross-linguistic investigation of the site of initiation in same-turn self-repair. In Sidnell, J. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 60–103). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gafaranga, J. (2007). Talk in two languages. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gafaranga, J., & Torras, M. C. (2002). Interactional otherness: Towards a redefinition of codeswitching. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 1–22.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. (2007). The right connections: Acknowledging epistemic progression in talk. Language in Society, 36, 319–341.Google Scholar
Gardner, R., & Wagner, J. (Eds.). (2004). Second language conversations. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., & Forrester, M. (Eds.). (2010). Analyzing interactions in childhood. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1991). Respecification: evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order. In Button, G. (Ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences (pp. 10–19). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical action. In McKinney, J. C. & Tiryakian, E. A. (Eds.), Theoretical sociology (pp. 338–366). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization. Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2011). Contextures of action. In Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.), Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world (pp. 182–193). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Car talk: Integrating texts, bodies, and changing landscapes. Semiotica, 191, 257–286.Google Scholar
Greer, T. (2010). Switching languages, juggling identities: A sequence of multilingual, multi-party talk. In Kasper, G., Nguyen, H. t., Yoshimi, D., & Yoshioka, J. K. (Eds.), Pragmatics & language learning (Vol. 12, pp. 43–65). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Greer, T. (2013a). Establishing a pattern of dual-receptive language alternation. Australian Journal of Communication, 40, 47–62.Google Scholar
Greer, T. (2013b). Word search sequences in bilingual interaction: Codeswitching and embodied orientation toward shifting participant constellations. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 100–117.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (Eds.). (2011). L2 interactional competence and development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hauser, E. (2005). Coding “corrective recasts”: The maintenance of meaning and more fundamental problems. Applied Linguistics, 26, 293–316.Google Scholar
Hauser, E. (2008). Nonformal institutional interaction in a conversation club: Conversation partners’ questions. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 275–295.Google Scholar
Hauser, E. (2013a). Expanding resources for marking direct reported speech. In Greer, T., Tatsuki, D., & Roever, C. (Eds.), Pragmatics & language learning (Vol. 13, pp. 29–53). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Hauser, E. (2013b). Stability and change in one adult's second language English negation. Language Learning, 63, 1–36.Google Scholar
Hayashi, M., & Yoon, K.-E. (2009). Negotiating boundaries in talk. In Sidnell, J. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 248–276). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
He, A. W. (2013). The wor(l)d is a collage: Multi-performance by Chinese heritage language speakers. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 304–317.Google Scholar
Heath, C. (1981). The opening sequence in doctor-patient interaction. In Atkinson, P. & Heath, C. (Eds.), Medical work: Realities and routines (pp. 71–90). Aldershot, UK: Gower.Google Scholar
Heath, C. (1986). Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J., & Luff, P. (2010). Video in qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Heinemann, T., Landgrebe, J., & Matthews, B. (2012). Collaborating to restrict: A conversation analytic perspective on collaboration in design. CoDesign, 8, 200–214.Google Scholar
Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984a). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 299–345). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984b), Garfinkel and ethnomethodology, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (1998). Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry. Language in Society, 27, 291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In Ford, C., Fox, B., & Thompson, S. (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 196–224). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2005). Cognition in discourse. In te Molder, H. & Potter, J. (Eds.), Conversation and cognition (pp. 184–202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 1–29.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45, 30–52.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities and institutions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. (Eds.). (2006). Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68, 15–38.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2012). Navigating epistemic landscapes: Acquiescence, agency and resistance in responses to polar questions. In de Ruiter, J. P. (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 179–192). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). The structure of patients’ presenting concerns 1: Physicians’ opening questions. Health Communication, 19, 89–102.Google Scholar
Hester, S., & Eglin, P. (Eds.). (1997). Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Hester, S., & Hester, S. (2012). Categorial occasionality and transformation: Analyzing culture in action. Human Studies, 35, 563–581.Google Scholar
Higgins, C. (2009). “Are you Hindu?” Resisting membership categorization through language alternation. In Nguyen, H. t. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 111–136). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Hopper, R. (1992). Telephone conversations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hosoda, Y. (2006). Repair and relevance of differential language expertise in second language conversations. Applied Linguistics, 27, 25–50.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, H. (2000). Interaction and the standardized survey interview. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I. (1996). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio. New York, NY: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Huth, T., & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching pragmatics? Language Teaching Research, 10, 53–79.Google Scholar
Ikeda, K., & Ko, S. (2011). Choral practice patterns in the language classrooms. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 163–184). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Ishida, M. (2009). Development of interactional competence: Changes in the use of ne in L2 Japanese during study abroad. In Nguyen, H. t. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 351–387). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Ishida, M. (2011). Engaging in another person's telling as a recipient in L2 Japanese: Development of interactional competence during one-year study abroad. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 45–56). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1979). A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance/declination. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1984). On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 346–369). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1985). An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In van Dijk, T. (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 25–34). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (1990). List-construction as a task and resource. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Interaction competence (pp. 63–92). Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis & University Press of America.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. (2010). Sometimes a frog in your throat is just a frog in your throat: Gutturals as (sometimes) laughter-implicative. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 1476–1484.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In Button, G. & Lee, J. R. E. (Eds.), Talk and social organization (152–205). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jenks, C. J. (2011). Transcribing talk and interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2004). Participant orientations in German conversation-for-learning. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 551–567.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2009). Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: Inside the skull or in public view? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 11–36.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Kim, Y. (in press). Conversation-for-learning: Institutional talk beyond the classroom. In Markee, N. (Ed.), Handbook of classroom discourse and interaction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kidwell, M. (2013). Interaction among children. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 511–532). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2009). The Korean discourse markers -nuntey and kuntey in native-nonnative conversation. In Nguyen, H. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 317–350). Honolulu: National Foreign Language Resources Center.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2012). Practices for initial recognitional reference and learning opportunities in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 709–729.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C. (2000). Doing feminist conversation analysis. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 163–193.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C. (2005). “Speaking as a heterosexual”: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38, 221–265.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C. (2008). Developing feminist conversation analysis: A response to Wowk. Human Studies, 31, 179–208.Google Scholar
Koshik, I. (2005). Beyond rhetorical questions. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kurhila, S. (2001). Correction in talk between native and non-native speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1083–1110.Google Scholar
Koschmann, T. (2013). Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In Mortensen, K. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Conversation analysis. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038–1043). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laurier, E. (2013). Before, in and after: Cars making their way through roundabouts. In Haddington, P., Mondada, L., & Nevile, M. (Eds.), Interaction and mobility (pp. 210–242). Berlin, Germany: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Lazaraton, A. (2002). A qualitative approach to the validation of oral language tests. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (Ed.). (2004). Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Li, Wei (200x).“What do you want me to say?” On the conversation analysis approach to bilingual interaction. Language in Society, 31, 159–180.Google Scholar
Li, Wei (Ed.). (2005). Conversational code-switching [Special issue]. Journal of Pragmatics, 37.Google Scholar
Li, Wei (2011). Multilinguality, multimodality, and multicompetence: Code- and mode-switching by minority ethnic children in complementary schools. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 370–384.Google Scholar
Li Wei, & Wu, C. (2009). Polite Chinese revisited: Creativity and the use of codeswitching in the Chinese complementary school classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12, 193–211.Google Scholar
Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2014). Tracing an L2 learner's motion constructions over time—A usage-based classroom investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 98, 612–628.Google Scholar
Liebscher, G., & Dailey–O’Cain, J. (2005). Learner codeswitching in the content-based foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 234–247.Google Scholar
Lindström, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L. (2013). Affiliation in conversation. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 350–369). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A. (2012). Instruction-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 35, 27–49.Google Scholar
Local, J. (1996). Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (Eds.), Prosody in conversation (pp. 177–230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bhatia, T. K. (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Luke, K. K., & Pavlidou, T. (Eds.). (2002). Telephone calls. Unity and diversity in conversational structure across languages and cultures. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
MacWhinney, B., & Wagner, J. (2010). Transcribing, searching and data sharing: The CLAN software and the TalkBank data repository. Gesprächsforschung—Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 11, 154–173. Retrieved from www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.deGoogle Scholar
Markee, N. (1994). Towards an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. In Tarone, E., Gass, M., & Cohen, A. (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (1995). Teachers’ answers to students’ questions: Problematizing the issue of meaning making. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 63–92.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29, 404–427.Google Scholar
Markee, N., & Seo, M.-S. (2009). Learning talk analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. W., & Schaeffer, N. C. (2012). Conversation analysis and interaction in standardized survey interviews. In Mortensen, K. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Conversation analysis. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1309Google Scholar
Maynard, D. W., & Freese, J. (2012). Good news, bad news, and affect: Practical and temporal “emotion work” in everyday life. In Peräkylä, A. & Sorjonen, M.-L. (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 92–112). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McHoul, A. W. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183–213.Google Scholar
McIlvenny, P. (Ed.). (2002). Talking gender and sexuality. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, M. (1977). The preference for self-correction in a Thai conversational corpus. Language, 53, 872–882.Google Scholar
Mishler, E. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Mori, J. (2003). The construction of interculturality: A study of initial encounters between Japanese and American students. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36, 143–184.Google Scholar
Mori, J. (2004). Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a Japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 536–550.Google Scholar
Mori, J., & Hasegawa, A. (2009). Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: Embodiment of cognitive states as social events. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47, 65–94.Google Scholar
Mori, J., & Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of interculturality through embodied completion: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27, 195–219.Google Scholar
Mortensen, K. (2011). Doing word explanation in interaction. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 135–162). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Nevile, M. (2012). Interaction as distraction in driving: A body of evidence. Semiotica, 191, 169–196.Google Scholar
Nevile, M., & Wagner, J. (2011). Language choice and participation: Two practices for switching languages in institutional interaction. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 211–235.) Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. t. (2008). Sequential organization as local and longitudinal achievement. Text and Talk, 28 (4), 501–528.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. T. (2011). Achieving recipient design longitudinally: Evidence from a pharmacy intern in patient consultations. In Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (Eds.), Interactional competence and development (pp. 173–205). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. t. (2012a). Developing interactional competence: A conversation-analytic study of patient consultations in pharmacy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. t. (2012b). Social interaction and competence development: Learning the sequential organization of a communicative practice. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 127–142.Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. t., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2009). Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Nishizaka, A. (2006). What to learn: The embodied structure of the environment. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 39, 119–154.Google Scholar
Nishizaka, A. (2011). The embodied organization of a real-time fetus: The visible and the invisible in prenatal ultrasound examinations. Social Studies of Science, 41, 309–336.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G., & Wagner, J. (Eds.). (2011). L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Park, Y. Y. (1998). A discourse analysis of contrastive connectives in English, Korean, and Japanese conversation: With special reference to the context of dispreferred responses. In Jucker, A. & Ziv, Y. (Eds.), Discourse markers: Descriptions and theory (pp. 277–300). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pekarek-Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2011). Developing “methods” for interaction: A cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (Eds.), Interactional competence and development (pp. 173–205). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Perdue, C. (Ed.). (2000). The structure of learner varieties [Special issue]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22 (3).Google Scholar
Peräkylä, A., & Sorjonen, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Emotion in interaction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2013). Conversation analysis and psychology. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 701–725). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Psathas, G. (1994). Conversation analysis. The study of talk-in-interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Raymond, G. (2003) Grammar and social organization: Yes/no type interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967.Google Scholar
Raymond, G., & Heritage, J. (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society, 35, 677–705.Google Scholar
Rhine, E. F., & Hall, J. K. (2011). Becoming the teacher: Changing participation frameworks in international teaching assistant discourse. In Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (Eds.), Interactional competence and development (pp. 244–271). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. D. (2006). Soliciting patients’ presenting concerns. In Heritage, J. & Maynard, D. (Eds.), Communication in medical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 22–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, S. J., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2013). Assessing second language pragmatics. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (2009). Gaze, questioning and culture. In Sidnell, J. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 187–249). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 329–345). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075–1095.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 23–78). New York, NY: Irvington.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9, 111–151.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161–216.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1999). “Schegloff's texts” as “Billig's data”: A critical reply. Discourse & Society, 10, 558–572.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). On granularity. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 715–720.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Reflections on research on telephone conversation: Issues of cross-cultural scope and scholarly exchange, interactional import, and consequences. In Luke, K. K. & Pavlidou, T.-S. (Eds.), Telephone calls (pp. 249–281). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (2009). One perspective on conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. In Sidnell, J. (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives (pp. 357–406). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation and the acquisition of communicative competence. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 137–174). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R. (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 237–326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. H. (1978). The acculturation model for second language acquisition. In Gringas, R. C. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and foreign language teaching. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sebba, M., & Wootton, A. J. (1998). We, they, and identity. Sequential versus identity related explanation of code-switching. In Auer, P. (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity (pp. 262–289). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Seo, M.-S. (2011). Talk, body, and material objects as coordinated interactional resources in repair activities in one-on-one ESL tutoring. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 107–134). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Seo, M.-S., & Koshik, I. (2010). A conversation analytic study of gestures that engender repair in ESL conversational tutoring. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2219–2239.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (Ed.). (2009). Conversation analysis: Comparative perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2013). Basic conversation analytic methods. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 77–99). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T. (Eds.). (2013). The handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A. (2005). Gender talk. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2011). Conversation and gender. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T. (2007). Prescribing under pressure: Physician-parent conversations and antibiotics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, , . . . Levinson, S. C. (2009). Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 106 (26), 10587–10592.Google Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (Eds.). (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E. (2012a). Categorial systematics. Discourse Studies, 14, 345–354.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E. (2012b). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14, 277–303.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D. (2007). “Black this, black that”: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations. Discourse & Society, 18, 337–372.Google Scholar
Stokoe, E., & Smithson, J. (2001). Making gender relevant: Conversation analysis and gender categories in interaction. Discourse & Society, 12, 217–244.Google Scholar
Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interaction: language and body in the material world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, A. (2009). When gaijin matters: Theory-building in Japanese multiparty interaction. In Nguyen, H. t. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 89–109). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Svennevig, J. (1999). Getting acquainted in conversation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Talmy, S. (2009). Resisting ESL: Categories and sequence in a critically “motivated” analysis of classroom interaction. In Nguyen, H. t. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Talk-in-interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 181–213). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Talmy, S., & Richards, K. (Eds.). (2011). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: Discursive perspectives [Special issue]. Applied Linguistics 32.Google Scholar
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2006). A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods. Research in the Schools, 13, 12–28.Google Scholar
te Molder, H., & Potter, J. (Eds.). (2005). Conversation and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
ten Have, P. (2001). Applied conversation analysis. In McHoul, A. & Rapley, M. (Eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings (pp. 3–11). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
ten Have, P. (2002). Comparing telephone openings: Theoretical and methodological reflections. In Luke, K. K. & Pavlidou, T.-S. (Eds.), Telephone calls (pp. 233–248). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Benjamins.Google Scholar
ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011a). Language learning activities in everyday situations: Insisting on TCU completion in second language talk. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 185–208). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011b). Second language interaction for business and learning. In Hall, J. K., Hellermann, J., & Pekarek-Doehler, S. (Eds.), Interactional competence and development (pp. 93–118). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thüne, E.-M., & Leonardi, S. (Eds.). (2003). Telefonare i diverse lingue [Speaking on the telephone in different languages]. Milan, Italy: Francoangeli.Google Scholar
Üstünel, E., & Seedhouse, P. (2005). Why that, in that language, right now? Codeswitching and pedagogical focus. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15, 302–325.Google Scholar
Vöge, M. (2011). Employing multilingualism for doing identity work and generating laughter in business meetings: a case study. In Pallotti, G. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 237–264). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. (1996). Foreign language acquisition through interaction—A critical review of research on conversational adjustments. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 215–235.Google Scholar
Wagner, J., & Gardner, R. (2004). Introduction. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 1–17). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.Google Scholar
West, C., & Garcia, A. (1988). Conversational shift work: A study of topical transitions between women and men. Social Problems, 35, 551–575.Google Scholar
Whitehead, K. A. (2009). Categorizing the categorizer: The management of racial common sense in interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72, 325–342.Google Scholar
Whitehead, K. A., & Lerner, G. (2009). When are persons “white”? On some practical asymmetries of racial reference in talk-in-interaction. Discourse & Society, 20, 613–641.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. (2011). Analysing focus group data. In Silverman, D. (Ed.), Qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 168–184). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2003). Constructing identities: A feminist conversation analytic approach to positioning in action. In Harré, R. & Moghaddam, F. (Eds.), The self and others in traditional psychology and in positioning theory (pp. 157–180). Westpoint, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 150–182.Google Scholar
Wootton, A. J. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, R., & He, A. W. (1998). Talking and testing: Discourse approaches to the assessment of oral proficiency. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2014). “Put your fingers in there”: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, 16, 163–183.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H. (1999). Horizontal and vertical comparative research in language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32, 195–203.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. H., & West, C. (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105–129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar