2.1 Overview of the scheme and model

Figure 1 illustrates schematically our scheme and the key features of the produced γ-photon beams. In order to demonstrate the proposed scheme, we performed full three-dimensional particle-in-cell (3D-PIC) simulations with the open-source code EPOCH. In the code, the QED BLOCK is enabled to include the emission of photons via a Monte Carlo algorithm, the radiation reaction effect, and the feedback between the plasma and photon-emission processes, whereas the effect of spin polarization is ignored^[Reference King, Elkina and Ruhl^60, Reference Sorbo, Seipt, Blackburn, Thomas, Murphy, Kirk and Ridgers^61]. In the first stage, a left-handed CP Gaussian laser pulse with the dimensionless laser electric field amplitude $\boldsymbol{a}={a}_0\exp \left(-{r}^2/{\sigma}_0^2\right)\left(\cos \varphi {\widehat{\boldsymbol{e}}}_y+\sin \varphi {\widehat{\boldsymbol{e}}}_z\right)$ is incident from the left side of the simulation box, where ${a}_0=\left({eE}_0\right)/\left({m}_ec{\omega}_0\right)=100$, ${\sigma}_0=3{\lambda}_0$ is the laser focus spot size, ${\lambda}_0=c{T}_0=1\;\unicode{x3bc} \mathrm{m}$ is the laser wavelength, T ₀ is the laser cycle, ϕ is the laser phase term, ω ₀ and E ₀ are the laser frequency and the electric field amplitude, and e, m_e, and c are the unit charge, the electron mass, and the speed of light in vacuum, respectively. This corresponds to a laser peak intensity of about 10²² W/cm², which is about one order of magnitude lower than the aimed maximum laser intensity in several laser infrastructures such as ELI^[Reference Mourou, Korn, Sandner and Collier^62], APOLLON^[Reference Papadopoulos, Zou, Blanc, Chériaux, Georges, Druon, Mennerat, Ramirez, Martin, Fréneaux, Beluze, Lebas, Monot, Mathieu and Audebert^63], and SULF^[Reference Li, Gan, Yu, Wang, Liu, Guo, Xu, Xu, Hang, Xu, Wang, Huang, Cao, Yao, Zhang, Chen, Tang, Li, Liu, Li, He, Yin, Liang, Leng, Li and Xu^64]. The pulse has a Gaussian time profile and the duration is 10T ₀. The grid size of the simulation box is $40{\lambda}_0\ (x)\times 12{\lambda}_0\ (y)\times 12{\lambda}_0\ (z)$, sampled by 2000×300×300 cells with 9 macro-particles per cell. The micro-channel target has a longitudinal axial length of $15{\lambda}_0$ and is located between $x=1{\lambda}_0$ and $x=16{\lambda}_0$ with thickness of ${d}_0=1{\lambda}_0$. The inner diameter of the micro-channel target is $6{\lambda}_0$. The fan-foil is left-handed (LH fan) and consists of eight parts with the same step height $\Delta =\lambda /16$ to mimic a $\lambda /2$ spiral phase plate^[Reference Shi, Shen, Zhang, Zhang, Wang and Xu^28]. The thickness equation of the fan-foil can be written as ${d}_n={d}_0+{d}_s\frac{\phi_n}{2\pi }$ ($n=\mathrm{0,1,2}\cdots$,7), where ${\phi}_n=H\left(\phi -\frac{\pi }{4}n\right)H\left[\left(n+1\right)\frac{\pi }{4}-\phi \right]\frac{\pi }{4}n$, ${d}_n$ is the thickness of n-order step, ${d}_0={\lambda}_0$ is the minimum thickness of the fan-foil, ${d}_s=\frac{1}{2}{\lambda}_0$ is the maximum thickness difference of the fan-foil, ϕ is the angle of cylindrical coordinate system, and H(x) is the Heaviside function. In addition, the fan-foil is perpendicular to the axis of the micro-channel and placed at $x=16{\lambda}_0$. If the foil acts as a perfect reflection mirror, the colorbars represent different phase changes when a plane wave is of normal incidence on the foil. The minimum thickness of the foil is $1\;\unicode{x3bc} \mathrm{m}$ to ensure that the foil remains opaque to the laser pulse. Both the micro-channel and fan-foil plastic target consist of fully ionized carbon and hydrogen ions with a 1:4 ratio of carbon to hydrogen. The corresponding densities of electrons, carbon ions (${\mathrm{C}}^{6+}$), and protons (${\mathrm{H}}^{+}$) are $200{n}_c$, $20{n}_c$, and $80{n}_c$, respectively, where ${n}_c=\left({m}_e{\epsilon}_0{\omega}_0^2\right)/{e}^2$ is the critical density and ${\varepsilon}_0$ is the vacuum dielectric constant. Periodic boundary conditions are used for both field and particles in the simulations. Note that the undesirable longer laser pulse pedestal derived from amplified spontaneous emission in experiments can be well controlled by plasma mirror technology^[Reference Doumy, Quéré, Gobert, Perdrix, Martin, Audebert, Gauthier, Geindre and Wittmann^65–Reference Dromey, Kar, Zepf and Foster^67], which is thus ignored in our simulations. Such high-contrast femtosecond laser pulses at relativistic intensity as needed here are readily available with double plasma mirrors. Meanwhile, some related experiments on micro-channels, wire-arrays or light fans have also been successfully carried out to explore electron acceleration, extreme pressure conditions, and vortex laser generation, respectively^[Reference Wang, Jiang, Dong, Lu and Xu^51, Reference Snyder, Ji, George, Willis, Cochran, Daskalova, Handler, Rubin, Poole, Nasir, Zingale, Chowdhury, Shen and Schumacher^68, Reference Purvis, Shlyaptsev, Hollinger, Bargsten, Pukhov, Prieto, Wang, Luther, Yin, Wang and Rocca^69].

Figure 1

Schematic of γ-ray vortex generation from a laser-illuminated light-fan-in-channel target. A CP laser pulse is incident from the left and irradiates a micro-channel target. Electrons are extracted from the channel wall, travel along the channel, and are accelerated to hundreds of MeV by the longitudinal electric fields. Later, the laser pulse is reflected along the – x axis by a light fan and an LG laser pulse is thus formed which collides head-on with the dense energetic electron beam with large AM. This finally results in the generation of a bright multi-MeV γ-ray vortex. Note that the fan-foil is perpendicular to the axis of the micro-channel and the arrow of reflected laser points to the micro-channel.

2.2 Electron acceleration in the micro-channel

Micro-channel targets have been widely employed to reshape the laser profile and enhance electron and ion acceleration^[Reference Snyder, Ji, George, Willis, Cochran, Daskalova, Handler, Rubin, Poole, Nasir, Zingale, Chowdhury, Shen and Schumacher^68, Reference Xiao, Huang, Ju, Li, Yang, Yang, Wu, Zhang, Qiao, Ruan, Zhou and He^70, Reference Yu, Zou, Yu, Yu, Yin, Shao, Zhuo, Zhou and Ruan^71]. They can act as a unique source of well-defined electron bunches and have potential applications in bright X/γ-photon emission. Assuming a CP plane wave in the form of $\mathbf{E}\left(x,y,z,t\right)=\mathbf{E}\left(x,y,z\right){e}^{i\left( kx-{\omega}_0t\right)}$, one can obtain ${\nabla}^2\mathbf{E}+{k}^2\mathbf{E}=0$ and $\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}=0$ from Maxwell equations. If the wave propagates in the positive $x$ direction, the longitudinal electric field can be described by ${E}_x=i/k\left(\partial {E}_y/\partial y+\partial {E}_z/\partial z\right)$. For a Gaussian laser pulse in free space with ${\mathbf{E}}_{\perp }={E}_0\exp \left(-{r}^2/{\sigma}^2\right)\left[\cos \left( kx-{\omega}_0t\right){\widehat{\mathbf{e}}}_y+\sin \left( kx-{\omega}_0t\right){\widehat{\mathbf{e}}}_z\right]$, the longitudinal component of laser pulse is of the form

(1)$$\begin{align}{E}_x=\frac{2{E}_0}{k{\sigma}^2}\exp \left(\frac{-{r}^2}{\sigma^2}\right)\left[\sin \left( kx-{\omega}_0t\right)y-\cos \left( kx-{\omega}_0t\right)z\right],\end{align}$$

which is obviously much smaller relative to the laser transverse electric field. As for the laser parameters used in our simulations, the amplitude of the longitudinal laser electric field is only about 0.03${E}_0$ based on Equation (1). However, when such a tightly focused Gaussian laser is injected into the micro-channel, the laser field distribution and propagation become quite different from that in vacuum. In this situation, the channel target acts as an optical waveguide, which is able to stimulate a series of high modes^[Reference Yu, Zou, Yu, Yu, Yin, Shao, Zhuo, Zhou and Ruan^71]. Although their transverse electric fields are relatively weaker than the incident Gaussian (LG${}_{00}$) mode as shown in Figure 2, they have much stronger longitudinal electric fields. Here, the longitudinal electric field in the plasma channel can be approximately written as^[71]

$$\begin{align*}{E}_x&\simeq {E}_0\frac{k_1{J}_{1,\max }}{k_x{J}_{x,\max}^{\prime }}\exp \left(-{r}_0^2/{\sigma}_0^2\right)\\&={E}_0\frac{1.164}{\sqrt{{\left(2\pi {r}_0/{v}_{1l}{\lambda}_0\right)}^2-1}}\exp \left(-{r}_0^2/{\sigma}_0^2\right),\end{align*}$$

Figure 2

Distributions of the transverse electric field E_y at different cross-sections from $x=11{\lambda}_0$ to $12{\lambda}_0$ at $t=16{T}_0$. The black dots represent the positions of energetic electrons dragged out from the channel wall.

where ${J}_{1,\max }$ and ${J}_{x,\max}^{\prime }$ are the maximum values of the first-order Bessel function of the first kind and its derivative with respect to r, respectively, and ${v}_{1l}$ is the lth root of the first-order Bessel function. As shown in Figures 3(b) and 3(c), the cross-section of the longitudinal electric field has higher mode which is in accord with the previous similar simulation^[Reference Yu, Zou, Yu, Yu, Yin, Shao, Zhuo, Zhou and Ruan^71]. The maximum dimensionless field amplitude of ${E}_x$ (${E}_x=20.45$) is nearly half of the maximum of ${E}_y$ (${E}_y=42.47$), which is close to the theoretical result as for the parameters used in our simulations, ${E}_x\simeq 0.78{E}_0$. Such a strong longitudinal electric field which is increased significantly as compared with that in vacuum is capable of accelerating electrons to high energies.

Figure 3

(a) Three-dimensional isosurface distribution of electron energy density of 60 MeV at $t=16{T}_0$. The (y, z) projection plane of electron energy density on the left is taken at $x=12{\lambda}_0$, the (x, y) projection plane at the bottom is taken at z = 0, and the (x, z) projection plane at the rear is taken at y = 0. Distribution of the (b) longitudinal electric field E_x and (c) transverse electric field E_y at $x\,=\,7.8{\lambda}_0$ and $t=17{T}_0$. (d) Typical electron trajectories in the phase space (${\eta}_x,{\eta}_{\perp }$). (e) Projection of some typical electron trajectories in the y–z plane until $t=30{T}_0$. Here the colorbar represents the electron energy. (f) Electron momentum distribution in the y–z plane at $t=20{T}_0$. Evolution of (g) electron beam divergence and (h) energy spectrum. The black dashed circles in (d)–(f) represent the boundaries of the micro-channel.

Figure 2 presents the transverse electric field E_y and electron distribution in the y–z plane ranging from $x=11{\lambda}_0$ to $12{\lambda}_0$ at $t=16{T}_0$. One sees that these electrons are well directed along the channel walls. At a single laser wavelength, e.g., $x=11{\lambda}_0$–$12{\lambda}_0$, these electrons located at different positions have different but regular spatial distribution, which is in excellent agreement with the laser transverse electric field. This indicates that these electrons are pulled out from the channel wall by the laser transverse electric field. They form a helical bunch as shown in Figure 3(a), with phase interval of $\pi$ between upper and lower parts, which results from the helical structure of the laser electric field.

In order to investigate the electron acceleration inside the micro-channel, we track some typical electrons (energy above 100 MeV at $t=16{T}_0$) in the simulations and record their positions and characteristics of the field experienced by the electrons. For clarity, we furthermore separate the electron energy gain into two parts, ${\eta}_x=-{q}_e{\int}_0^t{v}_x{E}_x\mathrm{d}t/{m}_{e0}{c}^2$, ${\eta}_{\perp }=-{q}_e{\int}_0^t\left({v}_y{E}_y+{v}_z{E}_z\right)\mathrm{d}t/{m}_{e0}{c}^2$. Here, ${\eta}_x$ is the energy gain by the longitudinal electric field, ${\eta}_{\perp }$ is the energy gain by the transverse field, and the electron energy $\gamma (t)=\gamma (0)+{\eta}_x+{\eta}_{\perp }$. The trajectories of the traced electrons in the phase space (${\eta}_x$, ${\eta}_{\perp }$) are shown in Figure 3(d). One can see that most of the electron acceleration is dominated by the longitudinal electric fields and the contribution of the transverse electric field to the electron acceleration is very limited. Figure 3(e) presents the projection of some typical electron trajectories in the y-z plane until $t=30{T}_0$ and Figure 3(f) shows the corresponding momenta at $t=20{T}_0$. Once the electrons are pulled out from the channel inner wall, they move forward around the laser axis. When the electrons enter into an applicable laser phase, they gain steady acceleration. However, the electron trajectories do not exactly point to the laser axis as indicated by Figure 3(e), but have a small deviation initially, implying a large OAM for each electron. This can be also seen from Figure 3(f), where the motion of most of the electrons is counterclockwise. The collective motion of these electrons in the micro-channel results in the formation of an energetic electron beam with large AM. Figures 3(g) and 3(h) present the evolution of the electron divergence with energy above 1 MeV and the corresponding electron energy spectra at $t=8{T}_0$, $16{T}_0$, $24{T}_0$, and $30{T}_0$. In this stage the electron beam is well directed along the micro-channel wall and is distinctive with a small divergence angle of approximately 5.7°, a cutoff energy of 240 MeV, and nC charges at $t=16{T}_0$. After that, the electrons are characterized by $4\pi$ radian in space and the cutoff energy drops rapidly at $t=30{T}_0$, indicating the commencement of the second stage.

2.3 Laser pulse reflection by the light fan

As the laser pulse propagates in the channel and arrives at the fan-foil attached to the channel, the second stage starts. Here, the thickness of the fan-foil increases with the angle ϕ in the cylindrical coordinate system, as illustrated in Figure 1. When the laser irradiates the fan-foil, the reflected laser wave at different angle ϕ has different phase change, resulting in an LG pulse generation. LG laser can carry OAM, which can improve the BAM of γ-ray and the conversion efficiency of laser- γ-ray AM. We will discuss this point later. Figure 4 shows the laser transverse electric field E_y in the y-z plane at different positions between $x=10{\lambda}_0$ and $11{\lambda}_0$ at $t=26{T}_0$ when the incident laser pulse is completely reflected. As expected, the fan-foil behaves like a light fan, which changes the pulse wavefront and intensity distribution in space and results in the formation of an LG vortex. For simplicity, we assume a perfect fan mirror. Thus, the laser mode of the reflected pulse can be expanded by a series of LG modes^[Reference Beijersbergen, Coerwinkel, Kristensen and Woerdman^72]. The amplitude of the LG_nm laser intensity can be defined in the cylindrical coordinate system ($\rho, \phi, x$) by

(2)$${\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}{\mathrm{L}\mathrm{G}}_{nm}\left(\rho, \phi, x\right)=\left({C}_{nm}/w\right)\exp \left(- ik{\rho}^2/2R\right)\exp \left(-{\rho}^2/{w}^2\right)\\ {}\kern1.5em \times \kern0.5em \exp \left[-i\left(n+m+1\right)\psi \right]\\ {}\quad\qquad\kern1.5em \times \kern0.5em \exp \left[-i\left(n-m\right)\phi \right]{\left(-1\right)}^{\min \left(n,m\right)}\\ {}\qquad\qquad\kern2.5em \times \kern0.5em {\left(\rho \sqrt{2}/w\right)}^{\mid n-m\mid }{L}_{\min \left(n,m\right)}^{\mid n-m\mid}\left(2{\rho}^2/{w}^2\right),\end{array}}$$

Figure 4

Distributions of the transverse electric field E_y at different cross-sections from $x=10{\lambda}_0$ to $11{\lambda}_0$ at $t=26{T}_0$ when the incident laser pulse is completely reflected by the light fan.

where $R(x)=\left({x}_R^2+{x}^2\right)/x$, $w(x)={\left[2\left({x}_R^2+{x}^2\right)/{kx}_R\right]}^{1/2}$, $\psi (x)=\arctan \left(x/{x}_R\right)$, C_nm is a normalization constant, $k=2\pi /\lambda$ is the wave number, ${x}_R$ is the Rayleigh range, ${L}_{\min \left(n,m\right)}^{\mid n-m\mid }(x)$ is the generalized Laguerre polynomial, and $l=\kern0.5em \mid n-m\mid$ is the azimuthal mode index. For a laser pulse with helical phase front and an exp(ilϕ) azimuthal phase dependence, the OAM along the laser propagating direction has a discrete value of $l\mathit{\hslash}$ per photon. Although the incident laser can stimulate a series of high modes in the channel, the dominant laser mode upon the fan-foil is still the former LG₀₀ as shown in Figure 2. Thus, mode decomposition of incident LG₀₀ mode whose wave front has been modified by the light fan structure can be written using the expansion coefficients^[Reference Beijersbergen, Coerwinkel, Kristensen and Woerdman^72]

(3)$$\begin{align}{{a}}_{st}&=\left\langle {\mathrm{L}\mathrm{G}}_{st}|\exp \left(- i\Delta \phi \right)|{\mathrm{L}\mathrm{G}}_{00}\right\rangle \nonumber \\[-2pt] &=\iint \rho \mathrm{d}\rho \mathrm{d}\phi \left({C}_{st}^{\ast }/{w}_{st}\right)\exp \left( ik{\rho}^2/2{R}_{st}-{\rho}^2/{w}_{st}^2\right) \nonumber \\[-2pt] &\quad\times \kern0.5em \exp \left[i\left(s-t\right)\phi \right]{\left(-1\right)}^{\min \left(s,t\right)}{\left(\rho \sqrt{2}/{w}_{st}\right)}^{\mid s-t\mid} \nonumber \\[-2pt] &\quad\times \kern0.5em {{L}}_{\min \left(s,t\right)}^{\mid s-t\mid}\left(2{\rho}^2/{w}_{st}^2\right)\exp \left(- i\Delta \phi \right)\nonumber \\[-2pt] &\quad\times \kern0.5em \left({C}_{00}/w\right)\exp \left(- i k{\rho}^2/2R-{\rho}^2/{w}^2\right). \end{align}$$

Here $\Delta \phi ={\sum}_{n=0}^7H\left(\phi -\pi /4n\right)H\left(\pi /4n+\pi /4-\phi \right)2\pi /8n$ and $H(x)$ is the Heaviside function. The mode thus becomes complicated and the percentage of the modes is given by ${I}_{st}={\left|{a}_{st}\right|}^2$. As $\Delta \phi \approx \phi$ as we settle in our simulations, only the modes with $l=s-t=1$ contribute most in the ϕ integral. Our calculations show that ${I}_{10}\approx 78.5\%$, so the dominant mode of the reflected laser pulse should be LG₁₀ ^[Reference Beijersbergen, Coerwinkel, Kristensen and Woerdman^72], which is in excellent agreement with the simulation results as shown in Figure 4.

2.4 Bright γ-ray vortex emission

At the third stage, the reflected LG laser pulse collides head-on with the energetic electrons with large AM. Here, the stochastic emission model is employed and implemented in the EPOCH code using a probabilistic Monte Carlo algorithm. The QED emission rates are determined by the Lorentz-invariant parameter^[Reference Ritus^73]: ${\chi}_e=e\mathrm{\hslash}\left({m}_e^3{c}^4\right)\mid {F}_{\mu \nu}{P}^{\nu}\mid$, where ${F}_{\mu \nu}$ is the electromagnetic field tensor and ${P}^{\nu }$ is the electron four-momentum. In our configuration, ${\chi}_e$ can be expressed by . Here, ${E}_s=\left({m}_e^2{c}^3\right)/ e\mathit{\hslash}$ denotes the Schwinger electric field, is the normalized velocity of electron by the speed of light in vacuum, ${\gamma}_e$ represents the electron relativistic factor, and E and B are the electromagnetic fields. In fact, the electron trajectories deflect once the electrons collide head-on with the reflected laser pulse, agreeing well with the analysis above. As the energetic electrons counter-propagate with the reflected LG pulse, the photon emission probabilities are increased significantly and ${\chi}_e$ can be described approximately by ${\chi}_e=2{\gamma}_e\mid {E}_{\perp}\mid /{E}_s$. Figure 5(a) illustrates the spatial distribution of ${\chi}_e$ along the $x$-axis at $t=22{T}_0$. Here ${\chi}_e$ is up to 0.55, implying efficient $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon emission.

Figure 5

(a) Distributions of ${\chi}_e$ along the x-axis at $t=22{T}_0$ and (b) three-dimensional isosurface distribution of photon number density of 10 n_c at $t=24{T}_0$. The (y, z) projection plane on the left is taken at $x=18{\lambda}_0$, the (x, y) projection plane at the bottom is taken at $z=0$, and the (x, y) projection plane at the rear is taken at y = 0. (c)–(f) and (g)–(j) Transverse distributions of ${\chi}_e$ and the photon number density at different cross-sections ranging from $x=14.8{\lambda}_0$ to $15.4{\lambda}_0$ at $t=26\ {T}_0.$ The black dashed circles in (c)–(j) represent the boundaries of the micro-channel.

Figure 5(b) shows the 3D isosurface distribution of the number density of emitted $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons at $t=20{T}_0$. It is seen that the $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon beam is distinctive with a typical vortex structure in space, with few photons along the laser propagation axis. The maximum photon density is several tens of ${n}_c$. This indicates that the $\unicode{x3b3}$-rays are also LG-like, carrying AM. We will discuss this point later. In order to certify the formation of $\unicode{x3b3}$-ray, Figures 5(c)–5(f) and 5(g)–5(j) illustrate the transverse distribution of ${\chi}_e$ and the photon number density at different cross-sections ranging from $x=14.8{\lambda}_0$ to $15.4{\lambda}_0$ at $t=26{T}_0$. As expected, the larger the parameter ${\chi}_e$, the greater the $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon emission becomes. Meanwhile, the distribution of the $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons matches well with the energetic electrons as seen in Figure 2, confirming a photon beam with vortex structure in the micro-channel.

Figure 6(a) presents the evolution of energy spectra of the $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons. As ${\chi}_e$ is as high as 0.55, the photon energy estimated by^[Reference Bell and Kirk^74] $\,\mathit{\hslash \omega}\approx 0.44{\chi}_e{\unicode{x3b3}}_e{m}_e{c}^2$ in a head-on collision is approximately 76 MeV, which is consistent with the simulation results. Figure 6(b) displays the evolution of $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon brilliance (black line), instantaneous radiation power (red line), photon number (blue line), and total photon energy (green line). The photon emission occurs since $t=16{T}_0$ when the head-on collision takes place. The peak instantaneous radiation power is at $t=22{T}_0$. Here the power of radiation emitted by a single electron can be written as ${P}_{\mathrm{rad}}\approx 2e{E}_sc{\alpha}_f{\chi_e}^2g\left({\chi}_e\right)/3$, where ${\alpha}_f$ is the fine-structure constant, $g\left({\chi}_e\right)=\left[3\sqrt{3}/\left(2{\pi \chi}_e^2\right)\right]{\int}_0^{\infty }F\left({\chi}_e,{\chi}_{\unicode{x3b3}}\right)\textrm{d}{\chi}_{\unicode{x3b3} }$ is the radiation correction induced by the QED effect, and ${\chi}_{\unicode{x3b3} }=\left(\mathit{\hslash \omega }/2{m}_e{c}^2{E}_s\right)\sqrt{{\left(\textbf{E}+\textbf{k}\times \textbf{B}\right)}^2-{\left(\textbf{k}\cdot \textbf{E}\right)}^2}$ is another key quantum parameter determining the positron generation^[Reference Ritus^73, Reference Kirk, Bell and Arka^75]. For simplicity, we take^[Reference Duff, Capdessus, Sorbo, Ridgers, King and McKenna^76] $\,g\left({\chi}_e\right)=\big(3.7{\chi}_e^3+31{\chi}_e^2$ $+12{\chi}_e+1\big){}^{-4/9}$, and thus the estimated radiation power with photon energy above 0.1 MeV is approximately 5 TW, which is in reasonable agreement with our PIC simulations of averaged radiation power of 6 TW. Meanwhile, the photon brilliance reached the maximum at around $t=23{T}_0$. After the collision, the photon number still increases, but the photon energy tends to be unchanged. This indicates that the major $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon emission results from the NCS process during the collision process. Figure 6(c) shows the divergence angle of $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons (top) with photon energy $\ge 0.1$ MeV, indicating a well-directed photon beam with a small divergence angle of approximately 9°. Conservatively, we consider a $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon vortex with yield of ${10}^{10}$ at 1 MeV, full width at half maximum duration of approximately 6.6 fs, source size of around $3\;\unicode{x3bc} {\mathrm{m}}^2$, and divergence of $160\ \textrm{mrad}\times 160$ mrad. This results in a $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon vortex source with peak brilliance of approximately $1{0}^{22}$ photons·s^–1·mm^–2·mrad^–2 per 0.1% bandwidth at 1 MeV, peak instantaneous radiation power of 25 TW, averaged BAM of $1{0}^6\hslash$ /photon, and pulse energy of approximately 0.5 J. The peak intensity of the $\unicode{x3b3}$-rays is around ${10}^{20}$ W/cm${}^2$.

Figure 6

(a) Energy spectra of γ-photons at $t=19{T}_0$, $20{T}_0$, $22{T}_0$, and $28{T}_0$. (b) Evolution of the γ-photon brilliance (black), instantaneous radiation power (red), photon number (blue), and total energy (green). Here the gray area marks the collision stage. (c) Divergence angle of γ-photons (top) at $t=19{T}_0$, $20{T}_0$, $22{T}_0$, and $28{T}_0$. Here the bottom shows the angular-energy distribution of $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons at $t=28{T}_0$.

2.5 AM transfer from laser to $\ \gamma$-photons

Exploring the laser AM transfer to charged particles and photons is of significance for understanding the dynamics of laser–plasma interaction at high laser intensity. When a laser beam carrying nonzero AM impinges on plasma, its AM can be transferred to plasma ions and electrons, thus setting them in rotational motion. This occurs both with SAM and OAM. As we know, each photon carries $\hslash$ or –$\hslash$ SAM. To get a powerful AM source, we use an ultra-intense CP Gaussian laser in our scheme. Once the intense CP laser pulse interacts with a micro-channel target, its SAM can be transferred to electrons and ions, and finally to the $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons via the NCS process. Here, the total AM of the incident CP laser pulse can be calculated exactly by

(4)$$\begin{align}{\textbf{L}}_{\mathrm{laser}}={\varepsilon}_0\int \textbf{r}\times \left(\textbf{E}\times \textbf{B}\right)\mathrm{d}v,\end{align}$$

where $\mathbf{r}$ is the grid’s position, and $\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ are the corresponding electromagnetic fields in each grid. The BAM of particles with respect to the laser axis is defined by

(5)$${\mathbf{L}}_{e,C,H,\unicode{x3b3} }=\sum \limits_i\left({\mathbf{r}}_i\times {\mathbf{p}}_i\right).$$

Here the subscript i denotes the serial number of individual particles. The photons’ momentum originates from the parent electrons, the averaged momentum can be scaled as^[Reference Zhu, Chen, Yu, Weng, Hu, McKenna and Sheng^77] ${\ \overline{p}}_{\unicode{x3b3}}\propto {\chi}_e^2g\left({\chi}_e\right)$. One can thus estimate the photon AM as ${L}_{\unicode{x3b3}}\propto {N}_{\unicode{x3b3} }{\overline{r}}_{\unicode{x3b3} }{\overline{p}}_{\unicode{x3b3}}\propto {N}_{\unicode{x3b3} }{\overline{r}}_{\unicode{x3b3} }{\chi}_e^2g\left({\chi}_e\right)$, where ${N}_{\unicode{x3b3} }$ and ${\overline{r}}_{\unicode{x3b3} }$ are the yield and the average off-axis radius of photons. Figures 7(a) and 7(b) show the evolution of the particles’ BAM and the laser energy conversion efficiency to charge particles and $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons. At the first stage, the CP laser pulse accelerates the electrons in the micro-channel and transfers its SAM to the energetic electrons, so that the electrons’ BAM and energy increase. At the second stage, the light fan modifies the wave front by adding exp(ilϕ) to the phase of the drive. Thus, the electron BAM increases more sharply during the collision stage, because the reflected pulse is also able to transfer its AM to the electrons via the NCS process^[Reference Zhu, Yu, Chen, Weng and Sheng^52]. However, due to the photon emission and radiation reaction effect, the total energy of electrons keeps unchanged until the collision stage is completed. During the process, the carbon ions and protons occupy only very small AM as compared with the electrons. The final laser energy conversion efficiencies to electrons and photons are around 20% and 1.2%, respectively. We define the laser AM conversion efficiency to the $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons as ${\rho}_{\mathrm{AM}}=\frac{\sum_{i,\unicode{x3b3}}\mid {\textbf{r}}_{i,\unicode{x3b3}}\times {\textbf{p}}_{i,\unicode{x3b3}}\mid }{\mid {\varepsilon}_0\int \textbf{r}\times \left(\textbf{E}\times \textbf{B}\right)\mathrm{d}v\mid }$. Owing to the collective effect of the high-energy $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons emitted in the micro-channel, we summarize AM of all these photons and divide it by the total laser AM. The AM conversion efficiency from laser to $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons is unprecedentedly 0.67$\%$, which is nearly seven times higher than that of the scheme in Ref. [Reference Feng, Qin, Geng, Yu, Wang, Wu, Yan, Ji and Shen78]. Such an efficient multi-MeV $\unicode{x3b3}$-photon vortex source would offer exciting potential capabilities and opportunities for diverse studies, such as the investigation of the AM transfer by Kerr black holes^[Reference Tamburini, Thidé, Molina-Terriza and Anzolin^23, Reference Harwit^24]. For example, it may be common in the universe to generate vortex photons by high-energy electrons interacting with CP electromagnetic waves. These phenomena tend to be found easily in some astrophysical environments, e.g., in the vicinity of magnetized near neutron stars and in turbulent plasma in astrophysical jets, which have attracted the attention of numerous researchers^[Reference Tamburini, Thidé, Molina-Terriza and Anzolin^23, Reference Harwit^24, Reference Taira and Katoh^27, Reference Katoh, Fujimoto, Kawaguchi, Tsuchiya, Ohmi, Kaneyasu, Taira, Hosaka, Mochihashi and Takashima^57]. Our scheme shows a possible way to study the photon vortex generation in the universe by laser–plasma interactions.

Figure 7

(a) Evolution of BAM of electrons (black arrow), protons (blue arrow), carbon ions (green arrow), and $\unicode{x3b3}$-photons (red arrow). (b) Evolution of laser energy conversion efficiency to electrons (black arrow), protons (blue arrow), carbon ions (green arrow), and $\unicode{x3b3}$-protons (red arrow). Here the gray area denotes the collision stage and the arrows indicate the y axes of different curves.