In the revision of Retrophyllum published in a previous issue of the Edinburgh Journal of Botany, the barcode for the specimen designated on page 208 line 10 as lectotype of Retrophyllum minus (Carrière) C.N. Page was incorrectly given as P00118110 instead of P00188110. The text should read:
Lectotype designated here: New Caledonia, Yaté, “bord du Lac Arnaud”, Vieillard 1275 (P: sheet barcoded P00188110, top left sterile specimen, here designated 110-A: see Appendix I).
There are several other instances in the paper where Paris herbarium barcodes correctly ‘P00188XXX’ were given as ‘P00118XXX’, as follows.
Page 242, line 19: ‘P00118111’ should read ‘P00188111’.
Page 242, line 26: ‘P00118108–110’ should read ‘P00188108–110’.
Page 242, line 27: ‘P00118111’ should read ‘P00188111’.
Page 250, penultimate line: ‘P00118106’ should read ‘P00188106’.
Page 251, line 11: ‘P00118107’ should read ‘P00188107’.
Page 253, line 26: ‘P00118110’ should read ‘P00188110’.
Page 254, line 1: ‘P00118111’ should read ‘P00188111’.
Page 254, line 20: ‘P00118108’ should read ‘P00188108’.
