Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T02:17:10.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Miniature antenna for GNSS satellite constellation reception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2025

Karim Kouny*
Affiliation:
Universite de Brest, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, Brest Cedex 3, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Valentin Lourenco Martins
Affiliation:
DEMR, ONERA, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France Institut d’Electronique et des Technologies du numeRique (IETR), UMR CNRS 6164, INSA Rennes, Rennes, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Hassan Bouazzaoui
Affiliation:
Universite de Brest, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, Brest Cedex 3, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Noham Martin
Affiliation:
Universite de Brest, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, Brest Cedex 3, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Fabien Ferrero
Affiliation:
CNRS/LEAT, Universite Cote d’Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France
Guillaume Ferre
Affiliation:
IMS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, CNRS, Talence, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
Anthony Ghiotto
Affiliation:
IMS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, CNRS, Talence, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
*
Corresponding author: Karim Kouny; Email: karim.kouny@outlook.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the design, simulation, and real-world validation of a compact, dual-band, right-hand circularly polarized antenna for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications. The antenna operates in the L1 (1575 MHz) and L5 (1176 MHz) bands, utilizing a stacked patch structure on low-cost FR4 substrates to achieve compactness and circular polarization. The design ensures axial ratio values below 3 dB, with peak gains of 2.59 dBi (L1) and -0.89 dBi (L5), while maintaining wide radiation coverage. Unlike many recent proposals based on Rogers substrates or complex geometries, our design focuses on cost-effectiveness and manufacturing simplicity. The prototype was validated using a Quectel LC29HAAMD GNSS receiver during the 2024 French National Microwaves Days (JNM), successfully acquiring over 40 satellites within 60 seconds in a real-world suburban environment. These results demonstrate the antenna’s suitability for space-constrained and low-cost GNSS platforms in the “New Space” era.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.
Figure 0

Figure 1. 1/2 final fight – antenna from CROMA PhD students (Grenoble) vs the antenna from the XLIM PhD student (Limoges).

Figure 1

Table 1. Specifications of the L-band GNSS reception antenna.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Simulated antenna with Ansys HFSS software, (a) side view, (b) top view, and (c) isometric view as proposed in [6].

Figure 3

Figure 3. Different parts of the antenna, including the connector and screws used to adhere the two parts together

Figure 4

Table 2. Geometric parameters

Figure 5

Figure 4. Simulated surface currents distribution at 1.176 GHz. (a) 0. (b) 90. (c) 180. (d) 270. (e) Colorbar.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Simulated surface currents distribution at 1.575 GHz. (a) 0. (b) 90. (c) 180. (d) 270. (e) Colorbar.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Simulated radiation pattern for ϕ = 0 at the center frequency (continuous/dotted lines correspond respectively to co-polarization/cross-polarization).

Figure 8

Figure 7. Comparison between simulated and measured return loss.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Simulated axial ratio (dB) as a function of the angle theta.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Performance over frequency. (a) Axial ratios ($\theta=0;\phi=0$). (b) Efficiencies.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Evolution of return loss with substrate height tolerance.

Figure 12

Table 3. Comparison with existing GNSS antenna designs