Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T08:14:34.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can we improve the nutritional quality of meat?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2017

Nigel D. Scollan*
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Food Security, Queens University Belfast, Stranmillis Road, Belfast BT95HN, UK
Eleri M. Price
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, UK
Sarah A. Morgan
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, UK
Sharon A. Huws
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, UK
Kevin J. Shingfield
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3EB, UK
*
* Corresponding author: N. D. Scollan, email Nigel.Scollan@qub.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The nutritional value of meat is an increasingly important factor influencing consumer preferences for poultry, red meat and processed meat products. Intramuscular fat content and composition, in addition to high quality protein, trace minerals and vitamins are important determinants of nutritional value. Fat content of meat at retail has decreased substantially over the past 40 years through advances in animal genetics, nutrition and management and changes in processing techniques. Evidence of the association between diet and the incidence of human non-communicable diseases has driven an interest in developing production systems for lowering total SFA and trans fatty acid (TFA) content and enrichment of n-3 PUFA concentrations in meat and meat products. Typically, poultry and pork has a lower fat content, containing higher PUFA and lower TFA concentrations than lamb or beef. Animal genetics, nutrition and maturity, coupled with their rumen microbiome, are the main factors influencing tissue lipid content and relative proportions of SFA, MUFA and PUFA. Altering the fatty acid (FA) profile of lamb and beef is determined to a large extent by extensive plant and microbial lipolysis and subsequent microbial biohydrogenation of dietary lipid in the rumen, and one of the major reasons explaining the differences in lipid composition of meat from monogastrics and ruminants. Nutritional strategies can be used to align the fat content and FA composition of poultry, pork, lamb and beef with Public Health Guidelines for lowering the social and economic burden of chronic disease.

Information

Type
Conference on ‘The future of animal products in the human diet: health and environmental concerns’
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1. Effect of dietary lipid supplements on the PUFA content of pork (mg/100 g)

Figure 1

Table 2. Effect of diet on the fatty acid (FA) content of chicken breast (mg/100 g)

Figure 2

Table 3. Effect of diet on the fatty acid (FA) composition of beef (mg/100 g)

Figure 3

Table 4. Effect of diet on the fatty acid (FA) content of lamb (mg/100 g)

Figure 4

Table 5. Effect of diet on the trans 18 : 1 content of beef and lamb (mg/100 g)