Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T11:38:13.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regime shifts and heterogeneous trends in malaria time series from Western Kenya Highlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

LUIS FERNANDO CHAVES*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Environmental Sciences and Global Center of Excellence Program on Integrated Field Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan Programa de Investigación en Enfermedades Tropicales, Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional, Heredia, Costa Rica
MASAHIRO HASHIZUME
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN) and Global Center of Excellence Program on Tropical and Emergent Infectious Diseases, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
AKIKO SATAKE
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Environmental Sciences and Global Center of Excellence Program on Integrated Field Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
NOBORU MINAKAWA
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Medicine (NEKKEN) and Global Center of Excellence Program on Tropical and Emergent Infectious Diseases, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Graduate School of Environmental Sciences, Hokkaido University, Suite A701, Kita-10, Nishi-5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkai-do, 060-0810Japan. Tel: +81 11 706 2267. Fax: +81 11 706 4954. E-mail: lchaves@ees.hokudai.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Large malaria epidemics in the East African highlands during the mid and late 1990s kindled a stream of research on the role that global warming might have on malaria transmission. Most of the inferences using temporal information have been derived from a malaria incidence time series from Kericho. Here, we report a detailed analysis of 5 monthly time series, between 15 and 41 years long, from West Kenya encompassing an altitudinal gradient along Lake Victoria basin. We found decreasing, but heterogeneous, malaria trends since the late 1980s at low altitudes (<1600 m), and the early 2000s at high altitudes (>1600 m). Regime shifts were present in 3 of the series and were synchronous in the 2 time series from high altitudes. At low altitude, regime shifts were associated with a shift from increasing to decreasing malaria transmission, as well as a decrease in variability. At higher altitudes, regime shifts reflected an increase in malaria transmission variability. The heterogeneity in malaria trends probably reflects the multitude of factors that can drive malaria transmission and highlights the need for both spatially and temporally fine-grained data to make sound inferences about the impacts of climate change and control/elimination interventions on malaria transmission.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/>. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Data. (A) Hospital locations. Clinical records of malaria infections for: (B) Maseno (May 1935, November 2009, 0°00′15″S, 34°36′16″E, Altitude=1500 m); (C) Kendu Bay (January 1980, November 2006, 0°24′05″S, 34°39′56″E, Altitude=1240 m); (D) Kisii (January 1986, December 2000, 0°40′S, 34°46′E, Altitude=1670 m); (E) Kapsabet (January 1980, December 1999, 0°12′N, 35°06′E, Altitude=2000 m); (F) Kericho (April 1965, November 2006, 0°23′55″N, 35°15′30″E, Altitude=2000 m). Rainfall in: (G) Kisumu (January 1980, December 2006, 0°6′S 34°45′E Atltitude=1131 m); (H) Kisii (January, 1986, December 2000); (I) Kapsabet (January 1980, December 2000); (J) Kericho (January 1966, December 2006). (K) Dipole mode index (January 1966, December 2008) and (L) Niño 3 index (January 1966, December 2008). In panel (A), elevation is measured in meters, m, and indicated by grey. Location color indicates the data available at each site; blue (rainfall); green (disease) and red (disease and rainfall). In panel (B) Blue indicates inputed values (see methods for details).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Autocorrelation (ACF) and cross-correlation functions (CCF) (A) Maseno malaria ACF; (B) Maseno malaria and Kisumu rainfall CCF; (C) Maseno malaria and Dipole mode index, DMI, CCF; (D) Maseno malaria and the Niño 3 index, ENSO; (E) Kendu Bay malaria ACF; (F) Kendu Bay malaria and Kisumu rainfall CCF; (G) Kendu Bay malaria and DMI CCF; (H) Kendu Bay and ENSO CCF; (I) Kisii malaria ACF; (J) Kisii malaria and rainfall CCF; (K) Kisii malaria and DMI CCF; (L) Kisii malaria and ENSO CCC; (M) Kapsabet malaria ACF; (N) Kapsabet and rainfall CCF; (O) Kapsabet malaria and DMI CCF; (P) Kapsabet malaria and ENSO CCF; (Q) Kericho malaria ACF; (R) Kericho malaria and rainfall CCF; (S) Kericho malaria and DMI CCF; (T) Kericho malaria and ENSO CCF. In the x axis of all plots lag=1 means 12 months, dashed lines indicate the 95% confidence limits within which the ACFs and CCFs are not different from what is expected by random.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Breakpoints for malaria incidence and rainfall time series. (A) Empirical fluctuation process, EFP, for Maseno malaria time series, as a seasonal autoregressive process with a non-linear trend, the dashed line indicates the most likely breakpoint, May 1989 (RE=1·80, P<0·01); (B) EFP for Kendu Bay malaria time series as a seasonal autoregressive process with a non-linear trend, no indications of breakpoints (RE=1·67, P>0·05); (C) EFP for Kisii as a first order seasonal second order autoregressive process with a non-linear trend, the dashed line indicates the most likely breakpoint, January 1998 (RE=1·66, P<0·047); (D) EFP for Kapsabet, as a seasonal autoregressive process with a non-linear trend, no indications of breakpoints, (RE=1·60, P>0·05); (E) EFP for Kericho as a first order seasonal second-order autoregressive process with a non-linear trend, the dashed line indicates the most likely breakpoint, June 1997(RE=2·93, P<10−7); (F) Empirical fluctuation process, EFP, for Kisumu rainfall (RE=1·06, P<0·21); (G) EFP Kisii rainfall (RE=0·73, P<0·66); (H) EFP Kapsabet rainfall (RE=0·80, P<0·54); (I) EFP Kericho (RE=0·64, P<0·80). In all panels when values exceed the outer solid lines is an indication of a regime shift. In all panels the outer lines correspond to the extreme values expected if changes in the coefficients are driven by a random walk.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Malaria trends obtained with Loess. (A) Maseno (B) Kissi (C) Kericho (D) Kendu Bay and Kapsabet. In all panels continuous lines indicate continuous trends. In panels (A), (B) and (C), the dotted lines indicate split trends.

Figure 4

Table 1. Model Selection

(Time series indicates the malaria time series, autoregressive components indicate the number of ordinary and seasonal autoregressive components respectively. Covariates indicate the different covariates with the respective lag, in months, within parenthesis: Trend is the non-linear trend obtained using loess, Rainfall, the local rainfall (in Maseno and Kendu Bay, rainfall from Kisumu was used as a proxy); ENSO, the Niño 3 index, and DMI, the dipole mode index. Breakpoint indicates whether a breakpoint was considered (Y) or not (N) and AIC indicates the Akaike Information criterion, highlighted values show the best models (minimum AIC).)
Figure 5

Table 2. Parameter estimates

(Time series indicates the malaria time series. Parameter indicates the predictor for which the parameter was estimated: Mean is the mean value of the series, AR and SAR are, respectively, ordinary and seasonal autoregressive predictors, Trend is the non-linear trend obtained with loess, Rainfall is the local rainfall (Kisumu rainfall for Maseno and Kendu Bay). The value inside the parenthesis indicates the lag of the covariates (in months). No shift presents estimates for models without breakpoints. Before and After present, respectively, estimates before and after the breakpoints. P (