Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jhf8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-03T05:15:56.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plasma formation with regulated electric potential distribution in SMOLA helical mirror device

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2025

Viktor O. Ustyuzhanin*
Affiliation:
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
Ivan A. Ivanov
Affiliation:
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
Anna A. Inzhevatkina
Affiliation:
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
Anton V. Sudnikov
Affiliation:
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia
*
Corresponding author: Viktor O. Ustyuzhanin, V.O.Ustyuzhanin@inp.nsk.su

Abstract

This paper presents experimental results from the SMOLA device, constructed at the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, to verify the concept of helical mirror confinement. The experiments discussed focus on collision regimes and plasma rotation in the transport section, controlled primarily by the axisymmetric plasma gun. The plasma gun of the SMOLA comprises a lanthanum hexaboride cathode, a hollow copper anode and magnetic coils, forming a magnetron discharge with a high degree of ionisation and a radial electric field for ${\textbf{E}} \boldsymbol{\times} {\textbf{B}}$ drift. Ion collisionality is adjustable from collisional to collisionless via magnetic configuration and gas feed of the plasma gun. The main processes in collisions are the ion–ion binary collisions. Electric potential radial distribution, governed by discharge voltage, the anode geometry and its potential, enables ${\textbf{E}} \boldsymbol{\times} {\textbf{B}}$ plasma rotation such that the axial magnetic mirrors velocity in the rotating plasma reference frame can be comparable to the ion thermal velocity ($V_Z \geqslant V_{T_i}$), which realises conditions for effective plasma confinement.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. SMOLA device configuration. Positions of the diagnostics are indicated. Here, z is the axial coordinate measured from the plasma source exit. (a) Layout of the SMOLA helical mirror. (b) Axial magnetic field distribution.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Plasma source geometry with main power supply diagramm. 1, LaB$_6$ cathode; 2, copper anode; 3, magnetic field coils; 4, floating diaphragms; 5, gas feeding system; 6, magnetic field lines; 7, limiter in entrance of the transport section; 8, limiter after the transport section; 9, radial segmented plasma endplate; K$_1$, K$_2$ and K$_3$, the IGBT transistors; the red rings, Hall probes.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Typical plasma pulse in the SMOLA device. 1, cathode heating; 2, current in the magnetic coils; 3, cathode potential; 4, full discharge current; 5, fast gas valve; 6, slow gas valve. Green area corresponds to the stationary phase of the discharge for probe measurements.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Typical radial distribution of the plasma parameters in the confinement zone. Power of the discharge 40 kW, $J_{\textrm{gas}}=40$ eq.A, $B_c/B_a=2.67$. Data are measured by the double probe at z = 0.4 m.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Plasma density relation with puffing gas in the CZ (z = 0.4 m) and the TS (z = 2.04 m) at different discharge power. Density is measured on the axis.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Radial profiles of the ion density and the electron temperature at different cathode–anode magnetic field relation (the anode magnetic insulation) at constant gas feeding and power supply in the confinement zone (z = 0.4 m). (a) Ion density profile, (b) electron density profile.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Collisionality in the transport section over the entire range of gas feeding. Blue, entrance of the transport part; red, exit of the transport section. The discharge power is 40 kW.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Plasma-gas density ratio in the confinement zone (z = 0.4 m). Dark blue circle, discharge power 20 kW; green square, 40 kW; blue triangle, experimental mode without floating diaphragms with 30 kW discharge power. Density is measured on the axis.

Figure 8

Table 1. Mean free path of the most important processes.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Radial distribution of the electric potential and the radial field in the plasma. Data are measured by the double emissive probe in the confinement zone (z = 0.4 m).

Figure 10

Figure 10. Axial distribution of the electric potential in the SMOLA device. Probes are located on the axis.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Radial electric field distribution at varied cathode potential. Data are measured at z = 0.4 m.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Dynamics of the currents in each electrode without the plasma dump in the modes with grounded LA and biasing LA. The limiters are grounded.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Discharge current at different anode biasing with regulated cathode–anode magnetic field ratio.

Figure 14

Figure 14. Radial distribution of the radial electric field in the LA mode with negative biasing and the grounded LA mode in the confinement zone (z = 0.4 m).

Figure 15

Figure 15. Radial distribution of the radial electric field in the LA mode with negative biasing (example radial profile at $U_{\textrm{an}}=-80 \,\mathrm{V}$) and different anode’s magnetic insulation in the confinement zone (z = 0.4 m).