Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-zzw9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T19:07:25.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distinguishing Between Darts and Arrows in the Archaeological Record: Implications for Technological Change in the American West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William R. Hildebrandt
Affiliation:
Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Del Rio Place, Suite A, Davis, California 95618 (billh@farwestern.com)
Jerome H. King
Affiliation:
Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Del Rio Place, Suite A, Davis, California 95618

Abstract

We propose a new method for differentiating archaeological atlatl darts from arrow points. Our dart-arrow index accurately distinguishes known (hafted) archaeological examples of darts and arrows. We find that ethnographic collections of hafted arrows used by previous researchers are problematic, and should not be used as control samples for differentiating darts from arrows. We use the dart-arrow index to reassess the projectile points described by Ames et al. (2010). The analysis shows that Hatwai Eared (4400–2800 B.P.) and Cascade (8500–4500 B.P.) points were darts, not arrows as Ames et al. argue, and that a major revision of the history of bow-and-arrow technology in western North America is unnecessary.

Resumen

Resumen

Proponemos un nuevo método para diferenciar los dardos de atlatl de las puntas de flecha. El índice dardo-flecha distingue con precisión entre los ejemplares arqueológicos conocidos (con mango) de dardos y de flechas. En muchos aspectos, las colecciones etnográficas de flechas con mango son problemáticas, y no se deben de utilizar como muestras de testigo para distinguir entre los dardos y las flechas. Utilizamos el índice dardo-flecha en una reevaluación de las puntas de proyectil deseritas por Ames et al. (2010). Sostenemos que las puntas tipo Hatwai Eared (4400–2800 B.P.) y Cascade (8500–4500 B.P.) eran puntas de dardos, y no de flechas como argumentan Ames et al. Como consecuencia, no es necesaria una revisión mayor de la historia de la tecnología del arco y la flecha en el oeste de América del Norte.

Information

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable