Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T08:29:40.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cryoconite ecosystem on the Greenland ice sheet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Andy Hodson
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK E-mail: a.j.hodson@sheffield.ac.uk
Carl Bøggild
Affiliation:
The University Centre in Svalbard (UNIS), PO Box 156, NO-9171 Longyearbyen, Norway
Edward Hanna
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK E-mail: a.j.hodson@sheffield.ac.uk
Phillipe Huybrechts
Affiliation:
Earth System Sciences & Department of Geography, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Harry Langford
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK E-mail: a.j.hodson@sheffield.ac.uk
Karen Cameron
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK E-mail: a.j.hodson@sheffield.ac.uk
Alexandra Houldsworth
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Sheffield, Winter Street, Sheffield S10 2TN, UK E-mail: a.j.hodson@sheffield.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents an assessment of biological activity associated with ice surface debris (cryoconite) at the ice-sheet scale. Estimates of the mass distribution of cryoconite over the Greenland ice sheet (GIS) and the biological activity associated with it are presented and then coupled with a surface mass-balance model to estimate total carbon fluxes due to respiration and photosynthesis. We find an average loading of 66gm−2 at Kangerlussuaq, southwest Greenland, which compares well with recent estimates from Kronprins Christians Land (17–440 gm−2: Bøggild and others, 2010) in northeast Greenland. We also report a significant microbial biomass in cryoconite at both these places (103–104 cells mg−1) and carbon fluxes of the order of 1–3 μM C g−1d−1 for both respiration and photosynthesis. The modelling indicates that total respiration and photosynthesis fluxes are likely to be ∼101–102 GgCa−1 and thus far from trivial. However, estimation of the net ecosystem impact across the entire ice sheet on atmospheric CO2 concentrations is problematic because photosynthesis rates were almost certainly low during our field campaign. Therefore, like its water balance, the carbon balance of the GIS is now known to be important, but its accurate quantification will remain elusive until more data are forthcoming.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © the Author(s) [year] 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Notable observations of cryoconite upon the GIS. 1–5 represent multiple traverses by the explorers named in the legend (see Hobbs, 1910). Also shown are Nordenskiöld’s study area (No), Thule Ramp (T), Sermikavsak (S), the KG (KG) and KPCL (KP) transects, Steinböck’s study area (D) and Zackenberg (Z). The bare ice zone and the slush zone, where biological activity is most likely, are also shown after Janssens and Huybrechts (2000).

Figure 1

Table 1. Cryoconite hole characteristics for Kronprins Christians Land (KPCL), Kangerlussuaq (KG) and Thule Ramp. Values in parentheses are the number of observations. ‘Mass per unit hole area’ refers to the dry mass of entire cryoconite holes of different areas (see Methods)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Evolution of the blank and occupied cryoconite holes: (a) depths and O2 difference; (b) cumulative dissolved O2 difference and O2 supply from hole deepening, along with daily net ecosystem production (negative values indicate net respiration).

Figure 3

Table 2. Respiration (RO2 , RTDIC), net ecosystem production (NEPO2 , NEPTDIC) and photosynthesis (PPO2 , PPTDIC) according to dissolved O2 and TDIC changes, respectively. BI denotes data for the blue ice zone and M for the marginal ice zone. OH is the occupied hole, RS is the 4 day dark incubation at 2°C, IR is the average incident radiation throughout the incubations and d the duration in days. The end dates (in 2008) of the incubations are shown in parentheses, and negative NEP values show an excess of respiration over photosynthesis

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Incubation results showing the values for respiration (R) and photosynthesis (PP) deduced from changes in dissolved O2 (x-axis) and TDIC (y-axis). Legend: ‘glacier’ denotes the in situ incubations conducted at both the blue ice zone and the marginal zone (the latter plotting at the origin of the graph); ‘incubator’ denotes the 4 day dark incubation study.

Figure 5

Table 3. Annual carbon fluxes (inGgCa−1) for respiration in snow and bare ice habitats (CRsnow and CRice) and photosynthesis upon bare ice (CPice and MaxCPice). NEP I is (CPice – CRice – CRsnow) and NEP II is (MaxCPice – CRice – CRsnow)