Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-tq7bh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T12:26:08.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Frequent use of selected sugary products associates with thinness, but not overweight during preadolescence: a cross-sectional study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2020

Sohvi Lommi
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland Folkhälsan Research Center, 00250 Helsinki, Finland
Rejane Augusta de Oliveira Figueiredo
Affiliation:
Folkhälsan Research Center, 00250 Helsinki, Finland Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Hely Tuorila
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
Heli Viljakainen*
Affiliation:
Folkhälsan Research Center, 00250 Helsinki, Finland Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
*
*Corresponding author: Heli Viljakainen, email heli.viljakainen@helsinki.fi
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Convincing evidence suggests that diets laden with added sugar, specifically sugar-sweetened beverages, associate with excess weight in children. The relationships between sugar consumption frequency and BMI remain less well studied. We, therefore, evaluated children’s consumption frequency of selected sugary products (n 8461; mean age 11·1 (sd 0·9) years) selected from the Finnish Health in Teens cohort study. Using a sixteen-item FFQ including six sugary products (chocolate/sweets, biscuits/cookies, ice cream, sweet pastry, sugary juice drinks and sugary soft drinks), we calculated a Sweet Treat Index (STI) for the frequency of weekly sugary product consumption and categorised children based on quartiles (Q) into low (Q1, cut-off < 4·0), medium (Q2 + Q3, range 4·0–10·5) and high STI (Q4, cut-off > 10·5), and as thin, normal and overweight/obese based on the measured BMI. Through multinomial logistic regression analyses, we found that subjects with a high STI exhibited a higher risk of being thin (OR 1·20, 95 % CI 1·02, 1·41) and lower risk of being overweight (OR 0·79, 95 % CI 0·67, 0·92), while subjects with a low STI were at higher risk of being overweight (OR 1·32, 95 % CI 1·14, 1·53). High consumption frequencies of salty snacks, pizza and hamburgers most closely were associated with a high STI. Our findings suggest that consuming sugary products at a high frequency does not associate with being overweight. The relationship between a low consumption frequency and being overweight suggests that overweight children’s consumption frequency of sugary products may be controlled, restricted or underreported.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Authors 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Spearman coefficients of the correlation between the Sweet Treat Index (STI) and individual food items included in the index

Figure 1

Table 2. Children’s characteristics according to BMI categories (n 8461)*(Numbers and percentages)

Figure 2

Table 3. Distribution of lifestyle factors and food item frequencies by Sweet Treat Index (STI) groups (n 8461)(Numbers and percentages)

Figure 3

Table 4. Sweet Treat Index (STI) related to BMI, compared with normal weight, among all subjects (n 8461)*(Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 4

Fig. 1. OR and 95 % CI for the Sweet Treat Index (STI) related to the BMI categories, compared with normal weight, stratified by sleep groups (a, b and c). Results from multinomial logistic regression. Model is adjusted for sex, age, maternal socio-economic status and physical activity. The group ‘overweight’ includes obese subjects. (a) Sleep, less than recommended (n 689); (b) sleep, recommended (n 7606); (c) sleep, more than recommended (n 166).