Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kn6lq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T12:54:42.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of two whole-grain barley varieties on caecal SCFA, gut microbiota and plasma inflammatory markers in rats consuming low- and high-fat diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2015

Yadong Zhong*
Affiliation:
Food for Health Science Centre, Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Kemicentrum, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Nittaya Marungruang
Affiliation:
Food for Health Science Centre, Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Kemicentrum, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Frida Fåk
Affiliation:
Food for Health Science Centre, Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Kemicentrum, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Margareta Nyman
Affiliation:
Food for Health Science Centre, Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Kemicentrum, Lund University, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
*
* Corresponding author: Y. Zhong, fax +46 46 222 4532, email Yadong.Zhong@food-health-science.lu.se
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mixed-linkage β-glucans are fermented by the colon microbiota that give rise to SCFA. Propionic and butyric acids have been found to play an important role in colonic health, as well as they may have extraintestinal metabolic effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate how two whole-grain barley varieties differing in dietary fibre and β-glucan content affected caecal SCFA, gut microbiota and some plasma inflammatory markers in rats consuming low-fat (LF) or high-fat (HF) diets. Barley increased the caecal pool of SCFA in rats fed the LF and HF diets compared with those fed the control diet, and the effect was generally dependent on fibre content, an exception was butyric acid in the LF setting. Furthermore, whole-grain barley reduced plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, increased the caecal abundance of Lactobacillus and decreased the Bacteroides fragilis group, but increased the number of Bifidobacterium only when dietary fat was consumed at a low level. Fat content influenced the effects of barley: rats fed the HF diets had a higher caecal pool of acetic and propionic acids, higher concentrations of amino acids and higher amounts of lipids in the portal plasma and liver than rats fed the LF diets; however, less amounts of butyric acid were generally formed. Interestingly, there was an increase in the caecal abundance of Akkermansia and the caecal pool of succinic acid, and a decrease in the proportion of Bifidobacterium and the Clostridium leptum group. In summary, whole-grain barley decreased HF diet-induced inflammation, which was possibly related to the formation of SCFA and changes in microbiota composition. High β-glucan content in the diet was associated with reduced plasma cholesterol levels.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Dietary fibre content (g/100 g, dry-weight basis), soluble fraction (%) and composition (% of dietary fibre polysaccharides) in microcrystalline cellulose (MCC, FMC BioPolymer; control), Hadm and SW barley (Mean values with their standard errors or percentages, n 2)

Figure 1

Table 2 Feed intake (g/rat per d), body-weight gain per initial body weight (%), body-weight gain per feed (g/g feed), caecal content (g), tissue weight (g) and pH, spleen weight (g), fresh and dry liver weight (g), and epididymal and retroperitoneal fat weight (g) in rats given two barley varieties (Hadm and SW) or a control diet at a low and high fat content for 25 d (Mean values with their standard errors, n 7)

Figure 2

Table 3 Carboxylic acids in the caecum (μmol or μmol/g), distal colon (μmol/g) and portal serum (μmol/l) of rats given two barley varieties (Hadm and SW) or a control diet at a low and high fat content for 25 d (Mean values with their standard errors; n 7 except for high fat control portal serum samples (n 6))

Figure 3

Table 4 Concentrations of free amino acids and ammonia in the portal plasma (μmol/l) in rats fed two barley varieties (Hadm and SW) or a control diet at a low and high fat content for 25 d (Mean values with their standard errors; n 7 except for control (high and low fat) portal plasma samples (n 6))

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Effects of two barley varieties and dietary fibre levels on (A) caecal microbiota, (B) lipids in blood and liver, and (C) plasma lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in rats fed low-fat () and high-fat () diets. n 7 rats per group, except n 6 for (B, C) control high-fat samples (plasma) and (C) SW high fat samples. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis). Total bacteria, Pfibre>0·1, Pfat< 0·001; Lactobacillus, Pfibre= 0·016, Pfat< 0·001; Bacteroides fragilis group, Pfibre= 0·002, Pfat>0·1; plasma cholesterol, Pfibre>0·1, Pfat< 0·001; plasma TAG, Pfibre>0·1, Pfat= 0·099; LBP, Pfibre< 0·001, Pfat< 0·001; MCP-1, Pfibre= 0·03, Pfat>0·1. C. leptum, Clostridium leptum.

Figure 5

Fig. 2 Bi-plot of principal component analysis. The location of each triangle (, low-fat control (LF-control); , LF-50Hadm; , LF-Hadm; , LF-SW) and circle (, high-fat control (HF-control); , HF-50Hadm; , HF-Hadm; , HF-SW) is based on the collection of all investigated parameters (n 81) in each rat. represents experimental parameters analysed in the present study, and for graphical presentation, only selected ones are shown. Red-green frame, control; green frame, barley-LF; red frame, barley-HF. indicates the classification of rats fed the LF or HF diets. C. leptum, Clostridium leptum; B. fragilis, Bacteroides fragilis; LBP, lipopolysaccharide-binding protein; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. R2x(1) = 0·342; R2x(2) = 0·179.

Supplementary material: File

Zhong supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Zhong supplementary material(File)
File 58.4 KB