Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-30T11:58:49.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The oldest larval crinoid: pentacrinoid stage crinoid from the Cannifton Quarry Lagerstätte (Ordovician, Katian) of Ontario, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2026

William I. Ausich*
Affiliation:
School of Earch Sciences, The Ohio State University , Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
Steven W. Hetrick
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, Virginia 22802, USA
Stephen A. Leslie
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Environmental Science, James Madison University , Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA
*
Corresponding author: William I. Ausich; Email: ausich.1@osu.edu

Abstract

The geologically oldest known crinoid pentacrinoid larva is reported from Verulam Formation (Katian) from the Lafarge Cannifton Agg Quarry in Cannifton, Ontario, Canada. The entire specimen (arms, aboral cup, and incomplete column) is ~4.2 mm high with the aboral cup only ~1.3 mm high. The specimen is comparable in size to the early pentacrinoid larva of the living crinoid Metacrinus rotundatus Carpenter, 1885. As known, the morphology of this pentacrinoid larva does not correspond in all details with any adult crinoid in the Cannifton area or from the nearby Brechin Lagerstätte fauna, suggesting that considerable morphological change occurred during ontogeny of this taxon.

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press or the rights holder(s) must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society

Non-technical Summary

Because of the low likelihood of preservation and collection, few larval and juvenile specimens of extinct crinoids are known. This substantially hinders our understanding of crinoid ontogeny, which can in turn limit our understanding of the evolutionary history of crinoids. Reported herein is an exceedingly small (aboral cup ~1.3 mm high) crinoid larva from Ordovician strata of southern Ontario, Canada. This new specimen is comparable in size and developmental stage to an early pentacrinoid larva of living crinoids. It is also the geologically oldest crinoid larva known.

Introduction

Understanding the adult morphology of organisms is essential for describing taxa and delineating the evolutionary history of life. In many groups, very little is known about morphologic change during the ontogeny of individual species, which in many cases can be an obstacle to framing homology statements in adults.

Larval and juvenile crinoids are very rare in the fossil record, which is undoubtedly the consequence of both collection bias and taphonomy. For example, the aboral cup of the pentacrinoid larva described herein is 1.3 mm high and just barely visible to the naked eye (the total preserved specimen height, including arms, aboral cup, and a partial column, is ~4.2 mm). The small piece of limestone with this juvenile crinoid was collected because it contains trilobites.

Taphonomy is also a critical factor. Based on actualistic studies, most echinoderms disarticulate rapidly after death (e.g., Meyer, Reference Meyer1971). The rate of disarticulation is area-dependent, so smaller articular surfaces with less connective tissue decay more rapidly than articulations with larger areas. Thus, preservation of complete or nearly complete fossil echinoderms is typically only possible when burial is rapid and permanent as a so-called ‘ecological snapshot’ (e.g., Taylor and Brett, Reference Taylor and Brett1996; Ausich, Reference Ausich2021). Examples of documented fossil cystidean larvae, pentacrinoid larvae, and early juvenile crinoids include Devonian specimens (Kammer et al., Reference Kammer, Bartels and Ausich2015; Ausich and Göncüoǧlu, Reference Ausich and Göncüoğlu2020; Bohatý and Ausich, Reference Bohatý and Ausich2025), a Mississippian crinoid (Ausich and Wood, Reference Ausich and Wood2012), and Pennsylvanian specimens (Pabian and Strimple, Reference Pabian and Strimple1985; Peters and Lane, Reference Peters and Lane1990). Later stage juveniles (crown height ~7.5 mm) are also known from the Brechin Lagerstätte in Protaxocrinus laevis (Billings, Reference Billings1857) (Wright et al, Reference Wright, Cole and Ausich2019).

Herein, we report a Late Ordovician early pentacrinoid larva (UMMP 84792) that is among the smallest Paleozoic pentacrinoid larvae known. This specimen is comprised of arms, aboral cup, and a partial column. The new larval specimen is a dendrocrinid eucladid crinoid from the Ordovician (Katian) of southern Ontario, Canada and is the oldest (geologically) known crinoid larva.

Location and stratigraphy

This new specimen is from the Lafarge Cannifton Agg Quarry in Cannifton, Ontario (44.206117, −77.370731). This region of southern Ontario is known for Ordovician strata with both rare trilobite species and rich echinoderm faunas (e.g., Billings, Reference Billings1859; Springer, Reference Springer1911; Brett and Taylor, Reference Brett, Taylor, Hess, Ausich, Brett and Simms1999; Sumrall and Gahn, Reference Sumrall and Gahn2006; Hessin, Reference Hessin2009; Ausich et al., Reference Ausich, Wright, Cole and Koniecki2018; Blake and Koniecki, Reference Blake and Koniecki2018; Cole et al., Reference Cole, Ausich, Wright and Koniecki2018, Reference Cole, Wright and Ausich2019, Reference Cole, Wright, Ausich and Koniecki2020; Wright et al., Reference Wright, Cole and Ausich2019). The juvenile crinoid specimen reported here is from the upper Verulam Formation.

Materials and methods

As noted, the juvenile specimen described is very small; it was discovered while preparing the slab with a light air abrasive to expose a specimen of the trilobite Ceraurus globulatus Bradley, Reference Bradley1930 that is close to the new crinoid specimen.

Classification and terminology

The superordinal and ordinal classifications follow Cole (Reference Cole2017, Reference Cole2018), Wright (Reference Wright2017a, Reference Wrightb), and Wright et al. (Reference Wright, Ausich, Cole, Rhenberg and Peter2017). Lacking a comprehensive, phylogeny-based classification for the Crinoidea below the ordinal level, family-level classification follows Moore and Teichert (Reference Moore and Teichert1978).

Morphologic terminology follows Ubaghs (Reference Ubaghs1978), Ausich et al. (Reference Ausich, Wright, Cole and Sevastopulo2020), and Ausich and Donovan (Reference Ausich and Donovan2023). All measurements are in mm.

Repository and institutional abbreviation

The specimen described herein is deposited in the collections of the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology (UMMP).

Systematic paleontology

Class Crinoidea Miller, Reference Miller1821

Subclass Pentacrinoidea Jaekel, Reference Jaekel1918

Infraclasss Inadunata Wachsmuth and Springer, Reference Wachsmuth and Springer1885

Parvclass Cladida Moore and Laudon, Reference Moore and Laudon1943

Magnorder Eucladida Wright, Reference Wright2017a

Superorder Cyathoformes Wright et al., Reference Wright, Ausich, Cole, Rhenberg and Peter2017

Cyathoformes incerta sedis: ‘Dendrocrinida’ Bather, Reference Bather1899

Dendrocrinida indet.

Figure 1, Table 1

Material

UMMP 84792.

Occurrence

Lafarge Cannifton Agg Quarry in Cannifton, Ontario, Canada; Ordovician (Katian).

Remarks

The Ordovician pentacrinoid larva of the crinoid reported herein consists of a slightly crushed aboral cup with attached arms and column. The slightly compacted aboral cup is ~1.3 mm high. It is comprised of infrabasal, basal, and radial plates (Fig. 1). The proportions of these cup plates are 22%, 50%, and 28%, respectively. Infrabasal plates are ~1.4 times higher than wide, and basal plates are ~1.4 times higher than wide. The radial plates are approximately as high as wide with peneplenary radial facets. Interestingly, the first primibrachial width is only ~50% of the width of the radial facet. Two arms are preserved with the one on the left having five short brachials with the terminal brachial rounded distally, which was judged to indicate that this arm is complete. Brachial plates are slightly wider than high. The incomplete column is heteromorphic and ~2.4 mm high.

Figure 1. Pentacrinoid larva from the Brechin Lagerstätte, Ordovician (Katian) of southern Ontario, Canada (UMMP 84792): (1) camera lucida drawing; black shading is for radial plates; (2) photograph of specimen. Scale bar for both images.

Very small crinoids are of two basic types, microcrinoids and larval crinoids. Microcrinoids have an aboral cup height ≤ 2 mm (Sevastopulo, Reference Sevastopulo, Ausich and Webster2008). Microcrinoids are not small forms in a growth series of otherwise larger crinoids because there are no larger counterparts of these small crinoids. Thus, they are considered adults. The two primary groups of microcrinoids are the Allagecrinidae (Disparida) and Codiacrinidae (Cyathoformes).

In contrast, larval crinoids, e.g., the specimen described herein, are early growth stages of typical-sized crinoids. Doliolaria larvae are released from crinoid ovaries into the water column and eventually settle to become very small larvae attached to the sea floor or another organism by a column and holdfast. The earliest benthic larva is the cystidean larva, which is comprised of only aboral cup plates, orals (now termed primary peristomial cover plates, see Sumrall and Waters, Reference Sumrall and Waters2012; Kammer et al., Reference Kammer, Sumrall, Zamora, Ausich and Deline2013), stalk, and holdfast (e.g., Mortenson, Reference Mortenson1920; Lahaye and Jangoux, Reference Lahaye and Jangoux1987; Holland, Reference Holland, Giese, Pearse and Pearse1991; Eleaume and Ameziane, Reference Eleaume, Ameziane, Ferel and David2003; Nakano et al., Reference Nakano, Hibino, Oji, Hara and Amemiya2003; Haig and Rouse, Reference Haig and Rouse2008; and Amemiya et al., Reference Amemiya, Omori, Tsurugaya, Hibino, Yamaguchi, Kuraishi, Kiyomoto and Minokawa2014). A benthic larva is termed a pentacrinoid larva after arms appear on the radial plates.

Fossil pentacrinoid larvae and perhaps cystidean larvae have been reported from the Hunsrück Slate of Germany (Kammer et al., Reference Kammer, Bartels and Ausich2015). The smallest of these specimens is ~1.0 mm in height. Preservation of this specimen is insufficient to determine whether the arms were present, but based on its size, it was interpreted to be an early pentacrinoid larva (Kammer et al., Reference Kammer, Bartels and Ausich2015, fig. 2). Slightly larger pentacrinoid larvae in the Hunsrück Slate have short arms that branch once (Kammer et al., Reference Kammer, Bartels and Ausich2015, fig. 2). Devonian cystidean and pentacrinoid larvae have also been reported recently from other regions of the Rhenish Massif in Germany (i.e., the Bergisches Land and the Eifel synclines) (Bohatý and Ausich, Reference Bohatý and Ausich2025). The smallest specimens lack arms and have aboral cups < 2 mm in height. The specimens reported by Bohatý and Ausich (Reference Bohatý and Ausich2025) were the first reported fossil cystidean larvae.

The pentacrinoid larva from Cannifton is slightly larger than those reported from the Hunsrück Slate, and the arms are well defined, although they are atomous rather than branched. Also note that the Cannifton pentacrinoid larva is approximately the same size as the very early living crinoid Metacrinus rotundatus Carpenter, Reference Carpenter1885 reported by Amemiya et al. (Reference Amemiya, Omori, Tsurugaya, Hibino, Yamaguchi, Kuraishi, Kiyomoto and Minokawa2014, fig. 7E). This M. rotundatus specimen is ~167 d past fertilization and has three primibrachials with a single pinnule plate articulated to the second primibrachial. Because three circlets of plates are present in the aboral cup and arms are free above the cup, the Cannifton larva is interpreted as an eucladid crinoid. Adult eucladid crinoids reported from the Brechin Lagerstätte include Cupulocrinus humilis (Billings, Reference Billings1857); Cupulocrinus jewetti (Billings, Reference Billings1859); Dendrocrinus simcoensis Wright, Cole, and Ausich, Reference Wright, Cole and Ausich2019; Grenprisia billingsi (Springer, Reference Springer1911); G. springeri (Moore, Reference Moore1962); Konieckicrinus brechinensis Wright, Cole, and Ausich, Reference Wright, Cole and Ausich2019; K. josephi Wright, Cole, and Ausich, Reference Wright, Cole and Ausich2019; Illemocrinus amphiatus Eckert, Reference Eckert1987; Plicodendrocrinus proboscidiatus (Billings, Reference Billings1857); Praecupulocrinus conjugans (Billings, Reference Billings1857); Protaxocrinus laevis; and Simcoecrinus mahalaki Wright, Cole, and Ausich, Reference Wright, Cole and Ausich2019. However, because morphology can change markedly through ontogeny, it is not possible to positively identify this pentacrinoid. Table 1 lists the adult character states of the Lafarge Quarry eucladid taxa compared to the Brechin pentacrinoid larva. None of the known adults correspond exactly with this postlarval juvenile, making even a tentative genus and species identification problematic. There are no unique characteristics in this Brechin pentacrinoid that would unequivocally allow a comparison to larger crinoids, e.g., the quadrilobate shape of the axial canal in the columns of cupressocrinids (Bohatý and Ausich, Reference Bohatý and Ausich2025). The circular column and the number of primibrachials in this new pentacrinoid larva presumably contrast with other Brechin eucladids (Table 1). Perhaps the two most similar taxa are K. josephi and P. conjugans although critical morphologic characters would have had to develop during growth if either of these species is the correct identification.

Table 1. Character states of the Katian pentacrinoid stage larva compared to sympatric adult crinoids

Based on the size and arm branching, the other quite small crinoids from the Brechin Lagerstätte (Wright et al., Reference Wright, Cole and Ausich2019, fig. 4.4) are much further developed than the pentacrinoid reported here. These other small crinoids should be considered juveniles rather than pentacrinoid larvae.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Leonard-Pingel, who helped with photography, and the editors and reviewers who improved this manuscript, including J. Bohatý, T.W. Kammer, and S. Zamora.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

Footnotes

Handling Editor: Przemyslaw Gorzelak

References

Amemiya, S., Omori, A., Tsurugaya, T., Hibino, T., Yamaguchi, M., Kuraishi, R., Kiyomoto, M., and Minokawa, T., 2014, Early stages in ontogeny of living isocrinid sea lily Metacrinus rotundus: Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), v. 97, p. 102116, https://doi.org/10.1111/azo.12109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., 2021, Disarticulation and Preservation of Fossil Echinoderms: Recognition of Ecological-Time Information in the Echinoderm Fossil Record: Elements of Paleontology, Cambridge, UK, Paleontological Society and Cambridge University Press, 56 p., https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108893374.Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Donovan, S.K., 2023, Glossary of crinoid morphological terms, in Ausich, W.I., ed., and Ausich, W.I., coordinating author, Treatise [on Invertebrate Paleontology] Online, Part T (Revised), Volume 1: Lawrence, Kansas, The Paleontological Institute, no. 167, 26 p. [see http://paleo.ku.edu/tronline/treatiseonline.html]Google Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Göncüoğlu, C.M., 2020, Juvenile eucladid crinoid from the Middle Devonian of Turkey: Geodiversitas, v. 42, no. 14, p. 215221, https://doi.org/10.5252/geodiversitas2020v42a14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., and Wood, T.E., 2012, Ontogeny in Hypselocrinus hoveyi, Mississippian cladid crinoid from Indiana: Journal of Paleontology, v. 86, p. 10171020, https://doi.org/10.1666/12-044R.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wright, D.F., Cole, S.R., and Koniecki, J.M., 2018, Disparid and hybocrinid crinoids (phylum Echinodermata) from the Late Ordovician (Katian) Brechin Lagerstätte of Ontario: Journal of Paleontology, v. 92, p. 850871, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2017.154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W.I., Wright, D.F., Cole, S.R., and Sevastopulo, G.D., 2020, Homology of posterior interray plates in crinoids: a review and new perspectives from phylogenetics, the fossil record, and development: Palaeontology, v. 63, p. 525545, https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bather, F.A., 1899, A phylogenetic classification of the Pelmatozoa: British Association for the Advancement of Science for 1898, p. 916923.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1857, New species of fossils from Silurian rocks of Canada: Canada Geological Survey, Report of Progress 1853–1856, Report for the year 1856, p. 247345.Google Scholar
Billings, E., 1859, On the Crinoidea of the lower Silurian rocks of Canada, Canadian Organic Remains, Decade 4: Canada Geological Survey, 72 p.10.4095/222585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D.B., and Koniecki, J., 2018 (issue dated 2019), Two new Paleozoic Asteroidea (Echinodermata) and their taxonomic and evolutionary significance: Journal of Paleontology, v. 93, p. 105114, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2018.70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohatý, J., and Ausich, W.I., 2025, First record of cystidean and determinable pentacrinoid stages in fossil Crinoidea—with new insights into the oral and anal endoskeletal anatomy of the Devonian subfamily Cupressocrininae (Eucladida): Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen, v. 325, no. 3, p. 231266, https://doi.org/10.1127/njgpa/1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J.H., 1930, The fauna of the Kimmswick Limestone of Missouri and Illinois: Contributions from the Walker Museum, University of Chicago, v. 2, p. 219290.Google Scholar
Brett, C.E., and Taylor, W.L., 1999, Middle Ordovician of the Lake Simcoe area of Ontario, Canada, in Hess, H., Ausich, W.I., Brett, C.E., and Simms, M.H., Fossil Crinoids: Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, p. 6374.10.1017/CBO9780511626159.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, P.H., 1885, On three new species of Metacrinus: Transactions of the Linnaean Society of London, v. 2, p. 435446.10.1111/j.1096-3642.1885.tb00296.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S.R., 2017, Phylogeny and morphologic evolution of the Ordovician Camerata (class Crinoidea, phylum Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 815828, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S.R., 2018, Phylogeny and evolutionary history of diplobathrid crinoids (Echinodermata): Palaeontology, v. 62, p. 357373, https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, L.R., Ausich, W.I., Wright, D.F., and Koniecki, J.M., 2018, An echinoderm Lagerstätte from the Upper Ordovician (Katian), Ontario: taxonomic re-evaluation and description of new dicyclic camerate crinoids: Journal of Paleontology, v. 92, p. 488505, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2017.151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S.R., Wright, D.F., and Ausich, W.I., 2019, Phylogenetic community paleoecology of one of the earliest complex crinoid faunas (Brechin Lagerstätte, Ordovician): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 521, p. 8298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.02.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S.R., Wright, D.F., Ausich, W.I., and Koniecki, J.M., 2020, Paleocommunity composition, relative abundance, and new camerate crinoids from the Brechin Lagerstätte (Upper Ordovician): Journal of Paleontology, v. 94, p. 11031123, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2020.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, J.D., 1987, Heterochrony (progenesis) in the Silurian crinoid Homocrinus Hall: Canadian Journal of Earth Science, v. 24, p. 25682571.10.1139/e87-239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleaume, M., and Ameziane, N., 2003, Developmental mode, egg size, larval size and some evolutionary considerations in comatulids (Crinoidea: Echinodermata), in Ferel, J.P., and David, B., eds., Echinoderm Research 2001, Proceedings, European Conference, 6th, Banyuls-sur-mer, 3–7 September 2001: Leiden, the Netherlands, Balkema Press, p. 307315.Google Scholar
Haig, J.A., and Rouse, G.W., 2008, Larval development of the featherstar Aporometra wilsoni (Echinodermata, Crinoidea): Invertebrate Biology, v. 127, p. 460469, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2008.00134.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessin, W.A., 2009, South-central Ontario Fossils: A Guide to the Ancient Marine Life of the Region: Cobourg, Ontario, privately published, 288 p.Google Scholar
Holland, N.D., 1991, Echinodermata: Crinoidea, in Giese, A.C., Pearse, J.S., and Pearse, V.B., eds., Reproduction of Marine Invertebrates, Volume 4, Echinoderms and Lophophorates: Pacific Grove, California, Boxwood Press, p. 247299.Google Scholar
Jaekel, O., 1918, Phylogenie und System der Pelmatozoen: Paläeontologische Zeitschrift, v. 3, no. 1, 128 p.Google Scholar
Kammer, T.W., Sumrall, C.D., Zamora, S., Ausich, W.I., and Deline, B., 2013, Oral region homologies in Paleozoic crinoids and other plesiomorphic pentaradiate echinoderms: PLoS ONE, v. 8, no. 11, n. e77989, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kammer, T.W., Bartels, C., and Ausich, W.I., 2015 (for year 2016), Postlarval pentacrinoids from the Lower Devonian Hunsrück Slate, Germany: Lethaia, v. 49, p. 307311, https://doi.org/10.1111/let.12147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahaye, M.-C., and Jangoux, M., 1987, The skeleton of the stalked stages of the comatulid crinoid Antedon bifida (Echinodermata): fine structures and changes during growth: Zoomorphology, v. 107, p. 5865.10.1007/BF00312130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D.L., 1971, Post-mortem disarticulation of Recent crinoids and ophiuroids under natural conditions: Abstracts with Programs, Geological Society of America, v. 3, p. 645.Google Scholar
Miller, J.S., 1821, A Natural History of the Crinoidea, or Lily-shaped Animals, with Observations on the Genera, Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites: Bristol, England, C. Frost, 150 p.10.5962/t.178175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R.C., 1962, Ray structures of some inadunate crinoids: University of Kansas, Paleontological Contributions, Echinodermata Article, no. 5, p. 147.Google Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Laudon, L.R., 1943, Evolution and classification of Paleozoic crinoids: Geological Society of America Special Paper, v. 46, p. 1154.10.1130/SPE46-p1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., 1978, Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2, Crinoidea, 3 Volumes: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America (and University of Kansas Press), 1027 p.Google Scholar
Mortenson, T., 1920, Studies in the development of crinoids: Papers of the Department of Marine Biology of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, v. 16, 94 p.Google Scholar
Nakano, H., Hibino, A., Oji, T., Hara, Y., and Amemiya, S., 2003, Larval stages of a living sea lily (stalked crinoid echinoderm): Nature, v. 421, p. 158160, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pabian, R.K., and Strimple, H.L., 1985, Classification, paleoecology and biostratigraphy of crinoids from the Stull Shale (Late Pennsylvanian) of Nebraska, Kansas, and Iowa: University of Nebraska State Museum Bulletin, v. 11, p. 181.Google Scholar
Peters, J., and Lane, N. G., 1990, Ontogenetic adaptations in some Pennsylvanian crinoids: Journal of Paleontology, v. 64, p. 427435.10.1017/S0022336000018655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevastopulo, G.D., 2008, Paleobiology of Carboniferous microcrinoids, in Ausich, W.I., and Webster, G.D., eds., Echinoderm Paleobiology: Bloomington, Indiana, Indiana University Press, p. 5569.Google Scholar
Springer, F., 1911, The crinoid fauna of the Knobstone Formation: Proceedings of the United States National Museum, v. 41, p. 175208.10.5479/si.00963801.1850.175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Gahn, F.J., 2006, Morphological and systematic reinterpretation of two enigmatic edrioasteroids (Echinodermata) from Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 43, p. 497507, https://doi.org/10.1139/e05-114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumrall, C.D., and Waters, J.A., 2012, Universal elemental homology in glyptocystitoids, hemicosmitoids, coronoids and blastoids: steps toward echinoderm phylogenetic reconstruction in derived blastozoans: Journal of Paleontology, v. 86, p. 956972, https://doi.org/10.1666/12-029R.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, W.L., and Brett, C.E., 1996, Taphonomy and paleoecology of echindoerm Lagerstätten from the Silurian (Wenlockian) Rochester Shale: PALAIOS, v. 11, p. 118140.10.2307/3515066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubaghs, G., 1978, General morphology, in Moore, R.C., and Teichert, C., eds., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America (and University of Kansas Press), p. T58T216.Google Scholar
Wachsmuth, C., and Springer, F., 1881–1885, Revision of the Palaeocrinoidea: Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia: Part 2, Family Sphaeroidocrinidae, with the sub-families Platycrinidae, Rhodocrinidae, and Actinocrinidae (1881), p. 177411 (separate repaged, p. 1–237); Part 3, Section 1, Discussion of the classification and relations of the brachiate crinoids, and conclusions of the generic descriptions (1885), p. 225–364 (separate repaged, p. 1–138).Google Scholar
Wright, D.F., 2017a, Bayesian estimation of fossil phylogenies and the evolution of early to middle Paleozoic crinoids (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 799814, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D.F., 2017b, Phenotypic innovation and adaptive constraints in the evolutionary radiation of Palaeozoic crinoids: Scientific Reports, v. 7, n. 13745, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13979-9.Google Scholar
Wright, D.F., Ausich, W.I., Cole, S.R., Rhenberg, E.C., and Peter, M.E., 2017, Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata): Journal of Paleontology, v. 91, p. 829846, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D.F., Cole, S.R., and Ausich, W.I., 2019 (in print volume dated 2020), Biodiversity, systematics, and new taxa of cladid crinoids from the Upper Ordovician (Katian) Brechin Lagerstätte: Journal of Paleontology, v. 94, p. 334357, https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Pentacrinoid larva from the Brechin Lagerstätte, Ordovician (Katian) of southern Ontario, Canada (UMMP 84792): (1) camera lucida drawing; black shading is for radial plates; (2) photograph of specimen. Scale bar for both images.

Figure 1

Table 1. Character states of the Katian pentacrinoid stage larva compared to sympatric adult crinoids