Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T15:15:56.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metabolic and molecular signatures of improved growth in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed surplus levels of methionine, folic acid, vitamin B6 and B12 throughout smoltification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2021

Anne-Catrin Adam*
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Research, 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway
Takaya Saito
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Research, 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway
Marit Espe
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Research, 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway
Paul Whatmore
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Research, 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway
Jorge Manuel De Oliveira Fernandes
Affiliation:
Nord University, Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, 1490, 8049 Bodø, Norway
Vibeke Vikeså
Affiliation:
Skretting ARC, Stavanger, 48, 4001 Stavanger, Norway
Kaja H. Skjærven
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine Research, 1870 Nordnes, 5817 Bergen, Norway
*
*Corresponding author: Anne-Catrin Adam, email Anne-Catrin.Adam@hi.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A moderate surplus of the one carbon (1C) nutrients methionine, folic acid, vitamin B6 and B12 above dietary recommendations for Atlantic salmon has shown to improve growth and reduce hepatosomatic index in the on-growing saltwater period when fed throughout smoltification. Metabolic properties and molecular mechanisms determining the improved growth are unexplored. Here, we investigate metabolic and transcriptional signatures in skeletal muscle taken before and after smoltification to acquire deeper insight into pathways and possible nutrient–gene interactions. A control feed (Ctrl) or 1C nutrient surplus feed (1C+) were fed to Atlantic salmon 6 weeks prior to smoltification until 3 months after saltwater transfer. Both metabolic and gene expression signatures revealed significant 1C nutrient-dependent changes already at pre-smolt, but differences intensified when analysing post-smolt muscle. Transcriptional differences revealed lower expression of genes related to translation, growth and amino acid metabolisation in post-smolt muscle when fed additional 1C nutrients. The 1C+ group showed less free amino acid and putrescine levels, and higher methionine and glutathione amounts in muscle. For Ctrl muscle, the overall metabolic profile suggests a lower amino acid utilisation for protein synthesis, and increased methionine metabolisation in polyamine and redox homoeostasis, whereas transcription changes are indicative of compensatory growth regulation at local tissue level. These findings point to fine-tuned nutrient–gene interactions fundamental for improved growth capacity through better amino acid utilisation for protein accretion when salmon was fed additional 1C nutrients throughout smoltification. It also highlights potential nutritional programming strategies on improved post-smolt growth through 1C+ supplementation before and throughout smoltification.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Analysed proximate composition and 1C nutrient levels in Ctrl and 1C+ feed. Re-used and modified table from Espe et al.(7). Feed composition is provided in online Supplementary Table S1

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Experimental design and sampling of muscle from Atlantic salmon fed a control feed (Ctrl) and a feed including surplus levels of one-carbon (1C) nutrients (1C+) through the smoltification period. The Ctrl feed contained 1C nutrients (folate, methionine, vitamin B6 and B12) as recommended and on the requirement levels to support maximal performance (ARRAINA(6) and NRC(9)). The 1C+ feed included even higher levels of the 1C nutrients, which improved growth when given through smoltification(7). Fish were fed in triplicate tanks for 6 weeks in the fresh water period, through saltwater transfer and 3 months in the on-growing saltwater period. Muscle tissue was sampled in the end of the fresh water and in the on-growing saltwater period for further analyses: global metabolic profiling, SAM/SAH by HPLC and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq). Figure is modified from Espe et al.(7).

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Feeding a 1C nutrient surplus to Atlantic salmon during the smoltification period changed metabolic and transcriptomic profiles in muscle from both pre- and post-smolts. (a) Volcano plots showing metabolomic data from pre-smolt and post-smolt muscle. Differences in metabolites (dots) between the 1C+ and Ctrl group were plotted as log2-transformed ratios of group means on the x-axis. Statistically different log2-ratios (FDR < 0·1, dashed line crossing the y-axis) were highlighted in shades of blue. In total, 13 and 37 out of 536 detected metabolites were different between 1C+ and Ctrl profiles at pre- and post-smolt, respectively. Metabolites with negative log2-ratios indicate lower levels (light blue) in the 1C+ compared with the Ctrl group, and vice versa for positive log2-ratios (dark blue). Metabolites with either high positive or negative log2-ratios display large magnitude differences between the groups. Metabolites-of-interest were labelled with their names (online Supplementary Table S4). (b) Metabolite class enrichment analysis shows that the largest differences between 1C+ and Ctrl muscle were in the amino acids and their conjugates, which were particularly pronounced in post-smolt muscle. Calculated enrichment scores (x-axis) underlie a ratio of significant altered metabolites (FDR < 0·1) among detected ones in a metabolite class in relation to all significant altered metabolites among all detected ones in the global metabolic profiling. Significance of enrichment was assessed using Fisher’s exact test with Benjamini and Hochberg correction(38) and adjusted P-values given for each bar. Bold compound classes designate significant enrichment (adjusted P-value < 0·05). (c) The total number of differentially expressed genes (DEG, RNA-seq) was higher in post-smolt (902) than in pre-smolt muscle (95) when using false-discovery adjusted P-value < 0·05 and |log2-fold change| 1 as significance cut-offs. Numbers within bars represent DEG with either higher (upregulated) or lower mRNA levels (down-regulated) in 1C+ muscle compared with Ctrl muscle. (a) , significantly higher metabolite level; , significantly lower metabolite level; , not significantly different; (c) , +log2FC; , –log2FC.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Relative amino acid levels in muscle from 1C+ and Ctrl fed salmon after smoltification (post-smolt). The heatmap illustrates individual sample levels of single amino acids and the N-metabolite taurine that were detected in the global metabolic profiling. Cysteine and asparagine were not detected. Each cell illustrates the level of a single amino acid (rows) in each sample (columns) from each dietary group expressed as pool-normalised ratios in a colour scale. Asterisks (*) show significantly different amino acid levels between 1C+ and Ctrl muscle (FDR < 0·1). Amino acids were sorted after the effect size (magnitude of log2ratio) between group means in the descending order. All metabolic data are provided in Supplementary Table S4.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) levels comparing 1C+ and Ctrl in pre- and post-smolt salmon muscle assessed by HPLC. The ratio of SAM to SAH is given as a measure to study methylation capacity in the muscle. Statistical significance was assessed using a two-tailed t test with P < 0·05. P-values of significant differences were indicated above dark grey coloured bars. Non-significant differences were kept light grey.

Figure 5

Table 2. Selected genes differentially expressed with diet in both pre-smolt and post-smolt muscle. List of all overlapping genes is provided in online Supplementary Table S7. Log2FC, log2-fold change. Adjusted P, adjusted P-value (output of DESeq2)

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Over-representation of differentially expressed genes (DEG) in KEGG pathways and cellular components (CC) between 1C+ and Ctrl muscle after smoltification. Over-representation analysis (ORA) was performed to show functional enrichment of DEG. Bars illustrate the DEG number in a category. Shades of blue highlight DEG either with positive (+log2FC) or negative log2-fold changes (-log2FC). DEG with -log2FC show lower mRNA levels in 1C+ than in Ctrl muscle. Adjusted P-values for each enrichment were associated with each category (bars). ORA is based on DEG with a |log2-fold change| > 1 and adjusted P-value < 0·05 when comparing gene expression of 1C+ and Ctrl muscle. , +log2FC; , –log2FC.

Figure 7

Table 3. Selected differentially expressed genes (DEG) between 1C+ and Ctrl post-smolt muscle categorised after their functional roles or pathway affiliation. Online supplementary Table S7 provides the full list of DEG between diet groups in post-smolts. Log2FC, log2-fold change. Adjusted P, adjusted P-value (output of DESeq2)

Figure 8

Fig. 6. mRNA expression of selected differentially expressed genes (DEG) that encode myofibrillar proteins and proteins regulating cytoskeletal organisation (a), and genes associated with growth and myogenesis regulating factors (b) between 1C+ and Ctrl muscle from post-smolts. Bar graphs show the group mean (n 9) of normalised mRNA read counts detected by RNA-seq. (a) tagln3-like: transgelin-3-like, myoz2: myozenin 2, mmp13: collagenase 3, cats: cathepsin S; (b) igfbp-1a1: insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 paralog A1, egr1: early growth response 1, mrf4: myogenic regulatory factor 4, mef2b-like: myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2B-like. Log2FC: log2-fold change; padj: adjusted P-value (DESeq2 output).

Supplementary material: PDF

Adam et al. supplementary material

Adam et al. supplementary material

Download Adam et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1.2 MB