Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-s74w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T21:01:42.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When a rise is not only a rise: An acoustic analysis of the impressionistic distinction between northern and central Taiwan Mandarin using Tone 1 as an example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2025

Janice Fon*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Yu-Ying Chuang
Affiliation:
Department of Taiwan Culture, Languages and Literature, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jfon@ntu.edu.tw
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study looked at the realization of the high-level Tone 1 in Taiwan Mandarin to examine a public impression of the central dialect, which is said to have a tendency to end with a rise. Fifty-three Mandarin native speakers (27 northern and 26 central) were recruited. Half performed a reading task and half a word-guessing task on 24 disyllabic words with Tone 1 embedded. Results showed rising realizations were the most prominent for the tone, regardless of dialect, gender, genre, and syllable position, but were more prevalent among females than males, and more common and enlarged in the final than the non-final position. Dialectal differences were twofold and mainly lay in the acoustic realization. Central speakers showed both a lower pitch register and a steeper declination than their northern counterparts, and central females also demonstrated an upstep in the final position of the word-guessing task, which completely annihilated the effect of the downtrend. This implies the impressionistic tendency to end high indeed exists in the Tone 1 of the central variety, but its percept is not based on rising realizations alone. Instead, it stands out as a dialectal feature via an enlargement of the rise in the foreground against a disruption of the downward trend in the background. The female lead in the realization suggests the rising Tone 1 does not come with a negative connotation. Perceptual tolerance for the variant likely stemmed from a long-standing free variation between high-level and high-rise for the tone.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Phonetic Association
Figure 0

Figure 1. Realization of the four tones in Taiwan Mandarin. Tone 3 has two tonal realizations, a low fall (solid line) and a low dipping (dotted line).

Figure 1

Figure 2. A google search on Taichung Qiang “Taichung accent” returned 20,100 results.

Figure 2

Table 1. Min usage calculated by the percentage of speakers using the language as the primary or the secondary means of daily communication in different regions of Taiwan adapted from the 2020 Population and Housing Census conducted by the Taiwan government (National Statistics R.O.C. 2021).

Figure 3

Table 2. Number of subjects in each group

Figure 4

Table 3. Perceived tonal contours of the target stimuli by at least two of the three judges. Numbers before the slashes are counts for the first syllable and those after are counts for the second. The “undecided” category refers to tonal contours that did not reach a majority vote.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Time-normalized mean pitch excursions of perceived level and rising contours in (a) male and (b) female speakers. Shaded areas represent standard error.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Mean duration of perceived level and rising contours in the two dialects. Error bars represent standard error. “North1” and “North2” refer to the first and second positions of the northern dialect, and “Central1” and “Central2” refer to the first and second positions of the central dialect.

Figure 7

Table 4. Fixed effects of the linear mixed model for duration using the first position of the level realization in the northern dialect as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 8

Table 5. Fixed effects of the mixed effects logistic regression on target CVN syllables using the first position in scripted speech in northern females as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 9

Figure 5. Rising percentages regarding POSITION and GENDER for the CVN stimuli in the two dialects.

Figure 10

Table 6. Perceived tonal contours of the non-CVN pairing syllables that are Tone 1 by at least two of the three judges. Numbers before the slashes are counts for the first syllable and those after are counts for the second. The “undecided” category refers to tonal contours that did not reach a majority vote.

Figure 11

Table 7. Fixed effects of the mixed effects logistic regression on the non-CVN pairing syllables of Tone 1 using the first position in scripted speech in northern females as the reference. ‘.’ p <.10, ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 12

Figure 6. Rising percentages regarding POSITION and GENDER for the non-CVN pairing syllables in the two dialects. “North1” and “North2” refer to the first and second positions of the northern dialect, and “Central1” and “Central2” refer to the first and second positions of the central dialect.

Figure 13

Table 8. Distribution of the two acoustic renditions of rising Tone 1s in the target stimuli.

Figure 14

Figure 7. Two renditions of time-normalized mean pitch excursions of Tone 1 tokens that were perceived as rising contours in (a) male and (b) female speakers. Shaded areas represent standard error.

Figure 15

Table 9. Fixed effects of the two linear mixed effects models on 10-point pitch extractions of rising Tone 1 tokens using the northern females as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 16

Figure 8. The distribution of mean pitch across DIALECT and GENDER. “N”: northern; “C”: central. The outlier was Speaker CGF.

Figure 17

Figure 9. Mean pitch of the beginning and end points of the rise across DIALECT for (a) scripted and (b) unscripted speech for males and (c) scripted and (d) unscripted speech for females. Error bars represent standard error.

Figure 18

Table 10. Fixed effects of the linear mixed model for males using the beginning point of the first position in northern scripted speech as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 19

Table 11. Fixed effects of the linear mixed models for (a) northern male speech using the beginning point of the first position in scripted speech as the reference, (b) central male scripted speech and (c) central male unscripted speech using the beginning point of the first position as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 20

Table 12. Fixed effects of the linear mixed model for females using the beginning point of the first position in northern scripted speech as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 21

Table 13. Fixed effects of the linear mixed model for (a) northern and (b) central females with regards to GENRE and POSITION using the first position in scripted speech as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 22

Figure 10. A demonstration of modeling the difference between two contours by using GAMM. The two tones in (a) are different in both f0 height and contour. Their point-wise raw contour differences are shown in (b), and their pure contour differences with the height differences extracted away are shown in (c).

Figure 23

Figure 11. Ten-point pitch extractions in northern and central dialects for male (a–d) and female speakers (e–h). The first and second columns respectively represent the first and second syllables of the scripted speech, while the third and fourth columns respectively represent the first and second syllables of the unscripted speech. Inverted triangles indicate the average divide between the falling and the rising arm. Shaded areas represent standard error.

Figure 24

Table 14. Summary of GAMM fitted to male f0 data using the first position in scripted speech from the northern dialect as the reference level. Boldface indicates dialectal differences for tonal height (parametric coefficients) and contour shape (smooth terms). ‘*’ p <.05, ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 25

Table 15. Summary of GAMM fitted to female f0 data using the first position in scripted speech from the northern dialect as the reference. Boldface indicates dialectal differences for tonal height (parametric coefficients) and contour shape (smooth terms). ‘**’ p <.01, ‘***’ p <.001.

Figure 26

Figure 12. Difference smooths predicted by GAMM for males (a–d) and females (e–h) in four GENRE/POSITION treatment conditions using the northern variety as the reference. The first and second columns respectively represent the first and second syllables of the scripted speech, while the third and fourth columns respectively represent the first and second syllables of the unscripted speech. Colored areas indicate confidence intervals bounded by two standard errors. Dialectal difference is not significant when the confidence intervals contain 0.

Figure 27

Table 16. Fixed effects of the linear mixed model for the falling proportion for males using the nonfinal position in northerner scripted speech as the reference. ‘*’ p <.05.

Figure 28

Table 17. A summary of the cues utilized by central speakers that potentially contribute to their dialectal signature. Both a full (✓) and a half check mark () indicate statistical significance between the two dialects. The former is used for effects that are independent of genre and syllable position, while the latter is for effects that are dependent on the two factors.